$600 for a CPU just seems insane to me, I mean really?
http://www.guru3d.com/article/cpu-scaling-in-games-with-quad-core-processors/1
http://www.guru3d.com/article/cpu-scaling-in-games-with-quad-core-processors/1
Ikuu said:$600 for a CPU just seems insane to me, I mean really?
http://www.guru3d.com/article/cpu-scaling-in-games-with-quad-core-processors/1
Especially considering that Nehelem is releasing next month. I'm surprised people are not waiting to build their new $1000+ PC around Intel's new chipset. Some websites are reporting that there will be no more new Core 2 Quad chips after the 8300, which means you will have to upgrade your mobo and buy new memory if you want to upgrade your processor in a year or two.BCD2 said:Yeah, the cpu... it's fuckin' 600 bones. This is just tossing money out the window.
chespace said:Great article. Hmmm.......choices!
Zzoram said:Just get the Q9450 with no heatsinkfan I mentioned above, since you're buying a heatsinkfan anyways.
http://www.ncixus.com/products/29316/EU80569PJ067N/Intel/
It's $12 cheaper than the retail box with HSF.
OR
Wait for the Nehalem CPUs on the new motherboards (P55 probably ideal for you, X58 is going to be insanely priced). However, this means you'll need DDR3 RAM.
chespace said:After reading the guru3d article about CPU scaling and games, I wonder if quad core 2 is really the way to go? Wouldn't I be no worse off just getting this?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115036
Well, you have to remember that a year or two ago dual core processors were getting outperformed by their single core counterparts in most titles. You don't want to be stuck with halved framerates in a year when the new titles being released are programmed to use all four cores.chespace said:After reading the guru3d article about CPU scaling and games, I wonder if quad core 2 is really the way to go? Wouldn't I be no worse off just getting this?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115036
And it rocks, right?! Tell him how much it rocks!Zzoram said:Being price conscious, I bought:
E8400 @ 3.0GHz
Mushkin HP2 4GB DDR2 800mhz
Seagate 7200rpm 500GB SATA
Antec 900 ATX Gaming Case
Visiontek HD4870 512mb
Antec Earthwatts 500W PSU
Samsung 2253BW
Cheapo Logitech wired keyboard
Logitech G5 wired laser mouse
reused old speakers
Surge protector
It came to ~$1400 after tax.
SapientWolf said:Well, you have to remember that a year or two ago dual core processors were getting outperformed by their single core counterparts in most titles. You don't want to be stuck with halved framerates in a year when the new titles being released are programmed to use all four cores.
chespace said:After reading the guru3d article about CPU scaling and games, I wonder if quad core 2 is really the way to go? Wouldn't I be no worse off just getting this?
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115036
SapientWolf said:Well, you have to remember that a year or two ago dual core processors were getting outperformed by their single core counterparts in most titles. You don't want to be stuck with halved framerates in a year when the new titles being released are programmed to use all four cores.
Trax416 said:Instead of buying a $400 Quad Core now, that will be out dated in a year. He could buy a $160 E8400 cpu, that outperforms any quad core in or around it's price range on 99 percent of games currently. Then grab the same quad core he wanted to get for $400, in a year for $160.
I see, but I was replying to a post about laptops.Zzoram said:On desktops, the 8800GT and 8800GT 512 were die shrinks of the original 8800GTS 320/640 and 8800GTX. On the desktop, the 9800GT and 9800GTX+ are the same die size as 8800GT and 8800GTS.
DarthWoo said:Here's pretty much my final system. All I have left to order is the SATA hard drive and maybe a new OS.
-Intel Pentium Dual Core E5200 2.5GHz (Hoping to OC to 3.0)
-Rosewill RCX-Z775-EX R Cooler (Though some say the E5200 OCs to 3.0 easy with stock cooler, I just feel better having this.)
-ASUS P5Q Pro
-Patriot 4GB (2x2GB) 800MHz RAM
-EVGA Geforce 9600GT SSC Edition
-PC Power & Cooling 610W PSU
-ASUS DVD-ROM (I've always found that burners tend to take longer to read discs than just a plain drive for some reason, even if they're rated at the same read speed, plus I prefer to have a separate drive for just everyday non-burning needs.)
-LG DVD-RW
-80GB Seagate Barracuda HDD (One of my old PATA hard drives I'm reusing.)
-160GB Maxtor HDD (Another old hard drive, but it's never been used since I bought it a few years ago, so I hope it wasn't DOA back then. )
-Antec SX1300 case (From my old system. Has four case fans, one front inward, one side inward, two rear outward.)
Would it be worth it to get Vista Home Premium 64-bit for a system of this spec? I read all the back and forth on the issue, and I know that 4GB seems to be the borderline. Apparently it's just barely too high to be used completely by a 32-bit OS, but only just barely enough for Vista? I'm planning to just get the system builder version from Newegg for $100, but is there any cheaper way?
I've heard that with an upgrade version, you can actually install it without entering the key, making it think it's actually a trial version, and then install it on top of itself with the key, thus making it full? Is it true that upgrade versions of Vista otherwise require you to still install your prior OS and then install Vista on top?
Have I forgotten anything important for my system? If I get an $80 HDD and Windows Vista, I'll have spent around $650 after rebates and shipping, hopefully that sounds about right.
DarthWoo said:-ASUS DVD-ROM (I've always found that burners tend to take longer to read discs than just a plain drive for some reason, even if they're rated at the same read speed, plus I prefer to have a separate drive for just everyday non-burning needs.)
