DF were already looking suspect when thy were riding tht 8tf wavewe know some of them are fanboys.
Are you suggesting that developers can't code specifically to the XSX and use XSX features? That they code for it as if it's a PC that is completely encapsulated to them? That's not true. It wasn't true to any Xbox ever and MS already confirmed low-level access to some parts of the XSX APU which means that once again, that's not true:
controller ? if yes possibly also without any problems could be great.
ond elite one (i have one) has the grip fiasco ...
I never found the guy interesting from the start. I didn't know his affiliations yet. I just never liked him and still don't. Whenever I play a DF video and it's him, I close the video. I also find it very weird how he's so giddy in the videos yet so aggressive on the net. Maybe I don't like his hair? Lol duno. Something feels fake about him.
Only time i use share button on my DS4 is by reflex coming from another controller so I'm probably not the man to see how important it is.
That they've made (logical) customizations means they've made enough customizations to efficiently harness the power of their beast? I can assure you that I have not seen money from anyone for making my statements. But I am sure that large companies do collect sales with theirs. Another thing is what you find at home after buying your products. That's then where you will really see what the FUD is (you know that I have not bothered to look for what FUD means but because of the tone it should not be a good thing, if I am wrong receive my cordial apologies).Hold on a sec, now you're spreading FUD dude. MS have explicitly mentioned they've made customizations to DX12U that are specific to the XSX. There are customizations to BCPack and mesh shading support only present on XSX.
Now I honestly have to question your other statements because that info I just referred to is public knowledge. Kind of surprised you did not hear of it whatsoever, maybe you just forgot
I hate to put it that way, but you went kind of out-of-pocket with that take.
They..just literally had the guy from the Xcloud division move to the VR/AR department. So again, more FUD on your part. This is why I took insider claims during speculation with a grain of salt. It's too easy to spot these kind of inconsistencies now.
Easy... Easy...And unfortunatelyBGs contributed directly to it with FUD. Would not say it's been across the whole thread though, that's unfair IMHO. Maybe select posts here or there.
Honestly surprised me; I didn't take their speculation earlier as seriously as some other speculation, but at least gave benefit of the doubt to consider it. Now I wonder if it that was worth doing.
Dunno, maybe they just didn't come across that information. It isn't necessarily super-easy to find, I had to come across it from people quoting it on other forums. But still, being a developer I'd assume that's the type of info you would make sure to know before putting any public comments out with your name attached to 'em :/
Thank you sharing this with us. I really apreaciate it.
If
So it had to be you, a PS5 FUD machine who pretend to be neutral, who accuse (2 times in 20min) a vetted developer of creating FUD for stating the obvious
Stop baiting the thread, you are so obvious
Fake
, you're right that no one has to believe them...so why are you bringing that up? Are you implying anyone who doesn't believe someone should just..... not say anything? Just stay silent? Sorry but free speech doesn't work that way.
Rusco Da Vino
Look I know it's hard for someone such as yourself to have your own independent thought on these matters, but that doesn't mean the rest of us have that same issue. See how well the whole aspect of being vetted or not did for several insiders during the earlier parts of speculation here.
BGs
that his statements might negatively contribute to more FUD going forward. Just wanted to explicitly mention that.thicc_girls_are_teh_best Just let me give you some little advice. Unless you want people searching inside your post history, stop accusing every 'insider' here of spreading FUD. Was fun, but lets move on and forget all those hype generated.
The memory is shared, every piece of data needed by both GPU and CPU - if it needs high reading speeds it will be in the 10GB partition, if it doesn't it will be on the 3.5GB partition. If both CPU and GPU need access to a piece of data and that data will need to be accessed at 560GB/s, why put it on the 3.5GB partition in the first place? I'm gladly willing to disagree, wait a few weeks, and see DF videos analyzing third party games running on both machines.
www.extremetech.com
www.eurogamer.net
Welp, GPU achieves latency hiding with fine grained multithreading (and memory access coalescing?) But within each thread (wrap/wavefront) a load/store instruction will block (not stall), I think we can agree on that?
Kingthrash
Has been saying this for so long, He continuously insists it started with MS choosing them over everyone else to showcase the premier of the Xbox One X on their Youtube channel.
But the deep dive on the PS5 architecture was with Rich. He is from the old "UK Resistance" guard of Sega, but he is first and foremost a professional and the in depth feature was not biased. I criticised DF when taking subjective points of view but most of the time are a top notch channel.
www.eurogamer.net
Who is Dealer? Is a YouTuber? I'm not so into the game press as I used to be.
I don't think DF is biass the thing is we know one of its member looks like it is, Alex was/is part of some famous discord channel full the ''la crème de la crème ",
He is not
It has been hard to read your post until the end; too much nonsense, silly BS and embarrassing double standards per m²Ah, almost missed these.
No, BGs contributed to FUD with that statement. It's clear as day.
If someone, regardless of their stature, has the freedom to post wrong information or speculation that doesn't have much room to exist since actual info that contradicts it is out there, I have the freedom to speak up on it. It's that simple.
And I was one of the people who said, even then, that if they turned out to be wrong on some things, people shouldn't go out blaming them, attacking them, "shooting the messenger" more or less. But it's also been established early on I don't take someone's word as gospel just because they're a "vetted dev".
Oh and please tell me what PS5 FUD I've created? Go ahead, pull up my quotes. You won't find any. Anything I speculated about PS5 early on was framed as just that: speculation. And I almost always gave caveats with that, too. I didn't jump on the "PS5 has no hardware RT" train when that tried picking up steam. I never fully committed to the "PS5 is 9 TF" train, either. In fact I gave room for a 48 CU PS5 chip in my speculations, and that was weighed against the Github info AND the insider speculation, AND other things like the IT Media report and Bloomberg article (btw Jason Schreir is working there now so if someone wants to say the Bloomberg stuff isn't worth considering I hope they'll hold that consistent standard when Schreir starts his write-ups, or will Bloomberg mysteriously be credible when that happens?).
BTW you're one of the posters I was referring to earlier when I mentioned to
This is a ridiculous statement, and maybe I was wrong in saying the thread wasn't full of FUD from some other posters after all. Go ahead, search my post history. Show me exactly where I accused EVERY insider of spreading FUD!
Good luck, because I never said that. I said BGs made a statement today that, whether it was their intention or not, might contribute to future FUD in regards next-gen discussions. Apparently now that involves posters like you creating FUD against me as well.
So I think this'll be my final post in this thread. It's pretty obvious some of you guys have some twisted logic in trying to call me out on stuff I haven't even said, simply because I had the gall to disagree with BGs. And I still stand by that disagreement with them. They responded back, and I responded to their response. They clearly don't need you guys to white knight for them.
I agree, with moving on. I'm out of this thread. Knock yourselves out.
Games locked at 30fps probably run between 40-50fps 99% of the time on current consoles.
Yes and another member of DF says the last time we were in a similar situation was in Nintendo 64 era where was possible to run code from ROM .
This old thread is brutal.
Digital Foundry :- Does resolution really matter?
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-does-resolution-really-matter Guess the author... It all makes for fascinating reading. In an era where the relevancy of the specialist press is under scrutiny, we find that coverage of the resolution issue not just made it into the...www.neogaf.com
WHERE ARE THE MODS NOW!!!!!????
I am afraid to read that thread.This old thread is brutal.
Digital Foundry :- Does resolution really matter?
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-does-resolution-really-matter Guess the author... It all makes for fascinating reading. In an era where the relevancy of the specialist press is under scrutiny, we find that coverage of the resolution issue not just made it into the...
Nah it started long before that. I remember them making a big deal out of 20p differences between Xbox 360 and ps3 versions of games.
