SpectreFire
Member
Kassian played with top end talent for around 7 games in the entire season, and had little powerplay time. Cody Hodgson played with top end talent for the majority of the season, and had plenty of top powerplay time. It doesn't take an idiot to figure out how or why Hodgson scored more.Oh yeah because Kassian didnt get the chance to play with top end talent, yeah playing with the Sedins didnt do nothing for his stats as well. At least Hodgson didnt suck after 2 weeks for the coach to take him off the top line.
You are kidding yourself if you think Kassian has the same offensive skills and tools as Hodgson, they are complety different players.
How about let's break some math into it.
Hodgson at EV playing with top end talent (Vanek):
9G 9A 18Pts 425TOI
Kassian at EV playing with top end talent (H. Sedin):
4G 1A 5Pts 123TOI
Now if you scale up Kassian's TOI in the top line with Hodgson's, it projects a lot more favourably:
14G 3A 17Pts 425TOI
If Kassian stayed with the Sedins for the majority of the season like Hodgson did with Vanek, he would've been on a pace to score a lot more EV goals while keeping pace in points. Hell, they both matched each other pretty evenly during the start of the season when they both were on the top lines, with Kassian being more of the goal scorer (understandably playing with the Sedins).
Sure math isn't always correct, but it's a good guideline to follow, and it's a lot more telling than your hur hur hur hodgson scored more lololol. It shows that Kassian absolutely has potential and upside to be a top quality offensive player, his only problem is inconsistency, which we all knew was going to be an issue going into it.