• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Next-Gen PS5 & XSX |OT| Console tEch threaD

Status
Not open for further replies.

McHuj

Member
If Sparkman is not the supposed Lockhart (that BW is too high for a weaker console) then why such a weird codename compared to Arden? Sparkman has nothing to do with Shakespeare.

That Sparkman BW leak is confusing me.

Unless Sparkmas is not Lockhart, but the final revision of XsX. I think there were some leaps to fit Sparkman to Lockhart. Arden/Sparkman could simply be just like Ariel/Oberon (same chip/newer revision/final production?).
 

xPikYx

Member
This comparison makes no sense. Also, using video of a game trailer or a game to determine TF power, even vaguely? No. Just.. no.
Vague like Oberon, Arden, Gonzalo, RDNA1, RDNA2, RT yes, RT no etc.?

I did a very basic assumption : the former is much better than the latter, ergo XSX is more powerful than PS5
 
Last edited:

HeisenbergFX4

Gold Member
I just wish we would get the final reveals and most importantly pricing.

What if PS5 is in fact 9.2 TFs @ $399 and Nextbox is a 12TF monster @ $599?
 

Arlgrim

Banned
If you compare hellblade2 with godfall by the way it looks that way (XSX 12tf PS5 9tf)

Compare it with god of war or uncharted 4 , and you have a ps4 of 12Tf.

giphy.gif
 

HeisenbergFX4

Gold Member
So devs will be liers for saying both machines have two digit TFs.

I wasnt implying how strong either machine would be as I have a pretty good suspicion both machines will be very close in power/price.

Just saying none of the power speculations matter until we know what we are paying for them.
 

nowhat

Member
If you compare hellblade2 with godfall by the way it looks that way (XSX 12tf PS5 9tf)
Hellblade 2, "in-engine" (which doesn't mean it's real time nor running on target hardware) - yeah, there are not many assumptions to be made based on that footage.
 

Bryank75

Banned
That’s right bro. Digital Foundry had it all wrong. If the PS5 is weak, Xbox has to be weaker. A world where the opposite happens is impossible. How dare they?
Well if you read what I am saying, the CPU in the Xbox would be faster which is a bigger deal I would say!
 

Mass Shift

Member
Unless Sparkmas is not Lockhart, but the final revision of XsX. I think there were some leaps to fit Sparkman to Lockhart. Arden/Sparkman could simply be just like Ariel/Oberon (same chip/newer revision/final production?).

You never know what they did with Lockhart in the interim. Could be the reason why they brought it back.
 

Fake

Gold Member
And hints from Devs and so called "insiders" do not mean anything until we get something official imo.
Devs are not 'insiders' mind you. And as far I know, if the dev is really using a devkit, maybe he words counts more than insiders.

But I agree, official > any other shit.
 

Nickolaidas

Member
Evidence that you know better?
Hell, no. It's that it seems sound to me to see some people claiming that TFs don't really matter - when TFs in next gen may end up disappointing many of us. You know like someone saying 'sex isn't everything' when he has little to no sex, know what I mean?
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
Yes it is.

It is an industry wide measurement unit used across brands and architectures for measuring floating point calculations. The atoms of the construction that are games.

You are confusing it with the layout of those atoms, which depends on what you are trying to build. There is no single measurement unit for all builds (other than TFlops). Good luck doing the math on that.

We aren't using the TFs number in the most literal way possible. That's what you want to do and that's fine. We gamers are more focused on a console or GPU's ability to performance tasks. So if the PS5 is a 10 TF RDNA2 console, it makes sense to let people know that it will be similar to a 13 TF GCN GPU (Nvidia 2080Ti).
 

ManaByte

Gold Member
Hell, no. It's that it seems sound to me to see some people claiming that TFs don't really matter - when TFs in next gen may end up disappointing many of us. You know like someone saying 'sex isn't everything' when he has little to no sex, know what I mean?

It's the opposite of websites back in 2013 claiming the human eye can't see 1080p.
 

