Unhandled Exception
Member
Between XCom and SFV I'm just not going to have free time for the next several months.
The NHL was in a bind here. It was impossible to know Wideman’s motivations when he hit Henderson, but something bad happened, and the league, under pressure from the referees’ union, had to find someone or something at fault. Accepting Wideman’s concussion defense would have been a dangerous precedent, and pushed that fault over to the NHL itself. Colin Campbell dodged that thornbush altogether when he cited a rule with a mandatory suspension, which necessarily had to ascribe malice to Wideman’s actions. The league did not have to give Wideman 20 games, but it looks a hell of a lot better for the NHL if it makes it appear it had no choice.
Deadspin posted a write-up about the Wideman decision, and this part stood out to me:
this whole thing makes me feel uncomfortable with how the NHL is handling it
This is the only professional sports team that has this f**king ridiculous rule...
Well, I don't think things are quite that dire as of yet.It feels like the Rags have been on a slow death march and we're now seeing the beginning of it. Trading away Duclair was only going to speed it up a bit. Also that blue line looks like they're going to get old and busted overnight.
Simply "something bad happened" isn't really fair to the situation imo:It was impossible to know Widemans motivations when he hit Henderson, but something bad happened, and the league, under pressure from the referees union, had to find someone or something at fault.
His own explanation is impossible to reconcile with what actually happened. He had his head up, was obviously frustrated, got his hands and stick up (not in a brace for impact kind of way either) and obviously hit him deliberately. Malice is safe to assume. Beside the fact that it's difficult to confuse zebra stripes with an NHL jersey, he doesn't mention at all that he thought it was someone else.I was just trying to get off the ice. And, at the last second, I looked up and saw him, said Wideman post-game. I couldnt avoid it. I didnt know where to go or how to get out of the way of him.
but you know what you REALLY need? to trade a bunch of picks for Staal and Campbell
Only if you give us John Scott first! We can give you, uh, Tanner Glass!
-snip-
I was hoping for a more in-depth response, but whatever
No worries, I'll do better next time.
"Death march" is definitely exaggerating the severity. It does feel like they won't get on a legit run until they unload some of those D contracts as well as Nash. Just gotta make sure Hank never runs out of smoothies until then.
The following is my midseason assessment of the crop of players available this June for the 2016 NHL draft, including an overall assessment of the class and profiles of my top 30 prospects.
I have seen just about every player listed in the top 30 live in the past six months, and many of them several times; additionally, I have regular conversations with scouts and executives. My analysis incorporates this information on top of statistics, adjusted for age, league, position, randomness, other important contextual information and any other important background information I've procured on a prospect.
The 2016 draft class is one I'd describe as average. Top prospect Auston Matthews is a standard No. 1 overall prospect, arguably with a lean to being above-average in that cohort. The top 3-5 group is good, with this draft lacking a little bit on the depth side toward the end of the first and into the middle of the second round. This is a very strong draft class for the USA and Finland, and one of the weakest Canadian crops in a long time.
The biggest shakeup has been the play of Patrik Laine during the past 12 months. Six months ago, I'd have said it's unlikely the first overall pick would require deep thought, but he has put himself in the conversation. Between all the prospect rankings I have done, for draft-eligible or drafted players, this was one of the hardest top overall prospect rankings I have done. It matches Taylor Hall vs. Tyler Seguin in 2010, and the four-player debate atop the 2013 draft. This is due to Laine's consistent high level of play, and game-breaking attributes on display at the world under-18 championship last spring, through league play this season, and including his dominant world junior championship play.
Now on to the top 30 prospects for the 2016 draft class. Tiers for me would be the top two players, then No. 3 Jesse Puljujarvi in his own tier, followed by Nos. 4-10 being a tier.
1. Auston Matthews, C, ZCS (NLA)
DOB: 9/17/97 | Ht: 6-2 | Wt: 194
GP: 30 | G: 23 | A: 15
Matthews is a prospect of equivalent talent to Buffalo's Jack Eichel at the time of Eichel being drafted, and is the favorite to be picked first. Matthews' pure skill level is the highest in this draft class. The things he can do with the puck border on freakish, considering his frame. He also has above-average speed and great hockey IQ. He has been on a tear in the NLA since returning from the WJC. While some may scoff at the league and say his numbers aren't impressive in a global sense, recent studies have shown the NLA has actually surpassed the top Finnish league, and is nearly on par with the AHL, with many ex-NHLers making Switzerland their post-North America destination.
2. Patrik Laine, LW, Tampere (Liiga)
DOB: 4/19/98 | Ht: 6-4 | Wt: 207
GP: 33 | G: 13 | A: 14
Laine possesses elite skill, an elite power game and an elite shot. This combination of attributes makes him an absolute nightmare to check, and has allowed him to dominate the high-skill environments like the WJC, and the more physical, fast-paced environments like Finland's top professional league. His shot generation is off-the-charts good for a 17-year-old in the Liiga. His play has created a reasonable argument to be in the discussion to be picked first overall, and I would not find fault with an NHL team for doing just that this summer.
