My game crashed at exactly the same point...I had the greatest possible timing for a crash
This is on Ending E
I thought it was intentional at first
![]()
Yea, even after knowing the truth, 9S still was obsessed with humanity.
What?Is the AI leading the Machines (The one based on OG Nier) ever given a name? I know N2 is the dolls but I don't think he's ever labelled.
You guys want to really feel like you missed half the story?
https://tanoshimi.xyz/2017/03/21/violet-evergarden-spoilers/
Enjoy. This got linked on Reddit earlier, and it's a fantastic article examining the game's plot and characters.
The Aliens came from space, but they built the machines on Earth. The very first conflict was basically Emil Vs the aliens. The machines came either during or after that war.
The lead machine AI is taken from the original subject of Project Gestalt, who turned out of be classic Nier.
Where are you getting this from? Cause I don't remember anything like that.The lead machine AI is taken from the original subject of Project Gestalt, who turned out of be classic Nier.
Yes, this is in the final note from her analysis work or whatever after finishing E.Jackass' note talks about them gaining sentience after discovering the original Nier's data. That's where they discovered the human mind, and thus, created the thing that speaks to you in the tower
Man, that's nuts. You really miss a lot of subtext if you don't pay attention to other media. I completely missed the first time around how P-33 from nier is heavily implied to be the cause of the machines becoming self aware. There is a small picture book about it when you enter the apartment complex as 9S but I didn't really understand the context at the time.
Oh, yeah, rereading it I see why I forgot.
It's not that the ai was based on Nier, but the ai already existed, and used the gestalt project stuff to form its understanding of humans.
The way you phrased that made it sound like the aliens based the ai on Nier. Which wouldn't surprise me since they based the machines bodies on Emil.
Nier fucks everything up again! From beyond the grave this time! Or arguably from outside of reality depending?
any pic of that? i think i missed it
Still trying to put some of this together. let me know if this sounds right:
Aliens invaded earth while humanity was already on the ropes due to the illnesses or whatever from Nier. Mankind's best defense was Emil (who was an advanced combat robot?). Emil created copies of himself to form a larger front line of Emils to help fight against the aliens and war ensues for thousands of years (?). Aliens at some point turned to using machines to do their fighting for them and they based the design on Emil (hence most of the robot enemies having sphere heads). They implanted cores in them which gave them a measure of independence and ability to learn and adapt (?)
Basically. Only things you're missing is OG Nier stuff (which is still explained in Automata through intel).Still trying to put some of this together. let me know if this sounds right:
Aliens invaded earth while humanity was already on the ropes due to the illnesses or whatever from Nier. Mankind's best defense was Emil (who was an advanced combat robot?). Emil created copies of himself to form a larger front line of Emils to help fight against the aliens and war ensues for thousands of years (?). Aliens at some point turned to using machines to do their fighting for them and they based the design on Emil. They implanted cores in them which gave them a measure of independence and ability to learn and adapt (?)
Later on the machine network the aliens created evolved and killed their creators. In the process of the machines learning about the world around them, they encountered the databases on humans including project gestalt and other stuff, which informed their evolutionary process. This resulted in the creation of the conceptual red girls, H2. They intended to destroy the remains of humanity on the moon but decided against doing so because....I can't remember.
Is this sort of right? Please correct.
Also, what exactly was on the moon? Just gene data? "Replicants"? I'm not clear what those are?
Halp.
That's how I understand it, except humanity of all types were long gone by the time aliens even arrived. All that was left is Emil and the androids. He fought his war out of respect for the friends he lost saving it once upon a time. All that is left of humanity is some genome data stored on the moon.
Basically. Only things you're missing is OG Nier stuff (which is still explained in Automata through intel).
-Humans were extinct like a thousand years before aliens invaded. Emil was created as a weapon to fight something else called "The Legion" who are long gone before the first Nier even starts but due to being Emil he still existed and fought the aliens by himself.
-Stuff on the moon is probably replicant data, so it's data to create a weird clone body of a human that isn't supposed to be sentient but is.
-The machines don't blow up the server because they realise it'll just continue the loop, and they feel ready to break away from it.
You guys want to really feel like you missed half the story?
https://tanoshimi.xyz/2017/03/21/violet-evergarden-spoilers/
Enjoy. This got linked on Reddit earlier, and it's a fantastic article examining the game's plot and characters.
got it. thanks all, really. lots of moving parts here. would have actually been nice to have background from Nier presented to the player through some short videos along the way so that some of these holes can be fleshed out for those experiencing the series for the first time.
random questions:
- are the androids also replicants? if not, what's the difference between an android and a replicant? are replicants organic clones?
