But haven't you been keeping up with this thread? The VC is dead. Nintendo doesn't care. Third parties have lost interest...Capndrake said:Ok, you US RCR fans can stop complaining: http://wii.ign.com/articles/867/867001p1.html
No.Y2Kev said:Is either N64 castlevania on the VC?
Y2Kev said:Is either N64 castlevania on the VC?
Speevy said:No, but I'd buy the first one in a second if they put it on there.
crowphoenix said:That seems odd. Have you played it before or are you just a huge CV fan?
crowphoenix said:That seems odd. Have you played it before or are you just a huge CV fan?
Speevy said:Played it before. Why is that odd?
MoxManiac said:The N64 Castlevanias aren't as bad as the internet makes you believe.
They're better than IGA's PS2 ones, at the very least.
Jiggy37 said:If I were to only get one out of River City Ransom and Double Dragon, which would GAF recommend?
crowphoenix said:I own them both. Most people will tell you there terrible, so I never expected anyone to want them on VC. I was just curious. The first one was fine up until that stupid nitroglicern puzzle. I actually spent a while trying to word that in a way as to not sound like a dick. :lol
That's debatable. I agree that the second PS2 one is worse, but I think over all LoI may be better. But it's hard for me to compare . I went into CV64 with such high expectations that LoI would have to set fire to my foot and kill my dog to hit that level of disappointment.
Speevy said:to each his own?
Dr. Zoidberg said:It also says that Double Dragon is coming. We all know the NES version of DD1 was pretty weak.
DD2 NES, on the other hand, was probably the best beat-em-up on the system, IMO.
Jiggy37 said:If I were to only get one out of River City Ransom and Double Dragon, which would GAF recommend?
A Black Falcon said:Hey, the first two had console versions too... though yeah, they weren't console first.
A Black Falcon said:That quote very strongly implies that they lost their copies and are just hoping that someone somewhere has one, sadly, I think....
CTLance said:Ooooh. Dankeschön.
Barring that, and judging from the sales of the VC releases, what's your stance on a new "Super Turrican++" using these (or similar) tools for a VC or Wiiware release?
That's all.
which one do you think?Scrubking said:What version of Double Dragon are we getting?
Jiggy37 said:Are there any plans to bring the Commodore 64 Turricans to the European VC?
Turrican said:There certainly is nobody out there who would have it, as far as we know. But the Factor 5 archive is pretty well maintained. There are a few gems in there. One was the 8-player Sega Genesis Bomberman using two 4 player multi-adaptors which we did because we loved Bomberman '93 on the PC Engine so much. Sega went crazy over it and asked Hudson to go with F5 for Mega Bomberman, but politics prevailed and Probe got the deal which resulted in a port of Bomberman '94 with just 4 players.
Another one is a Genesis version of Indiana Jones - Greatest Adventures that never saw the light of day due to the demise of U.S.Gold in the UK.
So, that Super Turrican - Director's Cut is certainly not lost. Just slightly delayed![]()
Turrican said:The first two had console versions that made us at Factor 5 cringe. We felt they had butchered our babies with those mediocre ports of T1 and 2. The graphics were slightly worse, Chris' Amiga soundtracks were terribly transcribed, but, to their credit, playability was OK.
Worst of all, everybody at F5 loved consoles, so we we knew what the SNES and Genesis really were able to do and that we could do so much more if Nintendo and Sega would just let us get access to their hardware.
That's why we look at Super Turrican as the first console Turrican game. Anybody who wants to enjoy T1 and 2 should really, really do it on the Amiga.
Turrican said:None at this point. It would be great to see C64 go worldwide on VC, though. Being optimistic one could even see the Atari 800 on VC. Just imagine playing M.U.L.E. with 4 Wii Remotes.
Well, it's not this thread, but on the forums of the site I work for (VC Reviews), there's a person who's on the Commodore 64 VC development team.DavidDayton said:Wait a second... does this represent the first time we've had a member of a development team/company for a VC title pop up in the VC thread, or did I miss something?
DaBargainHunta said:After many depressing months on the VC with very few highlights along the way, I am on cloud nine right now. Beat-em-ups may be a dead genre, but for those of us who remember the late '80s and early '90s, you know what all the hoopla was about.