3. Jesse Puljujarvi, RW, Karpat (Liiga)
DOB: 5/7/98 | Ht: 6-3 | Wt: 201
GP: 39 | G: 8 | A: 11
On top of having the second-highest scoring total ever by a player his age at the WJC, Puljujarvi has been one of the best 17-year-olds in Finland's top league in recent years. He's an exciting prospect who skates incredibly well for a big man, displays good skill and coordination, and has a good shot as well. Puljujarvi's defensive play isn't perfect yet, but he's adept at competing for pucks along the boards. For me, he's quite not on the same level as Matthews and Laine, but has made a clear distinction between himself and the rest of the pack.
4. Clayton Keller, C, USNTDP (USHL)
DOB: 7/29/98 | Ht: 5-10 | Wt: 170
GP: 39 | G: 27 | A: 49
Keller's production for the USA under-18 team can be ranked with the all-time greats like Matthews, Eichel, Phil Kessel and Patrick Kane. He has been great during USHL and college games he has taken part in for the NTDP, and should contend for the top player award at the upcoming five nations under-18 tournament. Keller is a dynamic scorer with top-end skating and skill on top of being an excellent passer. He's undersized at 5-foot-10 and not overly physical, but does show commitment to defensive play. The size is a concern that attaches risk to his projection, but I see Keller having the potential to be a game-breaking forward.
5. Matthew Tkachuk, LW, London (OHL)
DOB: 12/11/97 | Ht: 6-1 | Wt: 194
GP: 38 | G: 16 | A: 54
Keith's son has done nothing but succeed at every level for the past few years, including this season in the OHL and at the WJC. He's a potential top-line winger at the NHL level, with high-end skill, great vision and hockey IQ, and a willingness to compete for pucks as hard as any prospect on this list. Any scout you talk to about him comes back raving about his hockey sense. He's not just his father's son; he's a guy who creates from the sideboards and has eyes in the back of his head.
Bergevin: can you speak french tho?
Carlyle: um... bonjour?
Bergevin: fuck it you're hired
Great write-up about the state of the Rangers moving forward.
Kings vs Quacks tonight should be good.
Is this on NBCSN? I hope this'll be fun.
Is this on NBCSN? I hope this'll be fun.
Isn't Boucher an actually good coach, unlike those other humps? I always had the impression that, in so far as advanced metrics can measure coaching, he did a pretty good job in Tampa.
So you can strike him off the list of potentials I'm sure.
Are we ducks?
...or what?
Who you gonna cheer for
Surprised to see him legitimately entertaining Laine as #1.Pronman with his first update of the top 30 draft eligible's this season.
CTL-F "Marner"
No results found. Wow, that must have been tough for him.
I stopped at the top 5 to troll Leaf fans, he has Alex Nylander at six and everyone knows the Leafs are going to lose the lottery and pick like seventh or something. Two spots above the Jets.
My prediction for the next 3 Habs coaches:
Guy Boucher
Alain Vigneault
Patrick Roy
Boucher first and then whoever is available from firing in the future between Vigneault and Roy.
This. Dude is a good tactician and like I've mentioned here, he's coached Subban, Price and Patches in the AHL.I think I read that he had below league average goal tending for his entire tenure in Tampa. Everyone only remembers him for the 1-3-1, but I'm pretty sure he only did that to make up for his teams weakness.
We have a new leader in the sadness rankings:
Hahahahahaha good oneHypothetically, what if the Habs don't hire a french coach? Who should we get?
we're #1! GO HABS GO!
Hypothetically, what if the Habs don't hire a french coach? Who should we get?
Also if Guy Boucher doesn't wanna be coach, should we hire an complete unknown?
:lol :lolBarclays Center CEO on obstructed seats at Islanders games: "You can watch the game on your mobile device."
It's definitely not just bad luck, that terrible stretch they went through dominating teams and losing has destroyed their confidence. They're not on the same page, taking weak shots from the perimeter. They're done with Therrien, it's pretty obvious. I wouldn't be against trading guys like Plekanec or Markov, but their value is at their lowest right now, this is why I said they should have traded them last season.Hard to believe this is the same Habs team that made the Conference Finals in 2014. They've won 5 out of their last 26 games. With such a sample size, I don't think you can call it a string of bad luck anymore. They may have to take a hard look at the core players. I don't think they're at the "trade Kessel" part though.
Hard to believe this is the same Habs team that made the Conference Finals in 2014. They've won 5 out of their last 26 games. With such a sample size, I don't think you can call it a string of bad luck anymore. They may have to take a hard look at the core players. I don't think they're at the "trade Kessel" part though.
:lol :lol
Well, correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't the game be blacked out on mobile? So technically they can't watch the game on their mobile device?
You want to be lower on that chart dude!
Habs should have hired someone like Benoit Groulx, Eric Veilleux, or Jean-Francois Houle for St John's years ago.
Or the team that had an 80 Pts% in the first 26 games this season. This goes beyond swings of luck, it's more like some voodoo shit at this stage. Never seen such a tale of two teams.
Someone please tell him that blackouts exist:lol :lol
Doubt that happens, he's had to deal with some kind of injury at the end of every season for the past 3 years.If he stays healthy, Price could play for another 8 years at a high level.