New Superman Returns Trailer

Status
Not open for further replies.
True that. Brains, braun, money and looks. What does the AGD have? Matching outfits and a shared bed? :D
 
I'm sorry, but I thought the trailer looked excellent. I'm not a huge fan of superhero films and this one never really seemed interesting before, but after that trailer, it certainly looks like a great popcorn flick with some nice doses of humor.

Of course I won't pay to see it. ;\

But then again, the last film I chose to pay to see in theaters was Coffee and Cigarettes two years ago.
 
Solo said:
Well, I said Id hold off until this trailer to pass more judgment. And here it is. And it doesnt have my outlook improving. Everything just seems *off* to me. Anyways, opinions and assholes and all that.
Pretty much my view. I actually love Spacey's Luthor, but that's about it; everything else just rubs me the wrong way.

I'll still see it, but my expectations are at an all-time low.
 
Just watched the trailer. Made for tv movie, anyone?? Spacey will be good, but everything else looks like shit. Ugh.

I will still see it opening night though...
 
Looks absolutely great, everything I was expecting it to be ...



Oh and you'd have to be seriously blind to not see the
Superboy
thing coming, I've been calling that ever since I saw Superman 2 and then the plot for this movie. Wouldnt you agree Willco?
 
I will never understand Willco's obsession with the Spiderman movies.

This trailer looks okay, but they should have just not associated this with donner's films!!!
 
Dr. Jade said:
Oh and you'd have to be seriously blind to not see the
Superboy
thing coming, I've been calling that ever since I saw Superman 2 and then the plot for this movie. Wouldnt you agree Willco?

Blind? Why? They never hinted in Superman II that they wear going down that road, and pardon me for putting my faith into an Oscar nominated director not to go down that road as well. It doesn't seem that blind to me, especially when the opposite direction is much more fresh and allows for real human drama in Superman's God-like existence, whereas now we've devolved into some hokey, cheesy writing. I mean
Superboy beating up Lex's henchmen with a piano?

Why don't we bring out Krypto while we're at it. Gag me.

Sonki said:
I will never understand Willco's obsession with the Spiderman movies.

That, is why you fail.
 
purnoman3000 said:
That has got to be the ugliest kid i've seen in.... ever.

Who cares if hes fugly,hes a little boy Pedoman3000 O_o
 
Willco said:
Blind? Why? They never hinted in Superman II that they wear going down that road, and pardon me for putting my faith into an Oscar nominated director not to go down that road as well. It doesn't seem that blind to me, especially when the opposite direction is much more fresh and allows for real human drama in Superman's God-like existence, whereas now we've devolved into some hokey, cheesy writing. I mean
Superboy beating up Lex's henchmen with a piano?
uumm.. they had sex in the fortress of solitude.. not like there's a qwikie mart right down the street to pick up some condoms.. maybe lois brought some with her in hopes that supes would become normal so she could get it on with him...

Why don't we bring out Krypto while we're at it. Gag me.
The golden age says fuck you. leave krypto out of this :lol
 
Matrix said:
Who cares if hes fugly,hes a little boy Pedoman3000 O_o

:lol

ooze49rd.gif
 
borghe said:
uumm.. they had sex in the fortress of solitude.. not like there's a qwikie mart right down the street to pick up some condoms.. maybe lois brought some with her in hopes that supes would become normal so she could get it on with him...

Several things. Superman was human when they had sex, and when did they ever even HINT at Lois
carrying Supes' child
? Really. Oh wait, the answer is never.

The golden age says fuck you. leave krypto out of this :lol

Having a
Superboy beating up henchmen with a piano in a big unveil is worse or better
than Krypto? Me? I'll take Krypto at this point.
 
I have to say, DC superhero trailers kick so much ass. I was wavering about Brandon Routh but excited about Kevin Spacey then the first trailer hit and I saw it in the theaters and with Superman godlike hovering over the Earth and I totally geeked out. I was wavering with what Moriarty said because my opinions on movies are usually right in line with his but I have to say I got more faith then him on this one. I hate to see them reuse a plot device but i'm not as jaded on them going with that other major spoiler thing that people already know about.

Trailer is Fuckton awesome. I give it a A+
 
Blind? Why? They never hinted in Superman II that they wear going down that road, and pardon me for putting my faith into an Oscar nominated director not to go down that road as well. It doesn't seem that blind to me, especially when the opposite direction is much more fresh and allows for real human drama in Superman's God-like existence, whereas now we've devolved into some hokey, cheesy writing.


