Dutch Gronk
Banned
Anything interesting shown?
The biggest innovation in book reading ever.
Anything interesting shown?
Ubisoft has a third person shooter hidden as an interesting action game set in Chicago.Anything interesting shown?
Sony discontinued the Vita.
Oh, and Last of Us is a third person shooter.Fucking Sony
Yeah that looks awesome.Ubisoft has a third person shooter hidden as an interesting action game set in Chicago.
I think that game has high bust potential. It seems interesting now, plus they've at least done a good job of capturing the exterior of Chicago (although apparently the Chicago Theater is now a shitty club). That intersection was a pretty accurate representation of Clark and Lake - other than the random gas station.Yeah that looks awesome.
Since it's a PS360/PC game it *could* get a Wii U version.
But it's been in development for 2 years so, I don't know.
I'll get the PC version if it comes to that.
Basically no new consoles until 2015 at this rate. Usually they show these things two years before.
Basically no new consoles until 2015 at this rate. Usually they show these things two years before.
Waiting till when?Maybe Sony is waiting to announce stuff for the Vita
I'm looking forward to Sony's next handheld. I assume it will be announced at TGS this year.
Snoozefest of an E3.
MSFT doesn't need to do anything at this point in the cycle. They won. They are going to keep selling consoles in this gen. Thy may very well be $100 by this time next year and anyone who doesn't have one will get one (except for the hardcore haters). But let's face it: they don't even need to show up to E3. Another Halo? Check. Another Forza? Check. Another Gears? Check. Another Fable (and oh by the way let's check Kinect off in there too)? Check. More entertainment options? Check.
It was a victory lap.
Did Sony show anything of interest other than The Last of Us? They may very well catch up to Wii at some point in this gen just because the WiiU is gonna consume the last of the Wii purchasers.
The big grenade tossed into the midst of this thing is the WiiU. Will it succeed? It will be interesting to see if Ninty has hit the sweet spot again. They are obviously going to have at least a 1 year head start on MSFT and Sony. The question is whether there are enough people who are ready to buy into the next gen... without at least knowing what MSFT or Sony will offer.
Who besides clueless trolls thinks the Wii U can't run high end PS3 games?If the WiiU can't run high end 3rd party PS3 games then how is it next gen? I mean I hope they surprise me but all the lead up seems to indicate it's nothing special on the tech end.
Wii U is going to have a 2 to 3 year head start on the next 360 and PS3. That's absurd.
What kind of bizzaro world are we living in where a Nintendo system is going to have bar none the best graphics for a number of years?
Well, that depends on the developers.We're not even sure at this point if it'll have the best graphics of the current generation.
We're not even sure at this point if it'll have the best graphics of the current generation.
Well, that depends on the developers.
Oh come on.It depends on wither or not Nintendo puts out good hardware.
Which they won't.
I expect the next Roku to be more powerful than the Wii U.
It depends on wither or not Nintendo puts out good hardware.
Which they won't.
I expect the next Roku to be more powerful than the Wii U.
It IS superior.I thought we knew for sure that it was at the very least at parity with the PS3 and most likely superior.
I thought we knew for sure that it was at the very least at parity with the PS3 and most likely superior.
You do realize this is Nintendo that we're talking about? They will do what they can to make money on their hardware. I genuinely hope people do not expect Wii U to provide anything more than an incremental increase over current generation console hardware. I think comments that the system won't be as powerful as a 360/PS3 are about as silly as it gets but I also think people living in this cloud where Nintendo releases an actual "next generation" console that will push Samaritan demo levels of power need to wake up to reality.wienke said:I can't imagine it wouldn't, I mean, the graphics output of a PS3 and a 360 is 6-7 years old at this point. You can buy dirty cheap graphics cards for a PC at retail that would be superior and barely affect the BOM of a system.
We're not even sure at this point if it'll have the best graphics of the current generation.
The only specific reports on power have come from anonymous developers, who may or may not have received money hats from either side and thus should be ignored.I'm actually not trolling. I thought there were conflicting reports on its power. Weren't there also a few multi-platform games that got cancelled?
