viakado said:
what's more foolish is rage-quitting on a scrimmage, just because i didn't play man-D on JJ.:lol
c'mon man....
you didn't play on-ball-d at all. don't play it down. even diddy chimed in and said you slack with on-ball-d. i'm not the only one who thinks you don't play on-ball-d.
i ran 6 set plays all of which had you not playing on-ball-d unless it was on bibby.
- ran 3 plays for josh smith and none of them had you playing duncan on him. the only thing remotely close to you playing on-ball-d was when you switched to duncan, then immediately switched off back to tp.
- ran a play for marvin williams, you didn't play on-ball-d with him either. you switched back to tp and attempted to play passing lanes. ran another play with marvin williams holding the ball, which had bibby running of a series of screens, but you didn't play marvin nor did you play bibby with tp. you switched off to duncan on the weak side.
- after running my last play for jj, and you not playing on-ball-d, i took the shot and waited for the next moment possible to quit the game--after you either scored or turned the ball over.
and you're right, it's just a scrim, which is why i quit--there's no repercussion.
i wasn't going to waste another 28 minutes to play against a cpu controlled spurs defense. it's that simple. i can waste time playing the spurs offline, which is, effectually, the same experience as playing you.
also, i never called you out by name. i've never called you names, nor have i insinuated that you're a raging pussy nerd who exploits. it's really simple to act like a civil adult--considering you are 29 years old this should be something that you're familiar with.