ethomaz
Banned
I'm not ignoring anything... the article CONFIRMED it is a WD SN530.Why are you ignoring the article and comment from WD which clearly says the opposite?
I'm not ignoring anything... the article CONFIRMED it is a WD SN530.Why are you ignoring the article and comment from WD which clearly says the opposite?
How long does it take on PS4?
I can't tell if you are just daft or trolling, though likely both.I'm not ignoring anything... the article CONFIRMED it is a WD SN530.
Today we posted up an erroneous report stating the Xbox Series X's internal SSD didn't support PCIe 4.0, and that it used a stock WD SN530 SSD. Western Digital has reached out to clarify this is wrong, and the built-in Series X SSD is in fact a customized solution that supports PCIe 4.0.
According to Western Digital, the Xbox Series X's WD SN530 SSD isn't a stock OEM drive that's limited to PCIe Gen3 x4 performance. Instead, the drive has been outfitted with a special ASIC that enables both PCIe Gen3 x4 and Gen4 x2 performance, which allows for up to 3.938 GB of max throughput. For reference, the Series X targets 2.4GB/sec in uncompressed data transfers.
Read more: https://www.tweaktown.com/news/7613...as-custom-asic-to-support-pcie-4-0/index.html
You have to be trolling... it is not possible to be that obtuse.I can't tell if you are just daft or trolling, though likely both.
He's not. He can read and understands what a customized solution entails.Why are you ignoring the article and comment from WD which clearly says the opposite?
I can't tell if you are just daft or trolling, though likely both.
I really appreciate his insight, but I'm honestly not sure why he comes in here. I've only been around a wee bit, but every time he responds people come out of the woodwork to attack him.
They denied claims that it doesn't support a PCIe 4.0 interface. And it does support it, indeed. Doesn't change which SSD it is.I can't tell if you are just daft or trolling, though likely both.
Nope. That FUD thread OP states it uses the stock OEM SN530, this correction states the exact opposite. Maybe logic isn't part of your vocabulary.They denied claims that it doesn't support a PCIe 4.0 interface. And it does support it, indeed. Doesn't change which SSD it is.
I suppose English isn't your mother tongue, hence your confusion while reading it.
I don't understand removing the web browser. Of course it's useful.
There's a web browser setting in the PS5 menue. Looks like they decided to not support it recently then? Doesn't make any sense that it's there with no web browser.
Most PS4 and Switch spoilits come from WebBrowser scripts.I don't understand removing the web browser. Of course it's useful.
There's a web browser setting in the PS5 menue. Looks like they decided to not support it recently then? Doesn't make any sense that it's there with no web browser.
The ASIC chip was modified, but it's the same SSD. Tell yourself it isn't in your own version of "logic", it won't change reality.Nope. That FUD thread OP states it uses the stock OEM SN530, this correction states the exact opposite. Maybe logic isn't part of your vocabulary.
How can it be the same SSD if the ASIC is different? Talk about logic. The ASIC is part of the SSD, not separate.The ASIC chip was modified, but it's the same SSD. Tell yourself it isn't in your own version of "logic", it won't change reality.
No xcloud. Or Luna![]()
Most PS4 and Switch spoilits come from WebBrowser scripts.
keram
![]()
Hangar 51
"Everyday[sic] powerful artifacts are being discovered by people who have no idea what to do with them. Something has to be done." ―Man in suit[src] Hangar 51 was a United States military installation located in Nevada. Officially a storage facility for replacement B-series aircraft parts...indianajones.fandom.com
The PS4 was hacked via webbrowser.What spoilits happened on PS4 that was bad enough to remove the browser?
The lane has the same clock in 3.0 and 4.0 (800Mhz if I'm not wrong) the different is the data transferred is compressed in 4.0 allowing more data to travel... physically PCI-E 3.0 and 4.0 are the same.
How can it be the same SSD if the ASIC is different? Talk about logic. The ASIC is part of the SSD, not separate.
Modified, to connect to the motherboard. Read the linkHow can it be the same SSD if the ASIC is different? Talk about logic. The ASIC is part of the SSD, not separate.
You are right they increased the clock (I just checked the specification)... I will fix my post.PCIe3 uses a clock of 8 GHz and encodes with 128b/130b. Which means for every 130 symbols transmitted, 128 bits of actual data are transmitted. Think of it as encoding not to make the size smaller (it's larger), but more resilient.
So, 128b/130b is a data rate of 0.9846 bit/s. At 8GHz, you are sending 8G*0.9846 bits per lane, or 0.9846 GB/s per lane.
PCIe4 increases the clock to 16 GHz, and uses the same encoding, so it's data rate per lane is doubled.
WD would have changed the ASIC on the drive to support the gen4 clocks, or if supported, changed the FW on the drive to change how the clock is generated internally on the drive to multiply it up to 16 GHz.
Yes, that's right. The only reason to use 2 lanes instead of 4 is, that 2 lanes are much simpler to route and is enough for their desired speed target. It is as simple as that. Just to reduce the cost a bit more with things, they just don't need.
Sounds like they're prioritizing TVs because Sony sells TVs. Of course they'll add in 1440p support after this initial surge of new TV sales.
The PS4 was hacked via webbrowser.
That is how consoles with firmware before a version can be hacked to play homebrew and pirated games.
"Despite an active console hacking community, only few public PlayStation 4 exploits have been released. The exposed WebKit-based browser is usually the entrypoint of a fullchain attack: from browser exploitation to kernel exploitation."
I won't post sources because it come from a hack site.
I still believe it is lazy... instead to constant work with the browser security fixes they choose to remove it.
The PS4 was hacked via webbrowser.
That is how consoles with firmware before a version can be hacked to play homebrew and pirated games.
"Despite an active console hacking community, only few public PlayStation 4 exploits have been released. The exposed WebKit-based browser is usually the entrypoint of a fullchain attack: from browser exploitation to kernel exploitation."
I won't post sources because it come from a hack site.
I still believe it is lazy... instead to constant work with the browser security fixes they choose to remove it.
Sony is slowly turning into Nintendo.
They should work to fix these exploits instead of stopping support of it that's been there for 14 years. MS doesn't seem to have these with Xbox Internet brower.
Which is great
They could just keep the browser updated with the latest WebKit and/or Chromium security fixes.Well they either write their own browser which takes a lot of work or use an open source library like Webkit that's impossible to control. Not worth the risk or time, after what happened.
Sony is slowly turning into Nintendo.
Be honest, you just wanna watch porn without the worry your missus might see it in your browsing history?![]()
The Fastest Most Powerful Xbox Ever.
![]()
Plot twist: the big Sony surprise that people have been teasing is a dedicated Pornhub button which launches you directly into the app!Who didn't watch porn with the PS4 brower. lol.
![]()
Pornhub Year In Review - PS4 Pornhub Usage Is The Highest Among Consoles - PlayStation Universe
he Pornhub year in review is now in and confirms that Pornhub PS4 usage is the highest among all other consoles. Get all the info here.www.psu.com
They could just keep the browser updated with the latest WebKit and/or Chromium security fixes.
That is how MS do it... even more now that Edge is using Chromium too.
These exploits are first released to the browser engines teams to fix before release to public.