I definitly agree that its insanely cheesy, but hopefully they'll find a way to make it ... well ... interesting i suppose. I mean I first drew the connection when in Superman II
once Lois discovered that Clark was Superman they had Super sex. Singer and the rest of the crew have always said that Superman Returns follows S1 completely and only parts of S2, and none of S3 OR S4. Ever since I saw that kid and read those interviews its been pretty obvious... least to me it was. And since it seems the story is on the cliche bandwagon it seemed way too obvious to me that the writers would never go as far as letting Lois Lane have a kid with another guy, the comic book guys would start a riot. Thats like Mary Jane having a kid with another guy, same thing.
 
Oh and fuck yea Kevin Spacey. I've been waiting to see him in action and that was so spot on. I love his Luthor.
 
The scene where Superman lands really quickly with bent knees looked weird to me. That and the badly done gatling gun sequence looks totally odd.

Other than that, the human interest stuff (Lois with a kid, etc..etc) doesn't seem all that interesting. The plane sequence looks pretty cool though.
 
I think you're going to alienate far more comic book purists by letting
Lois and Superman have a kid than it just being her and Perry's
. It's fresh and it doesn't suck.
 
Willco said:
Several things. Superman was human when they had sex, and when did they ever even HINT at Lois
carrying Supes' child
? Really. Oh wait, the answer is never.
maybe he wasn't really human, and he just had his powers removed, like flipping a switch where the yellow sun would affect him now the same way the red sun would normally affect him. I don't know.. but as long as the story is decent I'm certainly not going to sweat the details because it doesn't exist in any continuities.. again I haven't read the script, so I'll have to wait til 6/30 to know for sure.

Having a
Superboy beating up henchmen with a piano in a big unveil is worse or better
than Krypto? Me? I'll take Krypto at this point.
eh.. really I just don't have a big problem with it. to me movies have never been canon anyway.. more or less just elseworlds.. some are rather faithful elseworlds, some are insanely deviating elseworlds.. much like Batman in victorian england..

Willco said:
I think you're going to alienate far more comic book purists by letting
Lois and Superman have a kid than it just being her and Perry's
. It's fresh and it doesn't suck.
sometimes the comics' purists deserve to be alienated.. besides.. you need to get the mainstream into the movie.. superman sells like 40-50K per month.. who do you care about more, the 40-50K who will CONTINUE to buy superman comics or the millions and millions who DON'T by superman comics.
 
I have no problems with the film deviating from the source material, I have a problem the following:

a) BAD WRITING
b) DESTROYING THE CHARACTER

Also, if this is all true, how many sequels are we removed from getting
Superman and Superboy team up as dynamic father and son duo to tackle Lobo and other generic supervillains!

Seriously, Singer... WHY?
 
Willco said:
I have no problems with the film deviating from the source material, I have a problem the following:

a) BAD WRITING
b) DESTROYING THE CHARACTER

Also, if this is all true, how many sequels are we removed from getting
Superman and Superboy team up as dynamic father and son duo to tackle Lobo and other generic supervillains!

Seriously, Singer... WHY?
oh, bad writing definitely sucks.. that remains to be seen. maybe it will be, maybe it won't, but I'm not going to worry about what moriarty says. I'll make up my own mind.

as for destroying the character, I don't see it that way at all.. the spoiler happens in various continuities in one form or another, why not this one? as long as the story is solid I don't see how it could "destroy the character"

and if we get what you hypothesize, then yes we got fucked.. but I just don't see it.. at least not with singer aboard..
 
Willco said:
I think you're going to alienate far more comic book purists by letting
Lois and Superman have a kid than it just being her and Perry's
. It's fresh and it doesn't suck.

meh, I think you're a little to worked up about it. My friends can't stand me when a comic book movie comes out and I start nitpicking but this isn't really a big deal. Now if the
super kid starts flying around and beating up the bad guys and saves the day that will be incredibly stupid and just cheesy. It's not like Superman hasn't had a kid before in other elseworlds tales like DKR2 and got Wonder Woman knocked up in Kingdom Come. And I don't consider the movies comic book canon, just nice if they stick to the more basic and true mythos of Supermans abilities, origins and loose on the villains but as close as possible.
 
Well, at this point, Moriarty says in a big unveil that we learn
it's Supes' kid because he saves the day by lifting a grand piano and beating up one of Lex's henchmen with it.

... Really. There better have been some on set re-writes. This movie went immediately from MUST SEE to GAME TIME DECISION in a matter of hours.
 
Actually, one of the #1 story suggestions for the One Year Later Superman storyline in the comic was to
give him a kid
.

Also, Mcweeeeeeeny's "review" is crap because he bashes the Donner movies in it. If he hates the Donner movies so much, it's no wonder he doesn't like Returns.
 
ManaByte said:
Actually, one of the #1 story suggestions for the One Year Later Superman storyline in the comic was to
give him a kid
.

I haven't read Supes in a long, long time, but I'm assuming this is some kind of future or Elsewords story? Which would be a lot different than Superman right now in celluoid form. Also, there's a huge difference from
Superman having a baby and Superman dealing with a 6-year-old super powered brat
. Singer hates me.
 
no.. one year later is the fall out from Infinite Crisis. After Inifinite Crisis (was supposed to) wrapped up all the DCU titles the next month started things a year after the end of IC. It is considered mainstream continuity.
 
For some reason, the trailer makes me yearn for a DBZ movie. The campiness, the scope of the battle scenes, the talk of uber-powerful
children
, I'd definitely put this aside for a decent DBZ adaptation.
 
Willco said:
Well, at this point, Moriarty says in a big unveil that we learn
it's Supes' kid because he saves the day by lifting a grand piano and beating up one of Lex's henchmen with it.

... Really. There better have been some on set re-writes. This movie went immediately from MUST SEE to GAME TIME DECISION in a matter of hours.

There was and I'm wondering how old the script is that Moriarty has because he mentions only
2 action sequences
in the whole movie but even from the trailer it's clear there are more including
the mini-gun/bank robbery along with those reported from the ShoWest trailer and promotional stills including Luthor's assault on Metropolis, Missile Attack, The Daily Planet rescue, 777 Rescue, Whatever goes down on New Krypton and the finale.
 
G-Fex said:
Anyways it looks absolutely awesome.
Agreed.

I have no issues with the lack of action in the trailer, since Superman isn't all about action. Color me VERY interested, and Routh is perfect for the role, judging from the trailer. Spacey looks like he nailed it as well. Whole cast, actually.
 
I love quicktime alternative and apple offering hd versions that go perfectly well with my 1920 x 1200 resolution. Using directshow filters that make it smoother is also awesome.

As for the trailer, I don't know how it's going to be, but I'm going to go watch it.
 
Don't like Lois. Spacey's good. Routh works it seems, though I gotta see how well he carries the entire film before the nod. One thing I fear though is too much a familiarity to Spider-man - the old lady with the moral message and the heavy newspaper and photography business seem like elements needlessly put in to make it closer to Spider-man. I realize it fits in Superman's world as well, but I'd prefer they used that time for something more original and unique to the Superman universe.
 
J2 Cool said:
Don't like Lois. Spacey's good. Routh works it seems, though I gotta see how well he carries the entire film before the nod. One thing I fear though is too much a familiarity to Spider-man - the old lady with the moral message and the heavy newspaper and photography business seem like elements needlessly put in to make it closer to Spider-man. I realize it fits in Superman's world as well, but I'd prefer they used that time for something more original and unique to the Superman universe.


Spiderman was damn near a remake of Superman 78.
 
yeah. spacey = dr. evil. not lex.

I dunno. I've never been that impressed with Singer's work so it's not like I'm very crestfallen with the idea that this could suck. I'll still see it, naturally, but I'm not expecting it to be as good as Spiderman 2 or Batmang Begins.
 
Spiderman was damn near a remake of Superman 78.



FINALLY. someone else agrees with me. Uncle Ben: "With great power comes great responsibility" ... well i wonder where they took that line from!?
 
Dr. Jade said:
FINALLY. someone else agrees with me. Uncle Ben: "With great power comes great responsibility" ... well i wonder where they took that line from!?
umm.. paraphrased from the spider-man comics from the 60's. :P
 
Dr. Jade said:
FINALLY. someone else agrees with me. Uncle Ben: "With great power comes great responsibility" ... well i wonder where they took that line from!?

You obviously have never read a spidey comic.......
 
Willco said:
I think you're going to alienate far more comic book purists by letting
Lois and Superman have a kid than it just being her and Perry's
. It's fresh and it doesn't suck.

Gee, I wasn't aware Lois had
boned Perry, I always thought she was with Richard White. Guess she has the same geriatric lusts Catherine Zeta-Jones does.
This is why you fail.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom