• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

NFL 2011 Week 8 |OT| Tim Tebow

Status
Not open for further replies.

mr. puppy

Banned
Godslay said:
Come on man, that's not what they said. They said Tebow played bad, but there are other problems as well.




I'm afraid so. I'm starting to think Elway has the pawns in place.


Last week Tim Tebow threw to Tim Tebow for 2 TDs then Tim Tebow kicked a field goal in OT.

This week, the O-Line was the reason for the 52 sacks and not Tim Tebow taking 15 minutes to throw the ball.
 

squicken

Member
So many of these team with shitty QBs do them no favors by throwing then out there with no help. Cam and Dalton and Sanchize and Ryan all started out so well b/c they had good targets.

Bradford and Gabbert may suck, but no one is going to make Mike Simms-Walker look like he belongs on an NFL roster
 

Sanjuro

Member
Tom Penny said:
They went 18-1 because of they're offense . A whole 14 points in the SB. They ran 16 times and threw 48. Baltimore was debacle. The Jets game they played nickel and dime the whole game and they never ran. They instead threw against it or had the awesome 10 minute drive with Woodhead as the primary back. O'brien is an idiot. Not sure what to tell you.
We played against a Giants team who I don't believe were the "better" team, but they were playing with lightning in a bottle similar to our 2001. They would have lost 4/5 times, but they played an incredible game and was one of the best Super Bowls ever.

The Ravens game you are correct about.

We had 117 yards rushing against the Jets. I don't know what you are talking about.
 

Trasher

Member
beast786 said:
Was it a karma pick?! I don't get it. I thought he said he picked the Lions to win 44-14! TRAITOR!!!!!!!
 
Alligatorjandro said:
The defense looks good at time but those times are few and far between.As for the receivers they need a clear #1.

My hope for the draft is they get a WR and a hybrid OLB/DE with the 2 1st rounders.

Runningback and Corner in the first. Drafting Genius.

Could have had Dez Bryant and Clay Matthews btw, but traded those picks.
 

Sanjuro

Member
jman2050 said:
This is what you wanted to say. It's not 2004 anymore, it's 2011. Things change.
You are probably trolling, but if we are talking about Brady you are wrong. Our offense has changed. We have serviceable players and some downright nasty TEs. It's still not the same however you can't take the ball away from Brady. He will win more games than lose.
 

overcast

Member
squicken said:
So many of these team with shitty QBs do them no favors by throwing then out there with no help. Cam and Dalton and Sanchize and Ryan all started out so well b/c they had good targets.

Bradford and Gabbert may suck, but no one is going to make Mike Simms-Walker look like he belongs on an NFL roster
Bradford is much better than Gabbert.
 

TheFatOne

Member
Sanjuro Tsubaki said:
We played against a Giants team who I don't believe were the "better" team, but they were playing with lightning in a bottle similar to our 2001. They would have lost 4/5 times, but they played an incredible game and was one of the best Super Bowls ever.

The Ravens game you are correct about.

We had 117 yards rushing against the Jets. I don't know what you are talking about.

That 07 Giants team was better. Their dline raped one of the best offensive teams ever. You might say they were less talented, but you can't say they weren't better. They held the Pats to only 14 points in the biggest game of the year, and their offense made plays when it counted. They were the better team.
 

Fox318

Member
Dutch Patriot said:
Runningback and Corner in the first. Drafting Genius.

Could have had Dez Bryant and Clay Matthews btw, but traded those picks.
With the Patriots cap they could go after some free agents too.
 

Tom Penny

Member
Sanjuro Tsubaki said:
We played against a Giants team who I don't believe were the "better" team, but they were playing with lightning in a bottle similar to our 2001. They would have lost 4/5 times, but they played an incredible game and was one of the best Super Bowls ever.

The Ravens game you are correct about.

We had 117 yards rushing against the Jets. I don't know what you are talking about.

Garbage time stats. Again. I think the shotgun spread they constantly use suck big cock. When it's not working you need to switch up. You apparently disagree so there isn't much to discuss.
 

Sanjuro

Member
TheFatOne said:
That 07 Giants team was better. Their dline raped one of the best offensive teams ever. You might say they were less talented, but you can't say they weren't better. They held the Pats to only 14 points in the biggest game of the year, and their offense made plays when it counted. They were the better team.
I said they were the better team ultimately. Most Giants fans I know felt the same way I did about 2001. I'm not putting them down, but you have to transport yourself into a Giants fan's shoes in 2007. Even after getting to the Super Bowl in impressive fashion the mismatch was still there.
 
Rated-Rsuperstar said:
Steelers executed perfectly today. They controlled the clock, exploited the Pats secondary, and kept Brady off the field. Their only mistake was that early interception.

And Arians trying to make it interesting at the very end for some reason.
 
Oh God, Balt/Pitt is coming.

Bionic, I believe we put an avatar bet on the books weeks ago. Joe Flacco's elite face is going to look good next to your name.
 

WanderingWind

Mecklemore Is My Favorite Wrapper
Kusagari said:
John Beck has never won a game in his career.

Why is this man starting?

Because Buffalo needed to ease back into 1st place in the AFC East. It was a rough bye week for them, they needed the practice game before next week.
 

Sanjuro

Member
Tom Penny said:
Garbage time stats. Again. I think the shotgun spread they constantly use suck big cock. When it's not working you need to switch up. You apparently disagree so there isn't much to discuss.
Of course I disagree. I'm not telling you we don't need to run the ball. I'm not telling you our offensive gameplan is ideal. What I'm telling you is we have Tom Brady at the quarterback position. We have Danny Woodhead, Ben Jarvis-Green Ellis, and Kevin Faulk at the RB position. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure the rest out.

We don't have Corey Dillon. We don't even have Antowain Smith.
 

jman2050

Member
Sanjuro Tsubaki said:
Of course I disagree. I'm not telling you we don't need to run the ball. I'm not telling you our offensive gameplan is ideal. What I'm telling you is we have Tom Brady at the quarterback position. We have Danny Woodhead, Ben Jarvis-Green Ellis, and Kevin Faulk at the RB position. You don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure the rest out.

We don't have Corey Dillon. We don't even have Antowain Smith.

You still have to pretend to run the football you know.
 
Probably too early, but looking at the 49ers schedule, they should be able to get the 2nd seed in the NFC and a first-round bye.

And looking at the Colts schedule, I don't see how they win a game. It's a bunch of division rivals that will be taking out their old frustrations as well as good teams. The only game that's not is against Carolina, looks like 0-16.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom