You're saying that AMD can't follow similar progress or rather don't want them to, ever heard of "after rain comes sunshine"?
Where is the data to back up this claim of yours? or are we just making stuff up?
I responded to this already, but it seems I have to think for you as well so here goes.
RX 480 in Pro, refreshed, RX 580 and used in XO, Sony could have pushed for more Teraflops but they didn't think of using vapor chamber or even more memory what do you call that lack of vision, stupidity, greed?
As you insinuating that they don't have sales data that possibly lead how they tackled the new consoles, strangest thing - we've never heard of either selling badly yet one might create a more powerful console and so far nothing to debunk those claims (in contrary it's just solidifying).
Its not about money, if a vastly superior arch is available at time of release Sony won't let that go
Since you like to use companies behavior as proof of their future behavior you should know Sony used bleeding edge tech in both the PS4 and Pro revision, they used architecture features that were only later available.
Was that Sony though beside the ID buffer and something else or was that AMD?
Vastly superior is your assumption and wording, we already don't know jackshit about Navi thanks to AMD, we know even less about Arcturus.
This thread is about advanced bla bla by bla bla insiders, I ignored all that initially <--- and said it might be Arcturus because things point to that long before PS5 stuff was announced.
If it's some crazy fanboy shit it would have been debunked left and right (like you are), yet that's not the case so we can go on and on but it's not going anywhere.
I'm leaving it up in the air that there's a possibility.