NFL 2011 Week 10 |OT| Headlines

Status
Not open for further replies.
You know who a ton of people should be eating crow about:

fat-sprint-andre-smith.jpg


Guy has really turned his career around. He was downright impressive for much of the game against Pittsburgh.
 
exarkun said:
from the poor deluded mind of a texans fan... : (

Did squicky just call Kubiak a good coach?
Click to expand...

If I was building a team from zero, I would want Kubiak as my offensive coordinator. I absolutely love the Denver system when it is being run properly. I just want a head coach to be able to come over and make him run it when he gets pass happy.

I mean when you watch football week to week, who gets people wide open like the Texans? It's incredible. Gary's just not a good HC
 
squicken said:
If I was building a team from zero, I would want Kubiak as my offensive coordinator. I absolutely love the Denver system when it is being run properly. I just want a head coach to be able to come over and make him run it when he gets pass happy.

I mean when you watch football week to week, who gets people wide open like the Texans? It's incredible. Gary's just not a good HC
Click to expand...

Packers, Bears, Patriots, Panthers, Saints. 4 of those teams do it without the threat of a running game.

If I had to pick an OC from anywhere in the league I'd go with Jay Gruden or the Chud.
 
yacobod said:
have to be tough playing behind the 2nd worst offensive line in football.
Click to expand...
The line has been decent in the past month or so. Before that we had a shit load of injuries. They are not elite but they are serviceable and not surprisingly the offense has been dominant since they improved their play.
 
eznark said:
WELLINGTON IS BUCKY BROOKS?!!!!!!?????

http://static.nfl.com/static/content/catch_all/nfl_image/bucky_brooks-110726_65.jpg[IMG][/QUOTE]

Hahaha! Holy shit.

:jnc:jnc


[QUOTE=levious]I'm more surprised at him lumping Dilfer in with Bart Starr...

I wish experts would stop comparing completion percentages from the 70's to today though, jesus.[/QUOTE]

I agree with the completion percentages. When you touch a receiver its an automatic penalty now, and back in the 70s receivers would get mugged all game long.
Click to expand...
 
bionic77 said:
The line has been decent in the past month or so. Before that we had a shit load of injuries. They are not elite but they are serviceable and not surprisingly the offense has been dominant since they improved their play.
Click to expand...
For two quarters.

The offense rarely puts together a full game's worth of performance. When they do the never lose, but that's rare. Jags game was a good example of the offense starting hot then tapering.
 
Doomsayer said:
Shots fired?



http://www.nfl.com/news/story/09000...han-a-game-manager?module=HP11_content_stream
Click to expand...
Eli took a shit college team to a bowl game, but let's face it: His first few years he WAS a game manager. No one disputes this on Giants-GAF. However he's gotten better and evolved past that limitation and his responsibilities in the offense have grown. So it's a slight difference in my opinion.

I think what that piece should point to more is were they game managers/average QBs when they won the Superbowl. That's up for debate.
 
DeaconKnowledge said:
For two quarters.

The offense rarely puts together a full game's worth of performance. When they do the never lose, but that's rare. Jags game was a good example of the offense starting hot then tapering.
Click to expand...
Most offenses rarely move the ball on every possession. Remember the defense is trying too.

I think we have a bad habit of getting conservative once we get a lead on both sides of the ball. That to me explains the slow downs on offense moreso than poor offensive line play. The line is playing well, not great but good enough to give us a chance.
 
bionic77 said:
Most offenses rarely move the ball on every possession. Remember the defense is trying too.

I think we have a bad habit of getting conservative once we get a lead on both sides of the ball. That to me explains the slow downs on offense moreso than poor offensive line play. The line is playing well, not great but good enough to give us a chance.
Click to expand...

Nah, I'm not saying they need to move the ball every possession, but I find the Steelers tend to make silly mistakes late, particularly when it comes to penalties on offense and blocking assignments.
 
DeaconKnowledge said:
Nah, I'm not saying they need to move the ball every possession, but I find the Steelers tend to make silly mistakes late, particularly when it comes to penalties on offense and blocking assignments.
Click to expand...
Offense also gets really predictable once we get a lead (which we have had lately at the end of games). I feel like a lot of their failings get exposed with bad coaching. Offense is really geared for dink and dunk to setup runs and a few bombs. When we get away from that the offense and line look bad.
 
ItWasMeantToBe19 said:
Leinhart's 2010 preseason was pretty legendarily bad, that's all I remember of his NFL career.
Click to expand...

THERE'S NO H IN LEINART.

WHY DO YOU PEOPLE STILL FUCK THIS UP. ITS NOT THAT HARD.
 
BaltimoreLarry said:
Any of you jerks play CoD on PS3? I'd love to blast some Steeler and Niner fans
Click to expand...

Buy a better game on a superior platform, peasant.


In fact, the perfect post-divorce project would be to build a bad ass gaming rig.
 
eznark said:
Packers, Bears, Patriots, Panthers, Saints. 4 of those teams do it without the threat of a running game.

If I had to pick an OC from anywhere in the league I'd go with Jay Gruden or the Chud.
Click to expand...


Panther ranked 8.
Bears ranked 13.
 
eznark said:
Ranked what at what, where?
Click to expand...

Rushing.

Panthers are good offensive football team with equal threat of running and passing.
Bears are more Run than Pass, especially after the bye and the new winning ways.

Even Saints have a running threat.
 
beast786 said:
Rushing.

Panthers are good offensive football team with equal threat of running and passing.
Bears are more Run than Pass, especially after the bye and the new winning ways.
Click to expand...

I never claimed the Bears had a bad rushing team. I was unaware that the Panthers were 8. Is that based on yards or what? How much of that is Newton?
 
eznark said:
Buy a better game on a superior platform, peasant.


In fact, the perfect post-divorce project would be to build a bad ass gaming rig.
Click to expand...
PCs are for poor losers who don't wash themselves.

Macs are for beautiful rich people who want to create something.

We never had the smartphone or OS wars in here, let's see. how many idiots respond
 
eznark said:
I never claimed the Bears had a bad rushing team. I was unaware that the Panthers were 8. Is that based on yards or what? How much of that is Newton?
Click to expand...

I would say its the other way around. Earlier especially, people force panthers to throw the ball by run blitzing and stacking the box. Newton took the advantage of having a good running game.

6th overall avg and 8th for total.

Even saints have a running threat. I would say only Packers and Patriots are one dimensional truly. And the only teams with passing so good that can get away with it. Especially your team
 
Pretty interesting that the Bears are 6th in the NFL in points/game. The 49ers are 7th. GB, NO, NE, DET, and HOU round out the top 5.
 
eznark said:
I never claimed the Bears had a bad rushing team. I was unaware that the Panthers were 8. Is that based on yards or what? How much of that is Newton?
Click to expand...

8th is based on Rush YPG. Football Outsiders (I know, you think their stats are trash) rank us 3rd in rush offense. I think a lot of it has to do with Newton being a run/pass threat (emphasis on showing that's he's a legitimate pass threat which has forced some teams to stop stacking the box). The problem is, we tend to abandon the run (besides called runs for Newton) early, either because we fall behind or because Chud falls in love with the pass game (Newton shouldn't regularly be throwing 40 times per game, especially considering we have been competitive in every game except for the last one).
 
yacobod said:
Pretty interesting that the Bears are 6th in the NFL in points/game. The 49ers are 7th. GB, NO, NE, DET, and HOU round out the top 5.
Click to expand...
i believe Houston is the only team in the top five in points allowed and points scored per game.


wow bunch of crap games this week, only game midly interested in would be balt v cincy, glad ill be traveling on sunday.
 
yacobod said:
On Football Outsiders the top 5 Defenses in the League are:

1. BAL
2. NYJ
3. JAC
4. DET
5. CHI

Surprised SF isn't in the top 5.
Click to expand...

We give up a ton of yards, so it makes sense. Jacksonville is a surprise to me, but then I seen they haven't had a QB with 100+ passer rating this season? That defense desperately needs an offense.

Oh yeah, and Football Outsiders is trash.


BaltimoreLarry said:
I'm not. They're overrated and in reality, very average.
Click to expand...

You are really adamant on trolling, and you aren't very good at it. I would troll the Ravens, but I think the Seahawks did a great job this weekend.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

  • Poll
NFL '24/'25 |OT| #FreeCheetah Edition 🐆💨
7 8 9 10 11
543
19K
Men_in_Boxes replied
2024 NFL Draft Day Thread |OT|
31
2K
AJUMP23 replied
Oscars 2025 |OT|
2
75
4K
Zathalus replied
NFL being played in the UK
Event 
14
1K
Smiggs replied
TV Shows You’ve Watched Lately |OT| - 2025
|OT| Community  2 3 4
151
7K
AJUMP23 replied
Top Bottom