kaname-san
Member
Damn. So I won't have enough time to visit them all then.
Damn. So I won't have enough time to visit them all then.
Why don't we have like 20 Hubbles in space? Funding?
Our existence is behind astronomically bad odds. The odds probably aren't any better in any of the other galaxies.
Teleportation tech is the only thing that will allow us to expand, other than time and tenacity. Is teleportation even remotely possible? That is what these billionaires should be investing their money into, not the matrix theory.
Teleportation tech is the only thing that will allow us to expand, other than time and tenacity. Is teleportation even remotely possible? That is what these billionaires should be investing their money into, not the matrix theory.
Jesus can't be god's only son. He has to have other sons too... right?
Why is earth so special if that was the case?
Jesus can't be god's only son. He has to have other sons too... right?
Why is earth so special if that was the case?
'The universe is INFINITE! ... But yeah around 200billion galaxies'
The universe is big. And since the universe expanding constantly (faster than light to boot, space itself is stretching), we can never see the galaxies that are sufficiently far away. The further the galaxies are from us, the more redshifted they're, until they're effective invisible.
As a side note, there do seem to be dark matter galaxies as well, or more specifically, galaxies whose mass is mostly made from dark matter. Dark matter doesn't emit any radiation, nor doesn't interact with matter (except gravitation, apparently).
How does something more faster than light?
I used to think about this all the time but then I realized that I haven't even left my own continent so I should probably focus on my own planet firstThe scale of the universe is just so obscene, it's absurd to even think about. The scale was already at a value infinitely beyond human comprehension, and it's now thought to be even bigger. While I never like hearing people diminish human achievements or struggles based on scale alone, it's absolutely fascinating just how much is out there. Looking at it statistically, there's just so much possibility out there, and yet physical limitations of speed and the vast distances between even stars in our own galaxy seemingly provides an impenetrable barrier to us.
I used to think about this all the time but then I realized that I haven't even left my own continent so I should probably focus on my own planet first
I sometimes have nightmares imagining the rocket taking up the James Webb Telescope exploding. Or it malfunctioning. Id be dead before they did it again
Professor Conselice, in partnerships with researchers at the University of Edinburgh and Leiden University in the Netherlands, used Wilkinson's work and data from telescopes around the world, particularly Hubble, to create 3D maps of different parts of the universe. Mathematical analysis of the models using the calculated density of the galaxies and the volume for each mapped region of space allowed the researchers to deduce how many galaxies we are missing in our observations, and in turn, how many there are in total spread across the universe.
This doesnt meant the Universe is ten times bigger than we thought, or there are ten times as many stars. Ill explain I mean, duh, its what I do but to cut to the chase, what they found is that there are lots of teeny, faint galaxies very far away that have gone undetected. So instead of being in a smaller number of big galaxies, stars are divvied up into a bigger number of smaller ones.
Mind you, just because we dont see 90 percent of the galaxies in the Universe doesnt mean this explains dark matter or anything like that. We know thats not made of any kind of normal matter like the stuff that makes up stars, planets, you, and me. These unseen galaxies are extremely far away, and made of stars and gas and dust just like galaxies here are. Its just that theyre faint.
And it doesnt mean the Universe has 10 times more mass than we thought. The mass is the same, its just distributed differently than we thought. Its like knowing there are a million people in a city, and finding out they live in 100,000 buildings when you thought they were only in 10,000. There are more buildings, but not more people.
There is a quantum result commonly called "no quantum cloning" that states that when you want to make a copy of something, you change the original state the first thing was in. When the state of something gets changed in physics, it's not like you go from being hit to being cold or something, you end up with something completely different.There is a theory I heard of that if it is possible, the original person would die and just leave behind a copy. That is scary stuff.
The best theory I've heard for "teleportation" would be to capture two ends of a micro-wormhole (which are constantly popping in and out of existence all around us), expand them, then move them into play. That still requires conventional travel to set the origin and destination, of course. Other than that, we'd just have to get lucky finding an existing stable, traversable wormhole, which probably isn't a thing.Having a telepod on the other side? Probably. massive energy expenditure for it, mo liek, and they you got a perfect clone walking around in the other side of the universe.
Without a telepod? Eeeeeh...
The distances are so vast and the time frames so small that they basically appear stationary. Plus most movement is in the expansion of the universe, so everything beyond our local cluster is essentially moving away from us in each direction.If galaxies are moving, wouldn't we see the same ones more than once?
Teleportation tech is the only thing that will allow us to expand, other than time and tenacity. Is teleportation even remotely possible? That is what these billionaires should be investing their money into, not the matrix theory.
All these claims and i'm still waiting on real proof for the Big Bang.
Most still call it a widely accepted theory thats why i'm waiting.
They're talking about the observable universe. Basically, the amount of universe whose light/signals/whatever has reached us over the years.'The universe is INFINITE! ... But yeah around 200billion galaxies'
Phil Plait had a good explanation of this discovery in his latest column:
http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astr...re_two_trillion_galaxies_in_the_universe.html
Just as we thought we knew it all, webam, there's more.