I'm not critizing any characters for not being black enough. Japanese games have a history with a lack of black characters. The problem is that people assume dark skin = black, which it isn't. Because Sean has dark skin, doesn't mean he's Black. Go search for the Suikoden III Hugo is black thread from the other week. We talk about this very subject. So when discussing Black characters I'm quite cognizant of how I interpret who is Black, especially when discussing who is a reapectable Black character.
You shouldn't take that is me saying a character isn't Black enough. You should be seeing me as questioning if whether or not a specific character really is Black to begin with as the original artist intent.
There's nothing wrong with being "too Arab" but as SF's first Arab character he's a walk stereotype.
Sure, fighting games historically made up their casts around stereotypes around the world in the past, but because it's something its always done doesn't make it inherently right. Plus, there are many options for someone who wants a respectable white dude or a respectable Asian dude that's not a stereotype. But when you want to play a Black character you can't have it unless he looks likes a complete thug (Balrog) or is always smiling like a joke character even while getting hit (Dee Jay). From the Turkish oil wrestler who doesn't even look human (Hakan) to the stereotypical Arab (Rashid), when wanting to play more dark skinned characters usually the rule is to expect a caricature. I'm not sure how that's okay in 2016.
And now I have to deal with the female characters being DOA-ized as well.
The problem with your stance is that you're being extremely selective and dismissive of portrayals you don't consider ideal, and that's a similar bias as those who only picture people of these groups as looking a certain way. Like for example, recently I just rewatched an episode of Flavor of Love. I don't know why, but I did. And Flavor Flav, of course, acts rambunctiously and like a clown. I can see how acting that way is considered a negative stereotype to a degree.
However, I definitely recall many people saying he
looked like a stereotype as well, even when you remove the clock and the horns and just put him in normal clothes. These are the same sorts who'd claim Harriet Tubman looks like a stereotype, etc. And for a while I agreed with that without question, but lately I decided to look within myself and wonder....if
I'm the problem in supporting that train of thought.
I imagine you would have a problem with a black character who looked like Flavor Flav in a game, and consider that a stereotype. But what if there are black people who happen to look like Flav? If you're saying that's a stereotype don't they have just as much a right to say you're discriminating against them b/c they don't meet an ideal of beauty you prefer when it comes to black representation? Wouldn't you (or others) considering that a stereotype, say more about you than it does about that type of person?
That shouldn't be used as a cop-out excuse by devs to only put in black people of that description within their works, but more as a cautionary tale for those who demand only one specific type of representation, as that eventually limits and typecasts the gamut either way. We also need to understand that there are
positive,
negative, and
neutral stereotypes.
Balrog/Bison, for example, I would consider a neutral stereotype. He's based off of boxer Mike Tyson's early/mid-90s persona, and was extremely accurate to that in a simplified way. Balrog doesn't represent all black people....he doesn't have to, anyway. And in fact, Rashid is another example of someone I'd classify as a neutral stereotype, and there may be those who see him as a positive stereotype (myself, for example).
Why? Well, he doesn't embody any of the personality traits associated with negative portrayals of Arabs in the media. He's not a crazed Quran-quoting terrorist lunatic. He doesn't talk about bombs or degrading women, preaching hatred for the West, etc. To me he seems like a normal guy, maybe something of a playful rich guy (like Ken) who just happens to be Arab. Same with F.A.N.G. in terms of being a neutral stereotype, Chun-Li being a positive stereotype, etc. People should
really go study more on the fuller use of the word and understand that not all stereotypes are inherently negative.
Also, I remember that Hugo thread. I posted there. I still stand by my positions in that thread. Who are we to infer the artist's intent without them saying as such? If the contextual evidence is strong enough than yeah, but often it isn't and we see just as many people claiming a character "can't possibly be black" in those instances because reasons, as we see people attempting to claim certain fair-skinned anime characters as being white because they may happen to have blond hair or blue eyes.
In both cases, you're already working with pre-conceived notions of what qualifies as "black" or "white" or whatever in your head, and often times those notions are based on exaggerated expectations. And usually the justification of people falling on those arguments goes back to details that essentially boil down to stereotypes, usually negative stereotypes to be specific.
The more alarming thing is how easy/swiftly people seem to dismiss a character as being black or another given ethnic minority if they don't meet all the checkboxes upon a first glance. It's like mentally putting a barrier in front of yourself for no good reason. I think people should just slow down and get to know the characters more as characters first before then trying to dismiss them possibly being this or that, because by that point, even if they're able to then more astutely identify a character's ethnicity, they'll realize how little that matters in defining the character (a well-written character, mind you) and relating with them to a large extent.
EDIT: Also, Guile is literally a walking stereotype. The difference is in knowing what type of stereotype he is. He technically falls into a neutral/positive stereotype, but I'm sure there are some who may see him as a negative stereotype, as as those who see Balrog as such. I can't say they're wrong in thinking that, just that I'm likely able to argue against their idea of them being negative much better than they are in claiming why they're negative.