And a couple of people who also aren't journalists do feel like you're going out on a limb based on the information we have right now. It's not that big of a deal.
I don't have a problem with disagreeing that it's more likely that he did it. Saying "according to who, your ass?" is immature and pointless.
And just because we don't have tons of information on this accusation itself doesn't mean we don't have tons of information on the accused person, and the rape culture of guys like him in general. I think most people just hear about the cabby and partying stuff with Kane, but it goes way deeper than that. We're talking about a guy who uses his friends as sex bouncers as his parties, confiscating people's phones and shit to allow them to enter. Honestly, the story didn't even really surprise me that much when it first broke. I mean, shit, this isn't even the first time he's been accused of aggression towards women.
Then again, maybe she's lying and all the stuff I'm saying here just made him an easier target. Who knows. All I said is that I don't feel good about the chances of his innocence.