No, replicants were simply souless sterile organic clones who could live their lives without actually being sentient, sort of like autopilot until they started to develop said sentience and the whole plan started to go wrong. Their purpose was to last long enough to merge back with their Gestalts once WCS had disappeared from the world.
- what exactly are machine cores? was there a deeper significance between the fact that their cores are similar in design to black boxes significant? Was one actually derived from the other?
Machine cores are basically the brain/soul/AI/sentience of a machine lifeform. The unknown creators of YoRHa derived the cores of the new androids from these machine cores as they believed that unlike their own sentience, machine sentience is fake, simulated etc and it would not be a moral or ethical problem to use them in sacrificial lambs they planned the YoRHa army to be
- who created the androids if humanity had been dead for centuries? who created the new YoRHa models for the "cycle"?
No one knows. I wonder this myself as someone somewhere must have a decently equipped facility and a lot of resources to make all this happen, yet stay hidden. -edit This refers to YoRHa, Androids themselves were created by humans
-Yep. Replicants are organic clones. They have some similarities to androids in that they were non-sentient beings that eventually gained sentience, but they aren't mechanical and will age and die naturally.got it. thanks all, really. lots of moving parts here. would have actually been nice to have background from Nier presented to the player through some short videos along the way so that some of these holes can be fleshed out for those experiencing the series for the first time.
random questions:
- are the androids also replicants? if not, what's the difference between an android and a replicant? are replicants organic clones?
- what exactly are machine cores? was there a deeper significance between the fact that their cores are similar in design to black boxes significant? Was one actually derived from the other?
- who created the androids if humanity had been dead for centuries? who created the new YoRHa models for the "cycle"?
Mankind's best defense was Emil (who was an advanced combat robot?). Emil created copies of himself to form a larger front line of Emils to help fight against the aliens and war ensues for thousands of years (?)
My sweet boy Emil wasn't a robot. He was a human kid from the 21st century who was experimented on along with his sister, to create powerful magical human weapons. Some fucked up stuff happens and eventually he becomes the countless Heads you see in Automata. He's the oldest living thing in the NieR world and his life has sucked for almost 10k years.
Who the heck run this government?
random questions:
- are the androids also replicants? if not, what's the difference between an android and a replicant? are replicants organic clones?
- what exactly are machine cores? was there a deeper significance between the fact that their cores are similar in design to black boxes significant? Was one actually derived from the other?
- who created the androids if humanity had been dead for centuries? who created the new YoRHa models for the "cycle"?
I like how this entire order makes sense with how adam found the aliens boring and 1 note. Of course thats the best instructions those lame aliens could come up withLike the Androids though, the machine's original purpose to destroy their enemy has remained a constant over the centuries.
Thanks for the responses!
Sorry, another question: I see in reading various wiki entries that the last of the Gestalts died some 800 years after the events of the original Nier. Is there any idea of the lifespan of Gestalts? How did any hold on so long after thewas defeated if he was the only thing keeping them all from falling into Relapse? For what was supposed to be a temporary displacement, they sure seemed to last a long fucking time. Is that because they were "asleep" like some sort of stasis? Based on the Wikis, I had assumed they all began to fall into Relapse immediately after his death, but maybe not? I'm trying to get a better understanding of this world. It's really hard for me to follow.Shadowlord
I assume that Replicants have a normal human lifespan? Also, is it fair to simply call Replicants humans, especially given their sentience? Or is that an underlying theme of the game itself (what is it to be human)? I guess I'm in part looking to confirm that the end of humanity was defined by the death of the final Replicant, rather than the final normal human.
edit: clarifying questions further.![]()
I let the game sink in a while since yesterday, and I came to a conclusion : I was a little disappointed by the game because I was expecting some more NieR and not something new.
I mean, as a stand-alone title, the game is stellar, but I kept playing it expecting some grandiose revelations about NieR. I think YT deliberately put a lot of things in the game as if mocking the kind of player I was.
I mean :
- Oh hey it's Emil ! A soon as you meet him he flees at sonic speed. Next time you see him, he's just a merchant. Oh you want to see more of him ? Too bad he's not even the original Emil, and he's miserable, and you have to upgrade ALL of the weapons before seeing anything of significance.
- Oh hey it's Devola and Popola ! Except they're nothing like NieR, and live through hell. Hope you're glad to see them again.
- what there's a council of humanity ? That means that maybe the Gestalt project or something else came through !! Can't wait to see how they did it after NieR !- Well here's a medical report about Yonah if you want...where there's litteraly nothing of importance.HA HA FUCK YOU
So, well, if I could give one piece of warning to people who loved NieR and want to play NieR Automata : it's not a sequel. It's its own game which happens to share some things with its prequel. NieR Automata is to NieR what NieR was to Drakengard and not what Drakengard 2 was to Drakengard.