I never did play River City Ransom, so I'm excited to finally be able to own it.
The NES version of Double Dragon is the best version of that game (except for the lack of 2P) and my personal favorite NES game ever. I don't care that it wasn't faithful to the arcade. Its differences are what made it special. Yeah, a lot of that is nostalgia talking. I don't expect anyone else to agree with me, and that's fine.
Renegade, I'm sure, is going to be the weakest of this lot - but I'm still excited for it. It sure as hell beats some of the other crap we've been getting lately (Bases Loaded, Operation Wolf w/ no lightgun support, etc.).
Good times are here again on the VC!![]()
My #1 favorite NES game. Time to buy some more point cards.Capndrake said:Ok, you US RCR fans can stop complaining: http://wii.ign.com/articles/867/867001p1.html
A Black Falcon said:That's a good question... does Factor 5 just have the rights to the Turrican games it made itself (the Amiga ports of 1 and 2 and the three console titles), or do they also have the rights to the C64 games? Does what you say here mean that Factor 5 doesn't have those rights?
Turrican said:Factor 5 owns the Turrican name and trademark and rights to release the games worldwide. The question that would come up is more about multiple platform releases of the same game, since the Amiga versions would have priority.
Turrican 2, BTW, was not a port. The Amiga version was the lead platform for T2 with the C64, Atari ST, Spectrum and Amstrad being developed concurrently. Turrican 1 is the interesting one since it did start life on the C64 but does not contain one of the main hallmarks of the series, Chris Huelsbeck's great music. The Amiga version was started about halfway through, stopped again after it became clear that a simple 1-person port would not do, and re-started with a whole team to be treated as an original Amiga game. That's when the soundtrack came in, the controls were done from scratch as was all the tech, and the graphics were re-done once an initial attempt to use modified C64 graphics was rejected. In the sum of things and specifically because of the music the Amiga version of Turrican 1 is the most complete, but of course there are fans who would love to see the C64 or Atari ST versions as well.
Thanks again for your enthusiasm about the games!
Hi! Glad you remember me.Turrican said:there are fans who would love to see the ... Atari ST versions as well.
It's the same publisher PEGI lists for C64 games, so it's probably the C64 version.Nebulus
Publisher: Kaasa solution GmbH
Alterseinstufung: Freigegeben ohne Altersbeschränkung gemäß § 14 JuSchG
Prüfdatum: 15.04.2008 USK Nr.: 21316/08
Sprache: englisch System: Nintendo Wii
Genre: Jump 'n Run
On the bright side, it's a big name title. I know PS III is supposed to be the worst, but is it bad overall or just as a Phantasy Star?Capndrake said:EU VC update (Nooo, back to 1 game):
-Phantasy Star III: Generations of Doom
que?830920 said:Seriously, Nintendo...
Jiggy37 said:If I were to only get one out of River City Ransom and Double Dragon, which would GAF recommend?
EphemeralDream said:que?
Only getting one game would make for a bad week regardless of what that game is. Sorry, Europe.830920 said:Another bad VC week, if you're not really into Phantasy Star.
World Games
Publisher: Kaasa solution GmbH
Alterseinstufung: Freigegeben ohne Altersbeschränkung gemäß § 14 JuSchG
Prüfdatum: 04.04.2008 USK Nr.: 21224/08
Sprache: englisch System: Nintendo Wii
Genre: Sportspiel
Capndrake said:Japanese update next Tuesday:
-Hercules no Eikou IV (SFC)
-Phelios (MD)
-Dracula X: Chi no Rondo (PCE)
-Metal Slug (Neo Geo)
Somehow missed another C64 game rated by the USK as well:
Capndrake said:Japanese update next Tuesday:
*snip*
-Dracula X: Chi no Rondo (PCE)
It's very bad as a phantasy star. As an RPG, it's barely passable, but passable nonetheless. Going through and beating it you will get well more than $8 of entertainment value from it.EphemeralDream said:On the bright side, it's a big name title. I know PS III is supposed to be the worst, but is it bad overall or just as a Phantasy Star?