Some are saying it's "impossible" for Nintendo to have a console as powerful as PS/Xbox because "they are Nintendo", but Nintendo has always had the most or almost the most powerful consoles of the market before the Wii so that doesn't make sense. Nintendo does Nintendo and that is "whatever the hell they want without following patterns"
Yea thats like over 20 years ago lol.
![L*][*N*K](/data/avatars/m/842/842515.jpg?1750247637){kind=avatar}
got your proper reveal right here
13 and technology is in Nintendo favor.
What you mean 13? gamecube released in 2001 that was the last time they released hardware that can compete. As for switch being close to xbox not sure i owned a ps4 and graphically/performance ps4 games like nextgen compared to switch. As for switch 3 catching up not gonna happen This gen switch might get lucky cause dsll and current can't run RT at acceptable levels but once AMD masters Their version which is looking good with fsr3 you are gonna need powerful hardware to get 60fps/Nextgen ray tracing.
6. Nintendo is using latest nvidia tech, which if far superior of AMD's and any other competitor in graphics and AI hardware
I mean, 13 years since the Wii but yeah, you're right counting from GC launch.
Take it with a grain of salt, ofc, but the claims could very well be true as both Tom Phillips (author of this Eurogamer article) and Andy Robinson from VGC are reputable journos. They wouldn't put out these reports if the info they got through their sources was not credible.
Both of those thoughts can exist at the same time you know and not contradict each other.
It'll be a neck-snapping twist going from "graphics don't matter" to "I HAVE THE POWWWAH!" back to "whatever, graphics don't matter". This thing can't come out soon enough.
Not saying so, but that because of tech advances and graphics diminishing returns, Nintendo can make something that plays most or all current gen games with some graphical adjustments, just like the Switch with last gen games but with less compromises, then next gen Nintendo console will close the gap even more.
Lol you said you think mobile will reach home consoles raw power and i'm just saying that ain't happening. As for switch 2 yea i think it can get most ports unless FS3 is amazing and most developers start using that and Adding top of the line RT in 2 or 3 years, then it will have problems. also depends how successful it is.
Right now NVDA has huge advantage vs AMD with DSLL but AMD is suppose to have a answer with FS3, if FS3 is close then the advantage is gone.
I'm not in the slightest, uh... ...assblasted by the suggestion that Nintendo would want to get into the arms race with Sony and Microsoft, but given the massive success of the Switch, it would seem a bit weird to move to hardware that is less profitable for no real reason.
I'm in the eGPU bandwagon. Nintendo do can easily make a dock with an upscale built in that forces 1440p /60 out to tv making games look incredible especially with Nintendo's art styles. Add a dedicated NIC also just that Nintendo do take would be 150 overpriced
OR
Yes and every other day we get a thread or a post on how series s is holding back games or how much devs hate the series s lol
So youve played it? Cool, thanks for the insider info, I feel much more certain now
Its Nintendo, you know they wont.
Sure there's a lot of mobile chips that can easily best the ps4. The question will be can nintendo take this chip and make a well rounded system that's also not a monstrosity like the steamdeck with decent battery life for a decent price.
I mean we already have PS4 era games running on Switch
For Nintendo there are different rules
they make the rules !
Chances are that the Series S is more powerful than the Switch 2.
Yet it runs then without a single issue beyond those that bigger consoles already have. In any case, you still have to deal with PS5 and XSX, Switch 2 won't have any issue most probably.
yea almost 100% DSLL exists now, and it's your typical fp16 hyperbowl.
