The_Inquisitor
Member
This is mostly do-able for me as I am constantly half-marathon training and most days I am running 40-65 minutes. The issue is my job is relatively sedentary (I do get up and walk around).
Walking is meaningful exercise. And it's good on the joints too.
Unless you're at a job where you're walking/on your feet the whole day, this is an unrealistic and unreasonable goal. Sure, you could squeeze this in on the days when you're not working, but for the majority of the population who have jobs that aren't mobile, to do this every day is an unrealistic and unreasonable goal.
It really isn't if you don't drive literally everywhere.
True, but for most of the population, it's not a realistic goal, since everyone is so dependent on their cars.
Just do a hard 30 minute workout. Walking is barely effective as exercise.
Yeah, but you don't have to be dependent on your car. And if you absolutely have to be because of a lack of public transit, then set aside an hour for walking.
I think you mean "I can still gain weight if I eat bad AND don't do real excercise." How do you gain weight if you're walking 20k steps and eating properly?I walk 20k+ steps every day and can still gain weight if I eat bad or don't do real excercise. I've never seen any real relation between the amount of steps I do and my weight. I only lose weight if I do real cardio like running or cycling or specifically diet.
Same would go for anyone who is eating too much compared to what they burn, including people who lift. No one is proposing that 15k steps means you can ignore how you eat. Same as I'm sure you're not proposing you can lift and get "super fit" without caring about what you eat.Your average nurse will get to 20k+ in a single 12 hour shift, but obesity is still a pretty big problem in the profession.
We shouldn't make new step goals, we need new nutrition goals
30 miles a day all year in NYC?
good for you, if it's true. that is super not-normal.
i can basically circumnavigate Toronto proper in 50km (30 miles) on my bike but i certainly can't do it all year.
if you are doing 17k steps in addition to the 50km bike ride then idontbelieveyou.gif
Exercise bike! I don't have a death wish!Did you really bike 25 miles last Tuesday?
Yeah... it's too inefficient to just walk as your sole exercise. 5-10k steps plus some push ups and sit ups, or something else that doesn't just involve your legs, makes more sense.
I think you mean "I can still gain weight if I eat bad AND don't do real excercise." How do you gain weight if you're walking 20k steps and eating properly?
I walk 20k+ steps every day and can still gain weight if I eat bad or don't do real excercise. I've never seen any real relation between the amount of steps I do and my weight. I only lose weight if I do real cardio like running or cycling or specifically diet.
My BMI is around 22-23 so that's probably a factor, but I know that if I walk significantly less steps one week (say I'm off work or something) I don't gain or lose weight any differently than when I'm walking my regular 20k.
Walking just doesn't seem to be a factor at all. I guess if you go from doing next to nothing to 15k a day it would help, but that would probably only be if you went for a semi strenuous walk. Not just walking for 30 seconds a lot.
Of course they are related, but they are not the same. A healthy diet will not protect anybody from the effects of a sedentary lifestyle. You still must move.The 2 things are actually interrelated. From a biological perspective, not moving slows your metabolism, which tricks your body into thinking food is not available or that its availability is on the wane (because mobility and energy expenditure are limited in cold months when food is not readily available in natural environments). Your body compensates for this perceived lack of availability by craving food and then overeating as a result due to wanting to store up calories as fat before food availability becomes scarce or non-existent.
Run 5k each day. Takes like 30 minutes or less.
Some research doc I saw a few weeks ago showed that a 5min super intense workout was better than an hour of moderate workout, and they showed some amazing results with elderly folks.
The design of our cities is the one killing us all in America. Walking when you don't have to think about it is the best way to do it and it's hard to do in most of America's city.
Y'all must've sucked ass on Pokémon GO. Even 10000 steps is too much?
Unless you're at a job where you're walking/on your feet the whole day, this is an unrealistic and unreasonable goal. Sure, you could squeeze this in on the days when you're not working, but for the majority of the population who have jobs that aren't mobile, to do this every day is an unrealistic and unreasonable goal.
I drive 1 hour into work in the morning and then 1.25 hours to get home. I work 8-9 hours daily and when I get home I spend whatever time I have left with my child before she goes to sleep. At this point in time my wife and I finally get to spend a little time with each other before we fall asleep and repeat. We can't do late night walks because our child is asleep and if we staggered our physical activity so one walks early while the other walks late, then we would never see each other.
We used to ride bikes and loved it before she got pregnant. I'm thinking of getting those stands that basically turns your bike into a bike machine.
Not possible, unfortunately. Thinking about getting something so I can move at night and at home.
Unless you live in a walking city that's a bit of an extreme target. That's roughly 7 miles. Each day. If you live outside of a walking city, a few miles of cardio and a grocery run maybe gets you 4.5 miles.
I don't drive, and the bus stop to get to work is a fair distance from my house, so I'm generally looking at about 7k on a normal workday (there and back again). That's without any specific intent to walk more.thats fucking ridiculous. I have been trying to hit 10,000 steps the past six months and have only gotten to 7k once.