ymoc
Member
reactors are pretty cool
i want one.
Where is that, Slovenia?
reactors are pretty cool
i want one.
What this tells me is that clearly Solar/Wind /Hydro is the way to go. Negligible differences compared to Nuclear WITHOUT the insanely long-term risk that Nuclear poses to ourselves and our environment. Not to mention that the STAIN Chernobyl has put on the earth's face around the accident zone is not expressable with a human death / tw ratio. Same goes for Fukushima.
does that make nuclear disaster acceptable?
So far the best storage technology seeme to be combining solar or wind with water energy. Basically you use energy from wind and solar to pump water upstream, and then using turbines to generate electricity as needed. Needles to say this is a pretty expensive solution.
What this tells me is that clearly Solar/Wind /Hydro is the way to go. Negligible differences compared to Nuclear WITHOUT the insanely long-term risk that Nuclear poses to ourselves and our environment. Not to mention that the STAIN Chernobyl has put on the earth's face around the accident zone is not expressable with a human death / tw ratio. Same goes for Fukushima.
Do you mean a production of 146 TW or are you comparing the yearly production to the storage capacity? I mean, you usually don't store energy for a year or so.By 2020 the share of renewable energy production in Germany is predicted to be 146 TWh, currently storage is enough for 0,04 TWh. The only viable solution is power to gas (storage capacity >200TWh) but that has an efficiency of ~20%... so much wastage but the producers will of course get paid for all of it (guaranteed renumeration for 20 years).
Do you mean a production of 146 TW or are you comparing the yearly production to the storage capacity? I mean, you usually don't store energy for a year or so.
ЯAW;85288189 said:Agreed, except for Hydro. I'm assuming by hydro we mainly mean dams, and dams can have unwanted problems for the environment. Problems can be avoided with proper studies but I am pessimistic about China and India conducting proper studies when they build their dams.
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/339/6115/36.summary
Hydro needs to go!
It kills everything that lives in the river, its not green energy.
Here here. This is especially relevant to Japan with all its natural hot springs all over the place. Just ready for the tapping. This is the direction Japan shouldve went.Geothermal for lyfe.
Here here. This is especially relevant to Japan with all its natural hot springs all over the place. Just ready for the tapping. This is the direction Japan shouldve went.
This is more important IMO:Here here. This is especially relevant to Japan with all its natural hot springs all over the place. Just ready for the tapping. This is the direction Japan shouldve went.
Fukushima worker accidentally switches off cooling pumps; backup kicks in
Source
You know, if it weren't so serious, this would be pretty funny.
With Geo thermal you can enjoy both without losing snow monkies.This is more important IMO:
Yeah it's pretty bad. Life imitating art at its worst. This is what you get when you sub contract your staff 2 to 3 shell companies down the line. We've got mostly day laborers doing mid to high level engineering for around 100 bucks a day no health benefits. It's bad.Dear god ..... they are actually transforming the Simpson in a documentary.
How could it be designed to be accidentally turned off in the first place ? bah .... at least they "tested" the backup system now.
I am convinced then, let us cross hydro out. Solar+Wind, then.
Oh, and also, in the not so far future, we could operate tiny nuclear reactors in the space, once we solve the dilemma of storing and transporting power. Many of the dangers of radiation becomes less relevant when the operation is carried out in a huge distance from Eath's land/atmosphere.
Sept. 19: 80 gallons of water leaked from fire-fighting pipe damaged during debris removal operations.
Sept. 26: A fence set up to contain radioactive sediment from spilling into the sea was found to have a hole in it.
Sept. 27: After months spent repairing it, a water-treatment machine failed. It was found to be clogged by a piece of rubber that was mistakenly left inside it.
Oct. 2: Workers pumped too much radioactive water into a storage tank, causing it to overflow and spill 110 gallons of radioactive water into the sea.
Oct. 9: Six workers were accidentally doused with highly radioactive water after removing the wrong pipe from equipment.
The Salon has a nice summary of the last month at Fukushima:
Yeah the workers getting splashed with contaminated water was a big one this week. Apparently they built a row of tanks on a slope and placed a level gauge in the highest tank. Well if you've completed elementary you'd know that the highest one will fill up slower than the one on the bottom. So they basically made a mistake that shouldn't have been made at such a level as nuclear plant engineering. I'm glad these guys aren't running the international space station.
The Salon has a nice summary of the last month at Fukushima:
Sept. 19: 80 gallons of water leaked from fire-fighting pipe damaged during debris removal operations.
Sept. 26: A fence set up to contain radioactive sediment from spilling into the sea was found to have a hole in it.
Sept. 27: After months spent repairing it, a water-treatment machine failed. It was found to be clogged by a piece of rubber that was mistakenly left inside it.
Oct. 2: Workers pumped too much radioactive water into a storage tank, causing it to overflow and spill 110 gallons of radioactive water into the sea.
Oct. 9: Six workers were accidentally doused with highly radioactive water after removing the wrong pipe from equipment.
Yeah the workers getting splashed with contaminated water was a big one this week. Apparently they built a row of tanks on a slope and placed a level gauge in the highest tank. Well if you've completed elementary you'd know that the highest one will fill up slower than the one on the bottom. So they basically made a mistake that shouldn't have been made at such a level as nuclear plant engineering. I'm glad these guys aren't running the international space station.
Where is that, Slovenia?
are we sure it is accurate ? what is the source aside the blog ?For those too lazy to click on Fuji's link.
Unbelievable.
are we sure it is accurate ? what is the source aside the blog ?
are we sure it is accurate ? what is the source aside the blog ?
For those too lazy to click on Fuji's link.
Unbelievable.
Looks like surveyors made some big mistakes.ЯAW;85643485 said:Seems like Mainichi's source comes directly from TEPCO. TEPCO officials are admiting their error in installing the tank.
This one is in Slovenia, it is small research reactor near Ljubljana. We have our own nuclear plant in Krško.No idea, It's just a little research/isotope production reactor though, some universities have them.
What this tells me is that clearly Solar/Wind /Hydro is the way to go. Negligible differences compared to Nuclear WITHOUT the insanely long-term risk that Nuclear poses to ourselves and our environment. Not to mention that the STAIN Chernobyl has put on the earth's face around the accident zone is not expressable with a human death / tw ratio. Same goes for Fukushima.
Japanese PM eats seafood caught off Fukushima
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...ese-PM-eats-seafood-caught-off-Fukushima.html
Sayonara, Abe-san.
Japanese PM eats seafood caught off Fukushima
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...ese-PM-eats-seafood-caught-off-Fukushima.html
http://i.telegraph.co.uk/multimedia/archive/02709/shinzo_2709291b.jpg
Sayonara, Abe-san.
On the bright side, they didn't have to cook it as it was already boiled when they caught it.
Radiation levels in groundwater under Tokyo Electric Power Co.’s Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant are soaring, Tepco said Friday after taking samples from an observation well.
Tepco said 400,000 becquerels per liter of beta ray-emitting substances such as strontium were detected in water sampled Thursday from the well located some 15 meters from a storage tank that leaked about 300 tons of highly radioactive water in August.
The level of becquerels, a record high for water in that well, was up 6,500-fold from the 61 becquerels found Wednesday.
But that plan appears in jeopardy because the sharp increase in the levels of radioactive materials in the observation well suggest the radioactive groundwater is spreading.
By law, water containing beta particle-emitting substances exceeding certain levels cannot be released into the sea. The upper limit is set at 30 becquerels per liter for strontium-90 and 60 becquerels for cesium-134.
Tepco also said water collected Thursday from a drainage ditch near the leaky tank contained 34,000 becquerels of beta particle-emitting substances per liter, compared with 2,300 becquerels the day before
Officials said Thursday they will solicit proposals from both domestic and overseas nuclear experts and firms on how best to scrap the ruined reactors at Fukushima No. 1.
The International Research Institute for Nuclear Decommissioning will publicly seek ideas as early as this month, an institute official said
The clean-up of the exclusion zone around the crippled plant was initially due to be completed by next March.
...
The government's latest prediction is that residents will be able to return home by 2017.
...
Ministry officials cited several reasons for the delay, including a lack of space for the waste from the decontamination work.
On Sunday, the rainwater run-off - which becomes contaminated when it hits polluted surfaces areas - overflowed concrete barriers surrounding a group of tanks, reports citing the Tokyo Electric Power Company (Tepco) say.
Tepco says that in one area, readings of Strontium-90 were at 70 times the legal limit for safe disposal.
"Our pumps could not keep up with the rainwater. As a result, it flowed over some containment areas," Tepco spokesman, Yoshikazu Nagai, told Reuters news agency.
More rains are expected in Japan, with meteorologists forecasting a typhoon to make landfall this week.
The Olympics are going to be Rad.
Is there an actual reason why the government hasn't taken over from the quite obviously incompetent TEPCO like years ago? Oh and what happened to the international assistance?TEPCO is brazenly skirting their responsibility for cleanup compensation for the surrounding area of their failed power plant in Fukushima. The article sounds like it's TEPCOs decision if they should be funding cleanup or not and how much. This is the wrong attitude for the company to have.
While I believe the cleanup procedures that are being carried out by the government is laughably amateurish and often do more to concentrate the pollution than remove it , TEPCO is being given way too much say in all this. They shouldn't be calling the shots here. They should be bleeding money till many years after the fact.
Here's a link to the Japan Times article. It's so sickening what they are getting away with.
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013/10/29/national/tepco-refuses-to-fund-outside-cleanup/
I've been telling people, if you want to forget about Fukushima, go to Japan.Its pretty disturbing how little coverage this is getting in the media in Japan. Mass media anyway. There were reports of the leaks and cracks but there was so little info given in the basic morning news reports over like 5mins max, compared to the fucking 45mins they give to covering baseball each morning...
& I realize Abe tries to be mr. likeable and all, but he needs to crack some heads with this one.
Is there an actual reason why the government hasn't taken over from the quite obviously incompetent TEPCO like years ago? Oh and what happened to the international assistance?
NEWS FLASH - URGENT - December 28, 2013 11:00 PM EST -- (TRN http://www.TurnerRadioNetwork.com ) -- Persons residing on the west coast of North America should IMMEDIATELY begin preparing for another possible onslaught of dangerous atmospheric radiation from the Fukushima nuclear disaster site in Japan. The Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) says radioactive steam has suddenly begun emanating from previously exploded nuclear reactor building #3 at the Fukuishima disaster site in Japan.
On December 28, 2013, the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) admitted steam was seen billowing out of reactor building #3, saying the steam appeared to be coming from what's left of the fifth floor of the mostly-destroyed building. It is widely known that persons cannot get inside Reactor Building #3 because it is severely damaged and highly radioactive, so TEPCO cannot state for certain what is happening in that building or why. TEPCO admits they do not know why this steam is being generated, but matter-of-factly revealed today (December 28) the steam was first spotted on December 19 for a short period of time, then again on December 24 and again on December 25.