Liferebooted
Banned
Love my Wii U and 3ds but Nintendo is fucking high if they believe this.
It's factually false. Third party games are thing.
Love my Wii U and 3ds but Nintendo is fucking high if they believe this.
It's true as well.
Is anything factually false on it, as far as info goes? I don't go to metacritic and hate reviews in general, so I wouldn't know.
Truth is not subjective.
The number of "great" games on Nintendo platforms is, however.
Using user score as a determining factor seems kind of weird.
True. Saying Nintendo needs 3rd party is pathetic.
They can dominate every sales chart without that.
Truth. Only 3DS is legit, BUT, New 3DS is around the corner, so the original is also a pretty bad christmas present.
System: # of games with over 90% Metacritic /# of games with over 85% Metacritic
PS4: 6/23
3DS: 7/20
WiiU: 6/21
Vita: 3/21
XBO: 2/14
No. The criteria they used is a little silly but what they are saying is true. Every company makes claims that they have the best games and Nintendo just used some data to back their specific claim up.
Regardless, the idea the the WiiU currently has the best line up of games is fairly common here on GAF. It's strange seeing this singular ad get so many people rilled up.
Well the impressive thing about it is that they only count games with a critical AND user score above 85.
No it's more an indictment of Nintendo.
Well, I'm never fucking buying Nintendo as a primary console as long as they only have games from a single publisher.
WiiU ???True. Saying Nintendo needs 3rd party is pathetic.
They can dominate every sales chart without that.
This thread took a scary turn.
No. The criteria they used is a little silly but what they are saying is true. Every company makes claims that they have the best games and Nintendo just used some data to back their specific claim up.
Regardless, the idea the the WiiU currently has the best line up of games is fairly common here on GAF. It's strange seeing this singular ad get so many people rilled up.
They quantify what "great" games are right there in the ad.
That is not actually impressive, it is intentionally misleading. User scores on Metacritic are demonstrably bullshit. They are frequently thrown off by people trying to intentionally reduce scores. All this shows is that Nintendo games don't typically get as many attempts to ruin score averages by anonymous voters. Its silly to tie a statement of game quality to such a completely illegitimate measure.
PC: 107/387
I was curious.
Honestly surprised it isn't higher
The sad thing is that is all over an ad of all things. I mean, what's the worst that could happen? A family buys a Wii U for Christmas? Oh the humanity!
I think it's because Nintendo normally do not engage in list war marketing and them doing it now seems rather odd. I may be wrong though since I hardly ever notice marketing from Nintendo.Seriously. "Nintendo thinks they have some really good games? What assholes!"
Ahahahahha.If you really think like that than I am really sad for you because you miss alot of awesome games in your liveAnd if you don't like Mario games than you are not a real gamer in my opinion, everyone loves Mario
Edit: And when you have Kids one day than you will be happy that Mario excists![]()
Using user score is what discredits their claim. User score is utterly meaningless on Metacritic and should never be taken seriously. I know they wanted to heavily skew the information in their chart, but it just looks tacky because of this. They probably would still have the most retail games with 85+ on Metacritic, so including user score is just unnecessary.
Bayonetta 2 and Xenoblade are published by Nintendo but otherwise developed by third party devs.That's great Nintendo, so what happens once I'm done with all 18 of those great games? That's right, I jump ship to other consoles that third parties actually support. You might have the most exclusives on your console, but what you don't have is anything else that would make me pick up a controller and play it. I don't mean to sound harsh, I love Nintendo, but they keep on goofin'.
Consumers are just as biased if not more so.They probably wanted to strip out the games vastly overrated in the press.
Edit: Fucking Halo MCC has a Metacritic of 85 and a user rating far lower and it's unplayable so yeah, Nintendo's spin machine sure is up to no good.
Bayonetta 2 was published by Nintendo but otherwise developed by third party devs.
Bayonetta 2 and Xenoblade are published by Nintendo but otherwise developed by third party devs.
Consumers are just as biased if not more so.
That's the only game I can think of where an instruction manual on how to hold the controller would have helped a lot of people immensely, including reviewers.Kid Icarus isn't on the 3DS side
Fuck this flyer
Kid Icarus isn't on the 3DS side
Fuck this flyer
The people complaining in this thread?This isn't a poll to decide the future of the universe, it's Nintendo bragging about some games. Any consumers who see it will apply this bias and draw their own conclusions.
I have no idea why people are getting bent out of shape about this. Nintendo's in the business of selling video games. It's Friday night and it's almost Christmas. Who cares?
Yeah no.
A single publisher does not outdo the rest of the industry.
In your opinion? Sure."rest of the industry" you mean the likes of EA, Activision, Ubisoft, Konami and Capcom?? Yeah they kinda do..
"rest of the industry" you mean the likes of EA, Activision, Ubisoft, Konami and Capcom?? Yeah they kinda do..
True. Saying Nintendo needs 3rd party is pathetic.
They can dominate every sales chart without that.
"rest of the industry" you mean the likes of EA, Activision, Ubisoft, Konami and Capcom?? Yeah they kinda do..
The ad has games from four publishers.Yeah no.
A single publisher does not outdo the rest of the industry.