To add to this, I'd like to know what it means exactly for a Gestalt to "relapse."
There is a thing I found fascinating after watching some people reactions on youtube when Pascal takes over.
Most people seem to be going like "omg epic let's fuck shit up Pascal!" and the game obviously is using that, but I experienced it like a gut wrenching moment and at first just stood there in the Engels not doing anything. I hate when characters are forced to throw their core beliefs out of the window and for Pascal that was absolutely terrible if you think about the character and its story.
What follows is even worse, lol.
In any case, I feel like not many games did that before. Hiding your most tragic moments under a sugar coating video-game-epic moment is pretty interesting and people have different reactions to that. Still, it is kinda fucked up when you think about it.
I let the game sink in a while since yesterday, and I came to a conclusion : I was a little disappointed by the game because I was expecting some more NieR and not something new.
I mean, as a stand-alone title, the game is stellar, but I kept playing it expecting some grandiose revelations about NieR. I think YT deliberately put a lot of things in the game as if mocking the kind of player I was.
I mean :
- Oh hey it's Emil ! A soon as you meet him he flees at sonic speed. Next time you see him, he's just a merchant. Oh you want to see more of him ? Too bad he's not even the original Emil, and he's miserable, and you have to upgrade ALL of the weapons before seeing anything of significance.
- Oh hey it's Devola and Popola ! Except they're nothing like NieR, and live through hell. Hope you're glad to see them again.
- what there's a council of humanity ? That means that maybe the Gestalt project or something else came through !! Can't wait to see how they did it after NieR !- Well here's a medical report about Yonah if you want...where there's litteraly nothing of importance.HA HA FUCK YOU
So, well, if I could give one piece of warning to people who loved NieR and want to play NieR Automata : it's not a sequel. It's its own game which happens to share some things with its prequel. NieR Automata is to NieR what NieR was to Drakengard and not what Drakengard 2 was to Drakengard.
I'm more surprised at the amount of callbacks to the Cult of the Watchers from Drakengard 1, from red eyes to little girls becoming huge and having deep voices, to the Copied City and the Tower being made of a material similar to the Giant, and Eve having their symbol on his chest.
Thanks for the responses!
Sorry, another question: I see in reading various wiki entries that the last of the Gestalts died some 800 years after the events of the original Nier. Is there any idea of the lifespan of Gestalts? How did any hold on so long after thewas defeated if he was the only thing keeping them all from falling into Relapse? For what was supposed to be a temporary displacement, they sure seemed to last a long fucking time. Is that because they were "asleep" like some sort of stasis? Based on the Wikis, I had assumed they all began to fall into Relapse immediately after his death, but maybe not? I'm trying to get a better understanding of this world. It's really hard for me to follow.Shadowlord
I assume that Replicants have a normal human lifespan? Also, is it fair to simply call Replicants humans, especially given their sentience? Or is that an underlying theme of the game itself (what is it to be human)? I guess I'm in part looking to confirm that the end of humanity was defined by the death of the final Replicant, rather than the final normal human.
edit: clarifying questions further.![]()
I just enjoy that Taro's like:
"Hey! It's everybody's favorite skelebro Emil! You had so many fun journeys with him, remember!
...
Yeah, it's not the same one, it's just one of his copies desperately trying to retain memories of the original body"
"Hey! It's everybody's favorite twins, Devola and Popola! Remember all the fun times you had (before killing them)?!
...
They're not the same ones, but due to humanity being assholes they are made to feel guilty for the original's sins and wander the earth constantly trying to make up for something that wasn't their fault until they die."
Probably a dumb question but: if humanity is inexistant, why are the androids fighting to reclaim earth?
Thanks for the responses!
Sorry, another question: I see in reading various wiki entries that the last of the Gestalts died some 800 years after the events of the original Nier. Is there any idea of the lifespan of Gestalts? How did any hold on so long after thewas defeated if he was the only thing keeping them all from falling into Relapse? For what was supposed to be a temporary displacement, they sure seemed to last a long fucking time. Is that because they were "asleep" like some sort of stasis? Based on the Wikis, I had assumed they all began to fall into Relapse immediately after his death, but maybe not? I'm trying to get a better understanding of this world. It's really hard for me to follow.Shadowlord
I assume that Replicants have a normal human lifespan? Also, is it fair to simply call Replicants humans, especially given their sentience? Or is that an underlying theme of the game itself (what is it to be human)? I guess I'm in part looking to confirm that the end of humanity was defined by the death of the final Replicant, rather than the final normal human.
edit: clarifying questions further.![]()