What's with the image in the OP that keeps evolving?! Magical.
I'm sorry I just had to post this cause nobody seemed to notice it.
I just don't believe all the games need to be out on day 1 for a purchase on day 1 to make sense. Most of us will have our hands full with Zelda and probably something else, lets say snipperclips for quite some time. Then next month potentially get MK8 (many people never got a chance to play it) and it carries on like that, I think it makes sense. Lets say there were 20 huge nintendo exclusives ready to launch this week, who has time to play them all?
I manage to get a LOT of game time in during the week even, and I know I'll have my hands full with Zelda.
What other justification is there for putting on a score for something that's going to change noticeably in a day or two?
Like the New Wii and the New Wii U?
Oh wait they never existed. People shouldnt expect a new Switch iteration anytime soon or even happening.
Next year or beyond the value proposition may hit a sweet spot for me after Mario is out, the next mainline Fire Emblem, Animal Crossing, maybe a new Metroid Prime, whatever Retro's new IP is if it's up my alley, maybe Smash and Mario Maker ports/updated versions, some decent third party Japanese games that appeal to me etc. And at that point their may be price drops, and if not bundles and retailer-specific offers that save me some cash.
There is still some unanswered questions regarding the hardware including the joycon fix if it can be a software fix or if it's a hardware fix. The lack of features in the OS at launch.I totally understand his concerns about its future. But regarding the actual hardware, it's hard to take him too seriously when it gets so many praises out there.
I would assume because PS4 is a boring visionless piece of technology that upon launch missed a number of features that the PS3 did have. Console hardware reviews always play out like this: it feels nice but unless you feel like you need it, it's better to wait and see. Seems like Switch already scores better than PS4 at launch, that's kind of hopeful, at the same time, yeah it's a launch, it's a gamble, so review sites are understandably standoffish. Cautious people buy later.WTF? How is that even possible?
Agreed, well put.We're on the same page on that. Value proposition just depends on peoples level of interest in they console (do they like the hybrid features, or are they only console gamers and find it underpowered and over priced etc.), game interest, disposable in come etc.
This fall will be the real test for Switch IMO. How do those Switch bundles sell compared to $200-250 PS4 Slim and X1 bundles. The PS4 UC4 bundle is regular $250 already and was down as low as $220 something last week. How does the Scorpio launch effect the market?
It will be an interesting sales season for sure.
Yep, great example of how value proposition varies by individual. Makes tons of sense for you to buy day one. Little sense for someone like me who doesn't care about the portability at all, doesn't at all care about having new gadgets early and prefers to wait and save money, and who isn't getting rid of my Wii U anytime soon (stays around for Wii Fit if nothing else).
Don't tease my fragile heart about a new Metroid Prime. It's easier on my soul to just never mention the possibility
I just don't believe all the games need to be out on day 1 for a purchase on day 1 to make sense. Most of us will have our hands full with Zelda and probably something else, lets say snipperclips for quite some time. Then next month potentially get MK8 (many people never got a chance to play it) and it carries on like that, I think it makes sense. Lets say there were 20 huge nintendo exclusives ready to launch this week, who has time to play them all?
I manage to get a LOT of game time in during the week even, and I know I'll have my hands full with Zelda.
Not that I saw, Those were the main two included from any of the videos of people recieving the switch but it is possible others were inlcuded.So did nintendo send out any games for review purposes that were not zelda or 1 - 2 switch?
I would assume because PS4 is a boring visionless piece of technology that upon launch missed a number of features that the PS3 did have. Console hardware reviews always play out like this: it feels nice but unless you feel like you need it, it's better to wait and see. Seems like Switch already scores better than PS4 at launch, that's kind of hopeful, at the same time, yeah it's a launch. Smart people buy later.
Actually, is it confirmed that there is a launch day firmware update, or is that an assumption? I'm just genuinely curious. In fairness you'd expect it these days, but I just don't remember it being stated.
I dont know what reviews you are reading but i wouldn't say "very positive". We are looking at a hardware coming in very hot with a lot of features including some basic ones missing with a lackluster launch lineup with zelda being a huge standout. All the reviews lean towards wait and see unless you really want to play zelda... . Yes, i can see a lot of them seem to like the hardware and concept and i am confident there will be excellent nintendo games to justify the system down the line. I am getting one at launch to try out zelda mostly because i was able to get a good deal for trading ps4 since i got a pro. Lets see if i like zelda or if i will return it.Why are you focusing on IGN's review when the vast majority is very positive
So did nintendo send out any games for review purposes that were not zelda or 1 - 2 switch?
