orthodoxy1095
Banned
This is about as disingenuous as you can get.Me saying something in reply to someone else on Twitter also shouldn't spur into a conversation on GAF.
This is about as disingenuous as you can get.Me saying something in reply to someone else on Twitter also shouldn't spur into a conversation on GAF.
"Exciting and interesting" info, which we didn't get. Unless you get excited over warmed-up leftovers.
No ones gonna take the wind out of the Jan12th sails man
Leakers themselves are hesitant to spoil everything
Gawd Damnit!
Who said it wont be the case? Was it LKD? If so, ever info comes from Europe and sometimes NA, if MH is coming in Japan first she prob would not even know.
Yes lets shit on the few insiders we have cuz we didnt get enough dessert at the dinner table
In fact, he was talking about Metroid existing being a foregone conclusion, and the question was simply when Nintendo would unveil it, so it definitely wasn't a normal conversation (combine that with the fact that he was talking to Liam Robertson, who also goes through life as an insider).
Still, the outrage over the GI magazine is kinda ridiculous. NateDrake: "Hey guys, I heard there will be an article about Zelda in the GI magazine that will be revealed this week, should be interesting!" Some GAFfers: "Hey, you said we would be getting new info, yet the article only mentions existing info. LOL fake!"
It seems like he was just trying to tell us that the GI magazine had an article about Zelda that might contain new info (which he didn't know), and now people are complaining about him. He never claimed to know what was inside the article, and taking "should be an interesting week" as evidence that he was teasing new info is stretching it a little far imo.
Yeah major disappointment if so.
Yeah but it's concerning that she gave an indication either way.
Yeah major disappointment if so.
Yeah but it's concerning that she gave an indication either way.
Whats her track record on reporting JP dev info?
I think that while a leaker may have their info validated ("zelda article on GI"), you should always be careful on how you extrapolate that, i think liam got some things wrong not because he got wrong info, but because he extrapolated on that, and i think that nate did that too. You have to be very careful on how you pass your info. If he said "It seems like there will be an article about zelda on GI this week, don't know if it's new or not", i guarantee that there would be no backlash against him.
She also said Zelda will come out in June and had to back peddle on that, so she isnt always right, just like all insiders.
I just cant see Nintendo revealing a new system in Japan and not showing off Japaneses heavy hitters.
If the event was in NA, I would not expect it
Do we think she has the majority of the Jan 12th announcements pegged by now?
Seems to just getting the western info for the most part which makes sense since thats what her sources are
Whats her track record on reporting JP dev info?
Depends if any Japanese heavy hitters are actually coming, outside of the DQXI port.
Well she's reported on Dark Souls.
I'd hope no one has most of the announcements pegged otherwise there's very little being shown.
yaaaaay
....too bad I live in Brazil =P
But I do have a friend in toronto so lucky him I guess
Yes lets shit on the few insiders we have cuz we didnt get enough dessert at the dinner table
The Vita's resurrection is almost upon us. Are you all ready?
People getting too thirsty lol. Damn shame...This is about as disingenuous as you can get.
Because it's new handheld gaming hardware that isn't dogshit. What else would it be?why do people call the switch the new vita ?
why do people call the switch the new vita ?
Im gonna ride the Hope bus on this one
The Vita's resurrection is almost upon us. Are you all ready?
why do people call the switch the new vita ?
i bet next week will disappoint
Can I still complain and call Doom on Nintendo?Only if you know all the leaks
Can I still complain and call Doom on Nintendo?
I see no reason that Japanese third parties wouldn't move over to Switch, and the same goes for indies. I think Vita devs should have a fine new home on Switch.Well I definitely hope you're right!
Will it get all the games though? That's the lingering question.
It's a powerful, one screen handheld that seemingly concentrates on console games on the go. In that respect it's probably more similar to Vita than 3DS.
i bet next week will disappoint
Let's hope it will have more interesting games then.Because its the new Vita
But that guy on here the other day said a Doom port was coming...The chances of Doom on the Switch aren't that high.
I see no reason that Japanese third parties wouldn't move over to Switch, and the same goes for indies. I think Vita devs should have a fine new home on Switch.
Because its the new Vita
Yeah, not a fan of the comparison to the Vita to be honest. I get that it's because of the hardware (and I guess potential for Vita games to be ported over), but man, whenever I want to feel hopelessly depressed I just think about the Vita library and presto! I want to curl up and die.Let's hope it will have more interesting games then.
Let's hope it will have more interesting games then.
Slightly overhyping something cool... We need his head on a platter!
...As if Gaf wasn't getting excited about every little thing anyway. He just thought a preview was gonna be more exciting than it ended up being. That's not a stain on his track record. Eurogamer, Emily and Laura don't know every detail about what they're reporting either. NateDrake just posted a tweet. It's not like he made a thread on Gaf with a title in all-caps. Some of you are getting a little crazy. Stop hitting refresh. Take a deep breath. Go outside for a bit.
So's your face.Let's hope it will have more interesting games then.
The same would be applied to 3DS, it had way more sales than Vita to attract 3rd parties yet those same devs choose Vita.I see no reason that Japanese third parties wouldn't move over to Switch, and the same goes for indies. I think Vita devs should have a fine new home on Switch.
Sadly there's one big reason:
The same would be applied to 3DS, it had way more sales than Vita to attract 3rd parties yet those same devs choose Vita.
The same would be applied to 3DS, it had way more sales than Vita to attract 3rd parties yet those same devs choose Vita.
Folks, Rob means the Vita comparison positively
For a second I felt really dumb for forgetting Seven Stars. Thanks.
Because their games couldn't run on 3DS. It won't be the case for the Switch.
It could be because of the hardware just like how Vita developers are moving to PS4.
Sadly there's one big reason:
Not the same situation. 3DS hardware wasn't there. Switch hardware is.The same would be applied to 3DS, it had way more sales than Vita to attract 3rd parties yet those same devs choose Vita.
Huh?
EDIT:
People argued the same thing for PSP devs to move to 3DS five years ago to be fair.