-LG DVD-RW
-80GB Seagate Barracuda HDD (One of my old PATA hard drives I'm reusing.)
-160GB Maxtor HDD (Another old hard drive, but it's never been used since I bought it a few years ago, so I hope it wasn't DOA back then. )
Lol, downgrade the PSU and get a 4850 with the money saved instead ^^SRG01 said:... Why are you getting a 9600GT? And a 610W PSU?
zoku88 said:Lol, downgrade the PSU and get a 4850 with the money saved instead ^^
Pachinko said:So I did a bunch of research into this Nehelam core that's coming out from intel and I think it's pretty damn obvious why people are buying new pc's right now, the processor isn't out until october/november and it's 1000 bucks , sure it's most definetly faster but generally most of us here seem to prefer sticking with computer budgets around the 1500 mark , spending 2/3rds of that on a fancy new processor doesn't leave a whole lot of room for much else.
On the plus side for those that don't mind socket 775 the prices will continue to drop and checking benchmarks you can get a very smooth running crysis at high res without too much money if that's truly all you care about.
Pachinko said:So I did a bunch of research into this Nehelam core that's coming out from intel and I think it's pretty damn obvious why people are buying new pc's right now, the processor isn't out until october/november and it's 1000 bucks , sure it's most definetly faster but generally most of us here seem to prefer sticking with computer budgets around the 1500 mark , spending 2/3rds of that on a fancy new processor doesn't leave a whole lot of room for much else.
On the plus side for those that don't mind socket 775 the prices will continue to drop and checking benchmarks you can get a very smooth running crysis at high res without too much money if that's truly all you care about.
DarthWoo said:As for the 9600GT, it was $60 after rebate, and I didn't really plan on buying anything that needed the more expensive cards.
bee said:nah thats the high end one
Intel Core i7 920, Price (in thousand unit quantities) $284
Chiggs said:Too bad i7 isn't all that impressive with gaming.
Some manufacturers have warranties that cover that.Blizzard said:The computer you guys helped build is nice. But, I just found what -looks- kinda like a stuck pixel, but is actually dust or something behind the monitor...and I even keep it covered when not in use. Ugh.
zoku88 said:Some manufacturers have warranties that cover that.
EDIT: Oops, didnt finished reading.
Was the dust there before you got it?
Hazaro said:To the people with the Dual/Quad argument, buy a E7200/E5200 if what mostly you are doing is gaming, then buy the Quad when you need it down the line at half the price what you would of spent 2 years ago.
You don't even need to reinstall Windows for a CPU change.
JudgeN said:E5200 has a 800 FSB and 2MB cache that will effect your gaming performance alot. I do not recommend it for gaming unless you have to go that cheap. As far as the Quad thing goes, if you want a quad get a Q6600 the new batches have very low VID and can overclock to 3.8Gig on air easy. Hell I have my Q6600 at 3.8 on air with a noctua NH-U12P heatsink/fan, keeps this beast cool as shit. I could probably get 4 gig with it if i wanted too.
JudgeN said:E5200 has a 800 FSB and 2MB cache that will effect your gaming performance alot. I do not recommend it for gaming unless you have to go that cheap. As far as the Quad thing goes, if you want a quad get a Q6600 the new batches have very low VID and can overclock to 3.8Gig on air easy. Hell I have my Q6600 at 3.8 on air with a noctua NH-U12P heatsink/fan, keeps this beast cool as shit. I could probably get 4 gig with it if i wanted too.
Hazaro said:Uhh no?
It won't?
Also most Q6600 do not clock that fast.
On the latest Supreme Commander benchmark charts all the quad cores outperform all the dual core (with the exception being the 8600 beating the low end Phenoms). Supreme Commander is one of the only games that scales across all four cores. So if this trend continues in the future you'd be better off with the Q6600 than the E8400, which only costs $30 more.Trax416 said:Instead of buying a $400 Quad Core now, that will be out dated in a year. He could buy a $160 E8400 cpu, that outperforms any quad core in or around it's price range on 99 percent of games currently. Then grab the same quad core he wanted to get for $400, in a year for $160.
SapientWolf said:On the latest Supreme Commander benchmark charts all the quad cores outperform all the dual core (with the exception being the 8600 beating the low end Phenoms). Supreme Commander is one of the only games that scales across all four cores. So if this trend continues in the future you'd be better off with the Q6600 than the E8400, which only costs $30 more.
For now, most other games are GPU instead of CPU limited so it doesn't make a whole lot of sense to buy a dual core just for the small performance increase over quad (that you'll only notice in benchmarks). In the near term, you'd be better off upgrading your GPU and keeping the same processor.
Hazaro said:Either way it comes down to predicting the future. Like you said, if the trend continues.
Chiggs said:It will definitely shift that way until we hit the holy grail of computing, the "system on a chip."
Hazaro said:Uhh no?
It won't?
Also most Q6600 do not clock that fast.
zoku88 said:8GB :lol :lol
chespace said:It's only 65 bucks for the 2nd pair. :lol
Anyway, I have a copy of Vista Ultimate sitting here unopened so I figured, why the hell not.
Kosma said:Chespace, I really hope you will end up playing some games on that beast
Any ideas of what you will try first?
The witcher is also good from what I played.chespace said:Crysis
Crysis: Warhead
STALKER
STALKER Clear Sky
Fallout 3
In that order.
I'm gonna pull the trigger on this rig tomorrow first thing. Should be here by the end of the week. Newegg is so good... shipping is only like $19.78. How is that even possible?