Like the New Wii and the New Wii U?
Oh wait they never existed. People shouldnt expect a new Switch iteration anytime soon or even happening.
And still it scored higher than PS4 on the GuardianThe difference here is that Switch is launching without basic things.
Not some far fetched ideas that have never been attempted before.
No VC. No Online. No streaming apps. No achievements system. Horrendous 3rd party support.
Bundle those deficiencies with glaring issues with the hardware and you see why most reviewers have a wait and see mentality.
It will be a new firmware version as it includes new features as well as unlocking those that don't work as default (internet based features, which as soon as you connect it asks you to get the update).
It'l be 1.1 or 1.01 if the initial version is v1.
And still it scored higher than PS4 on the Guardian
Amazing.
Oh and it does have online, don't make stuff up.
The difference here is that Switch is launching without basic things.
Not some far fetched ideas that have never been attempted before.
No VC. No Online. No streaming apps. No achievements system. No controller audio out. Horrendous 3rd party support.
Bundle those deficiencies with glaring issues with the hardware and you see why most reviewers have a wait and see mentality.
It's very much at odds with their coverage so far, in an almost bewildering way.IGN sounds overly pressed. It's fine if they disliked it, but they seem a bit too mean in their review
The fuck?
How is this possible/
Wouldn't it be charging in the dock?
Isn't that every console?Reviews are what I expected. Nintendo hardware at launch is nothing but a $300 plastic container for games that don't exist yet.
Most reviewers had a "wait and see" mentality for PS4 and Xbox One as well. It's fair to criticize Switch's shortcomings, but lets not pretend that outlets were screaming "BUY BUY BUY" for the other two from day one.
It's very much at odds with their coverage so far, in an almost bewildering way.
Oh, that would make sense then. Though I've seen Jose with the thing most of the time, so I just assumed he'd be the one doing the review of the system and Zelda.Because the person who wrote the review probably has different opinions from the people making Switch videos on their website. From how I understand it the guy who reviewed the console isn't even part of the IGN Nintendo team.
These reviews aren't very flattering. Most seem to say "uh... let's just wait on this and see how it plays out." Hmm I think I'm just going to get Horizon instead.
That's not what I am saying.
Wait and see for any launch is fine.
This thing is launching without basic functionality. Things that have existed in some cases for 2 console generations.
Most reviewers had a "wait and see" mentality for PS4 and Xbox One as well. It's fair to criticize Switch's shortcomings, but lets not pretend that outlets were screaming "BUY BUY BUY" for the other two from day one.
Does it? I thought the online was coming in the summer.And still it scored higher than PS4 on the Guardian
Amazing.
Oh and it does have online, don't make stuff up.
Because the person who wrote the review probably has different opinions from the people making Switch videos on their website. From how I understand it the guy who reviewed the console isn't even part of the IGN Nintendo team.
Does it? I thought the online was coming in the summer.
Given how much hardware and interfaces change over a console's lifespan, the reviews don't really say anything I didn't already know or expected, but it's nice that a lot of people like the hardware and think that it's a solid foundation for their future despite what for some people are shortcomings.
It's very much at odds with their coverage so far, in an almost bewildering way.
Isn't that every console?
Can't they have the port on the top side? It's not like the docking position of the switch matters.
Well you can't spell ignorant without IGN, we know this. I don't know what IGN's review in progress has to do with my answering someone who asked why Switch scored higher than PS4 at the Guardian though. Maybe you feel very strongly about PS4 that you feel the need to defend it.And currently it's sitting at a 6.7 on IGN.
Truly amazing.
No I don't. No party chat?You know what I mean by no online.
And still it scored higher than PS4 on the Guardian
Amazing.
Oh and it does have online, don't make stuff up.
The difference here is that Switch is launching without basic things.
Not some far fetched ideas that have never been attempted before.
No VC. No Online. No streaming apps. No achievements system. No controller audio out. Horrendous 3rd party support.
Bundle those deficiencies with glaring issues with the hardware and you see why most reviewers have a wait and see mentality.