I would take Kolb over almost any QB in the league. I cant understand anyone knocking him.
.
I would take Kolb over almost any QB in the league. I cant understand anyone knocking him.
GAF has search, I would love to see a post by me saying anything even close to that, but we both know no such post exists. You really shouldnt steal FMT's bit.
Miami Dolphins, 6-10
Buffalo Bills, 6-10
Cleveland Browns, 4-12
Indianapolis Colts, 2-14
Jacksonville Jaguars, 5-11
Washington Redskins, 5-11
Minnesota Vikings, 3-13
Tampa Bay Buccaneers, 4-12
Carolina Panthers, 6-10
St. Louis Rams, 2-14
New England Patriots, 13-3
Pittsburgh Steelers, 12-4
Baltimore Ravens, 12-4
Houston Texans, 10-6
Green Bay Packers, 15-1
Detroit Lions, 10-6
Atlanta Falcons, 10-6
New Orleans Saints, 13-3
San Francisco 49ers, 13-3
Thanks for posting this. Love Prince to death and Tom Petty just rode the wave. Awesome.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_2tSGxGnJQ
I . . . I feel so ashamed for not knowing this existed. I hate tribute albums and concerts so I guess I never would have thought to ever listen. Sooooo awesome. Prince is a got damned boss
Can the college football regulars tell me something about Hightower/Chandler? I'd really love to see some improvements on the defensive side, not just a scrap heap of players who can barely tackle...
Can the college football regulars tell me something about Hightower/Chandler Jones? I'd really love to see some improvements on the defensive side, not just a scrap heap of players who can barely tackle...
Thanks for posting this. Love Prince to death and Tom Petty just rode the wave. Awesome.
The Packers could go 11-5 and still have a good year. But that's a -4 win differential. To me, the obvious drop off teams are CIN and SF. The two obvious move up teams are STL and IND
I would take a goat over almost any QB in the league
Of course you would, have to have something to sacrifice to your dark lord and master.
At least they dont take pigs unlike some Pittsburgh qb named ben.
I'd love to see the Browns win more than 4 games for once.
I really think the Rats are due for a slide, but I can't entirely trust myself because I want them to shit the bed.
It seems to be lining up pretty well though; Suggs gone, Lewis turns 82 this year and Reed is broken down and disgruntled. Flacco. They're also starting to develop the O-line trouble the Steelers have been battling with for years. By all accounts they're due for a poor season.
Whats a surprise team?
I think the Vikings will scrape together 6 wins. Thats not good but they will be doubling their win column over last years train wreck.
Seems he'll be a decent QB, but , no.
He has a high upside if he can get in a little better shape and keeps his head on straight. Not counting injuries, if he does that he should turn out pretty good.
He's just not to the point of taking him over top 10 QBs based on merit at this point.
He's completed 1 season out of 3. And 2 of those 3 seasons he's averaged a pick per game or more.....with CJ.
Does not compute.
Yeah but you guys just re-signed Max Starks. And you've got age issues as well. Ben looked really bad last year when he got hurt. The first time he really seemed unable to deal with an injury. If ez's team just had a better QB they could really scary
Max Starks is a depth signing. And he's lightyears ahead of Jonathan Scott, who got abused worse than any lineman i've ever seen against the Colts of all teams in week 2 last year.
Also, the age issues have been wildly overblown. The 3 oldest guys on the team were all cut this offseason (Farrior, Smith, and Ward). If anything the Steelers will be inexperienced on opening day. Shy of Keisel, the D-Line has been completely rebuilt.
Also, interesting Factoid - The average age of the Steelers O-line right now is 24.
Steelers are now the second youngest offense in the league.
The only weakness of the Steelers FO is the refusal to address the OL.
Big Ben isn't invincible!
This after 6 years of Ben getting pummeled from every angle because of clowns like Legursky having to play late in the season.They drafted the best guard in the draft and a 2nd round tackles this year, and then picked up Pouncey a few years ago. They really have done alot for the O-line recently
The only weakness of the Steelers FO is the refusal to address the OL.
Big Ben isn't invincible!
This has always been true, yes.squicken said:Prince is a got damned boss
Max Starks is a depth signing. And he's lightyears ahead of Jonathan Scott, who got abused worse than any lineman i've ever seen against the Colts of all teams in week 2 last year.
Also, the age issues have been wildly overblown. The 3 oldest guys on the team were all cut this offseason (Farrior, Smith, and Ward). If anything the Steelers will be inexperienced on opening day. Shy of Keisel, the D-Line has been completely rebuilt.
Also, interesting Factoid - The average age of the Steelers O-;ine right now is 24.
Steelers are now the second youngest offense in the league.
Yeah, at 30, Ben, Cotchery, and Starks are now the oldest guys on offense. And two of them possibly won't be starters. And I will cheer greatly if Scott gets perma-benched or, better yet, waxed entirely before the season starts.
They may have a couple age issues on D where there will probably be 5 or 6 starters who are over 30. The only concerns I have there are Harrison (his back) and Foote (his mediocrity.) I bet Foote loses his starting job at some point.
The Packers could go 11-5 and still have a good year. But that's a -4 win differential. To me, the obvious drop off teams are CIN and SF. The two obvious move up teams are STL and IND
SF can go 10-6 and still win the division. Which I think they will. But that's a 3 win drop off. The flier bet to take is the Colts winning the AFCS.
First, some definitions:
I'll define a successful NFL season as one in which a team wins ten games or more. In the ten-year, 32-team era (2002 thru 2011), 37 teams have ended the regular season with a record of 10-6. 32 of them made the playoffs and the five that missed were in the hunt to the last game. Only one team with more than ten wins failed to get into the post season party.
An unsuccessful season is one in which a team loses ten games or more. Any fan that has suffered through a ten-loss season will agree.
A surprise team goes from a ten-or-more loss season to ten-or-more wins in the next season. A disappointment team is just the opposite, going from winning ten or more, to winning six or fewer the next season.
You obviously didn't read the article:
Problem with Foote is that he'll be calling the D. I love Timmons, but the guy is stuck in 4th gear. He has the talent to be the best ILB in the league but nothing between the ears. He should have stepped up and learned the signals years ago. The Steelers allergy to even mention teaching them to him confirms him being a meathead.
Damn. Didn't know that. But who is your new stud 3-4 OLB to replace a declining Harrison? Or is he going to Germany for HGH blood enriching like everyone else?
But otherwise I always love the Steelers FO. They just do such a good job building a roster. To pick a nit I guess your offense could use a RB who plays better in space
I'm hoping a young guy, like Ivy or Sylvester, develops some chops there. I'd like to include Spence but he'll be a long, long way from seeing anything other than special teams.
So I just read this article on "Surprise" and "Disappointment" teams and I thought I'd share it here.
What do you guys think? Who off this list:
will be a surprise team.
And who off this list:
will be a disappointment team?
I'd go with Tampa/Carolina and New Orleans/Houston.
The Michael Vick autobiography will the first book I will read in 15 years.
I'm gonna say Carolina (yeah, I'm biased, but I also believe it!) and Buffalo for surprise teams and New Orleans and Detroit for disappointment teams.
Actually I read that from initial reports Spence is a bookworm and he's been a quick study, ala Pouncey three years ago. He needs to gain like 20 pounds though.
I like Sylvester, but it seems at times they forget he's even on the team. Not a good sign.
I think it was just him saying the Eagles are a talented team that needs to work hard to make the playoffs and win a Super Bowl.Wait he says he sees "dynasty" potential for the Eagles? oh boy
edit: I love Cam's potential but Brees is too good for them to be sub .500. ATL would really have to fall off and the Bucs stay the Bucs to go to 10 wins. It's just usually the teams in the bad divisions that make those leaps