Nickolaidas

Member
I wanna ask you techies something: if the PS5 ends up being a 9.2 TF console in late 2020, does this make it a mid-range PC in the second of its inception like the PS4 was (which failed to impress people with its specs)? Or are we talking about an improvement?
 

bitbydeath

Member
Oh, WOW, just fuc**** WOW :







source.gif


Xboners dream about weaker PS5 deadier than dead

So those codenames have nothing to do with next-gen at all.

Finally we can bury it.
 

DForce

NaughtyDog Defense Force
If I didn't know better, I'd swear they're trying to soften the blow … :D


It goes in line what we have been discussing already.


The Low-End console from MS rumored to be 4TF, but it performs better than the Xbox One X, which is a 6TF console.

Maybe MS and Sony won't focus on TF numbers because it would be a bit harder to market. For example: If they say it's TWICE the GPU power of the XB1X, but the TF count is only 9.2, then it's going to leave some people confused. Same can be said about the Lockheart, which is 4TF, but better than the 6TF console.
 

bitbydeath

Member
It goes in line what we have been discussing already.


The Low-End console from MS rumored to be 4TF, but it performs better than the Xbox One X, which is a 6TF console.

Maybe MS and Sony won't focus on TF numbers because it would be a bit harder to market. For example: If they say it's TWICE the GPU power of the XB1X, but the TF count is only 9.2, then it's going to leave some people confused. Same can be said about the Lockheart, which is 4TF, but better than the 6TF console.

It doesn’t matter now.
Oberon, Ariel, Arden have nothing to do with next-gen. They were AMD internal testing only.
 

Nickolaidas

Member
It goes in line what we have been discussing already.


The Low-End console from MS rumored to be 4TF, but it performs better than the Xbox One X, which is a 6TF console.

Maybe MS and Sony won't focus on TF numbers because it would be a bit harder to market. For example: If they say it's TWICE the GPU power of the XB1X, but the TF count is only 9.2, then it's going to leave some people confused. Same can be said about the Lockheart, which is 4TF, but better than the 6TF console.

So maybe … maybe it really *does* not matter.

Maybe what we're about to live next year is the 386/486 era all over again. Remember back in the early 90s, when you only had a VGA graphics card and the only thing that mattered on your PC was the number of MHz in order to have good performance and speed in games? And when the first good 3D graphics cards appeared, suddenly MHz weren't as much important as the graphics cards were (in terms of how many MB/GB of RAM those cards had and whatnot)?

Maybe it's this again.
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
Yeah, it's kinda like saying "As Moore's law slows and our perf ambitions increase it leads to design innovation. Software innovations like VRS will also be critical"

Now you’re just being silly.

Or when asked if it’s 12TF, the answer given was, “we did the math, it’s twice the power of the X1X GPU”.

Well, simple math would be 6+6 = 12. That doesn’t need to be done for us.

It’s the RDNA effect.
 
Last edited:

DForce

NaughtyDog Defense Force
It doesn’t matter now.
Oberon, Ariel, Arden have nothing to do with next-gen. They were AMD internal testing only.

I believe it has some relevance. If this turns out to be true, then the new Xbox is not 12TF as some people in here have suggested, but it would be 9 or even 10 TF.
 

bitbydeath

Member
I believe it has some relevance. If this turns out to be true, then the new Xbox is not 12TF as some people in here have suggested, but it would be 9 or even 10 TF.

Relevance to AMD hardware internal tests.
It never made sense why Sony would test under Windows and now we know why.
 
How would they be aware of each others specs? What are you talking about? Acting like confidential information is just casually tossed around between fucking competitors.

Christ.
If you dont think MS and Sony havent got wind of each others specs from third party developers you are dreaming. Yes, we lucky ones on an internet forum, or Twitter, get all the good leaks, while MS or Sony with all their people and contacts at AMD and all the other developers dont get shit.
Yeah right. Klee gets info, but not Sony or MS.
 
I don't think you read every post on this thread, you can check my messages history posted in this thread, you gonna find that i was called a fan boy for saying that MS need to release a more powerful console (because they have to).
here is an example above that i posted prior to our argument, you clearly missed it.