Graphics look fantastic, gameplay looks routine. Pass! (well, more accurately, "will need to see more")I've told myself not to get excited about another Star Wars game, but this Stars Wars 1313 game looks incredible visually. It's running on PC, but it's like the Rebel Assault successor we've always hoped for.
Random ass site: http://gamingeverything.com/22382/first-star-wars-1313-footage/
Just compare components (CPUs, GPUs) to where they were 4 years ago, much less 6 years ago when the PS3 came out.
That's the only time they did that, Wii U is new custom designed hardware.Look what was available when the Wii launched, and all they did was gussy up the GC hardware. They get no benefit of the doubt from me on the spec front.
Well to be fair I don't think they need much of any benefit in saying the Wii U is 2 to 3 times as powerful. That's not exactly difficult to accomplish with relatively cheap hardware. It also won't amount to much as developers continue to focus on 360/PS3 titles moving forward and porting those games to the Wii U (while maybe taking advantage of the tablet).squicken said:They get no benefit of the doubt from me on the spec front.
That's well and good but Nintendo is out of the technological arms race. They themselves admitted as much with the Wii. They seem content to deliver profitable hardware and carve out a niche in which to sell their games. There's nothing wrong with that either. I just don't think the gimmick will be as appealing the second time around and the long term prospects for the system once true next generation development begins worries me.snesfreak said:That's the only time they did that, Wii U is new custom designed hardware.
That's the only time they did that, Wii U is new custom designed hardware.
The GC was a reasonably powered machine, which made it look even worse than it would've otherwise. But what I'm really saying is 2012 version of the Wii (e.g. cheap as poop) will still be clearly superior to the PS3/360 -- in the same way the Wii is superior to the original Xbox.Look what was available when the Wii launched, and all they did was gussy up the GC hardware. They get no benefit of the doubt from me on the spec front.
I think Nintendo's bet is probably that the technological arms race is over, and the PC won.Well to be fair I don't think they need much of any benefit in saying the Wii U is 2 to 3 times as powerful. That's not exactly difficult to accomplish with relatively cheap hardware. It also won't amount to much as developers continue to focus on 360/PS3 titles moving forward and porting those games to the Wii U (while maybe taking advantage of the tablet).
That's well and good but Nintendo is out of the technological arms race. They themselves admitted as much with the Wii. They seem content to deliver profitable hardware and carve out a niche in which to sell their games. There's nothing wrong with that either. I just don't think the gimmick will be as appealing the second time around and the long term prospects for the system once true next generation development begins worries me.
The GC was a reasonably powered machine, which made it look even worse than it would've otherwise. But what I'm really saying is 2012 version of the Wii (e.g. cheap as poop) will still be clearly superior to the PS3/360 -- in the same way the Wii is superior to the original Xbox.
I think Nintendo's bet is probably that the technological arms race is over, and the PC won.
You're still pissy cause the Vita is dead!eznark said:All of you taking this conversation seriously......get out
That's the only time they did that, Wii U is new custom designed hardware.
You're still pissy cause the Vita is dead!
I know that feeling
Oh you.I can't wait till Nintendo hires back Cammie Dunaway and gets back to their real target demographic: QVC shoppers and the people you see on peopleofwalmart.com.
The GC was a reasonably powered machine, which made it look even worse than it would've otherwise. But what I'm really saying is 2012 version of the Wii (e.g. cheap as poop) will still be clearly superior to the PS3/360 -- in the same way the Wii is superior to the original Xbox.
.
I can't wait till Nintendo hires back Cammie Dunaway and gets back to their real target demographic: QVC shoppers and the people you see on peopleofwalmart.com.
2013!I can't wait till Nintendo hires back Cammie Dunaway and gets back to their real target demographic: QVC shoppers and the people you see on peopleofwalmart.com.
Sure, but there are terribad games for every platform.But there are numerous XBOX 1 games that look better than a whole lot of Wii games. I hope you guys are right. I want to give Nintendo my money for making a quality product. Something I haven't done since the N64
To be honest, the differences between the Wii and the PS3/360 were made doubly evident due to HDTVs becoming so common.I think Nintendo's bet is probably that the technological arms race is over, and the PC won.