When someone says something vague like "it's twice the performance of Xbox one X" doesn't mean its 12TF RDNA, ask AMD why they wasted their time explaining that it's 1.25X GCN, they should said TF is TF.
Everybody know TF is a TF, but we are not discussing this so ....


You are late for this one too, you got beat again :messenger_tears_of_joy:

Will display Tetris very well at 8k.
Everyone has said its 12flops, double the XBOX One Xs power. People who are trying to say it's "GCN" flops are just clowning themselves to make them feel better about their PS5 power levels.
 

Nickolaidas

Member
If you dont think MS and Sony havent got wind of each others specs from third party developers you are dreaming. Yes, we lucky ones on an internet forum, or Twitter, get all the good leaks, while MS or Sony with all their people and contacts at AMD and all the other developers dont get shit.
Yeah right. Klee gets info, but not Sony or MS.
They send each other industrial spies, posing as escorts.


g3HJl66.jpg


"Oh, Phil, baby … tell me again, how many TFs is that X-Box thingie of yours?"
 
Last edited:

HeisenbergFX4

Gold Member
Everyone has said its 12flops, double the XBOX One Xs power. People who are trying to say it's "GCN" flops are just clowning themselves to make them feel better about their PS5 power levels.

Don't you think 12 TFs of RDNA would be higher then double the current X in power? Not saying its not right just seems it would be more then double the actual power.
 

Mass Shift

Member
If you dont think MS and Sony havent got wind of each others specs from third party developers you are dreaming. Yes, we lucky ones on an internet forum, or Twitter, get all the good leaks, while MS or Sony with all their people and contacts at AMD and all the other developers dont get shit.
Yeah right. Klee gets info, but not Sony or MS.


Few people will actually admit to climbing that hypothetical mountain to answer that question because it's far too logical. It's easier to accept Kleegamefan's vague expositions than to face a simple reality.

I admit Klee is saying what I want to hear. But I can't simply just discount all of the numbers that I've seen over the last two days and just accept more vagueness.
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
Everyone has said its 12flops, double the XBOX One Xs power. People who are trying to say it's "GCN" flops are just clowning themselves to make them feel better about their PS5 power levels.

Everyone but Phil himself.

And 12TF RDNA is more than “twice the power of X1X GPU”.

So it’s probably in the 9-10 range RDNA which would equal 12 range of the GCN the 1X is now. Which would be, “we did the math, it’s twice the power”.

You don’t need to “do the math”, if it’s a simple 6+6 = 12. You do the math because the Flop efficiency is no longer the same.

Would love to be surprised with a RDNA 12, however.
 
Last edited:

Darklor01

Might need to stop sniffing glue
Everyone has said its 12flops, double the XBOX One Xs power. People who are trying to say it's "GCN" flops are just clowning themselves to make them feel better about their PS5 power levels.

Please. Enough fanboy panic on both sides. Devs said both are similar in power. I’ll go with that. It’s going to feel like forever between now and whenever official specs are released with all of this XBX vs. PS power level BS.
 

DForce

NaughtyDog Defense Force
Everyone has said its 12flops, double the XBOX One Xs power. People who are trying to say it's "GCN" flops are just clowning themselves to make them feel better about their PS5 power levels.

Who is everyone?

The problem that I'm seeing is that some people *only* want to accept what they want to hear and just ignore everything that might even suggest otherwise.

Alot of the information we're getting is based off of unconfirmed rumored.

Phil said twice the GPU power of the X, but people want to ignore that completely and go with the 12TF unconfirmed rumor.

It's not about people wanting to "feel better about their PS5 power levels" the 12TF GCN = 9TF RDNA literally falls in line with what Phil said about the new Xbox GPU being twice as powerful.
 
For starters, the data he posted was leaked way back in July. This guy is giving second hand old numbers and speculating.
The exact specs for Anaconda and Lockhart were leaked back in January. So AMD testing results dating back to June or July doesnt mean it's out of date.
 

Fake

Gold Member
The exact specs for Anaconda and Lockhart were leaked back in January. So AMD testing results dating back to June or July doesnt mean it's out of date.
If you want to believe from there until now was release just one devkit version, sure. Go on.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom