FrenchMovieTheme
Member
Ooooo....can I get the Falcons?
can you throw less than 63 INTs with matt ryan?
Ooooo....can I get the Falcons?
can you throw less than 63 INTs with matt ryan?
So you're saying Ponder to Owusu was too powerful so you had to stop me from doing it, but you didn't want to actually punish anyone except for the first week. I think I got it now!fitz isn't an issue. you're missing the point. i'm saying a lot of this stuff is SUBJECTIVE. if you want to throw to fitz 23 times then do it! i'm not going to suspend him 4 games because i think you could have thrown to other people and just wanted to get him stats. do you get what i'm saying?
Actually I seem to remember you freaking out about Fitz too then backing down when sanjo gave you trouble.
The problem is you set a standard with crow. You took away his player. Hell, last night you were pretty mad about Ramirez on AIM too. But then ram came at you strong and you went backed it down again.
If you say you are gonna do something, do it. You can't just go "fuck it, no rules" when you have to make a decision on something that effects an important game or a person that will stand up to you.
Ramirez stay padded. No doubt. Others have done it to since crow. If you wanna throw me in that conversation for running the ball, go ahead. Stop being a pussy
You have been less than consistent this year and i cant point to why that is, but its especially jarring. Its why i didnt want to be involved with the shadow council anymore.
Guys guys, I'll just leave the league if Fitz is going to be an issue.
I only wish I had a QB-WR combo for people to complain about.
hell i beat cola 63-3 and scored a couple rushing TD's with gore in the final 2 minutes! now i can say "well he threw a pick and i ran the ball in on the goal line!" but couldn't i have just run it up the gut into the linemen and ran more clock? yeah, i could have. doesn't that constitute padding gores stats?
but remember, stat padding and running up the score don't necessarily have to happen in the same game. i understand it was a close game.... but 23 catches? i can make the case that he was just padding fitz' stats!
and the main thing with ramirez game is that it happened against the CPU. i can go look through most CPU games played and say "well this looks like stat padding to me" to different degrees
You can borrow one of mine, I don't really need both of them. I do need a defense though. Maybe we can trade?
can you throw less than 63 INTs with matt ryan?
I understand that don't go hand in hand but at the same time has Fitz had another 20 catch game? I could make the argument he had a game of a lifetime within the confines of a game.
running up the score AND stat padding is the crime here. The fact he tried to mask the running up the score by punting in the redzone is downright shameless. Yes coming from me
Its whatever. I like the rules. They should stay. If user catching is allowed, we will have to change addresses. www.madengaf.com/sharkwaters
DCX
I understand that don't go hand in hand but at the same time has Fitz had another 20 catch game? I could make the argument he had a game of a lifetime within the confines of a game.
running up the score AND stat padding is the crime here. The fact he tried to mask the running up the score by punting in the redzone is downright shameless. Yes coming from me
Its whatever. I like the rules. They should stay. If user catching is allowed, we will have to change addresses. www.madengaf.com/sharkwaters
DCX
I don't even know what the main issue is here! I'm just bored in class and want to make this about me.
I understand that don't go hand in hand but at the same time has Fitz had another 20 catch game? I could make the argument he had a game of a lifetime within the confines of a game.
running up the score AND stat padding is the crime here. The fact he tried to mask the running up the score by punting in the redzone is downright shameless. Yes coming from me
Its whatever. I like the rules. They should stay. If user catching is allowed, we will have to change addresses. www.madengaf.com/sharkwaters
DCX
He could throw zero interceptions and still lose them to me
DCX
About you? You tell me your ninja turtles history and then we'll let the topic go to you!
4th and 20 fucking 3!!!!!
if ramirez did this against a human opponent i think it's a different conversation. and it's not that there are "no rules", its that i'm finding more and more that a lot of these issues are subjective (as i have given plenty of examples!) regarding stat padding/running up the score.
hell i beat cola 63-3 and scored a couple rushing TD's with gore in the final 2 minutes! now i can say "well he threw a pick and i ran the ball in on the goal line!" but couldn't i have just run it up the gut into the linemen and ran more clock? yeah, i could have. doesn't that constitute padding gores stats?
just think, you both would've been better off. dcx wouldn't have disgraced one of the best offenses in the game and you would have a good team
How is stand padding against the CPU different than a human other than the respect factor? You are still skewing stats, and exploiting AI for XP and glory. You can't have it both ways. You want to be everyones pal instead of making decisions that might make you look like the bad guy. There has been stat padding before and since crow. Against humans and AI. So why was he the only one punished?
4th and 20 fucking 3!!!!!
Wasn't it 4th and 26? I can't remember now, though! Ask Eznark, he should know.
I don't think Ram should be punished. I don't think the rules need changing. I don't think anyone is asking you to please everyone FMT. That seems to be your core argument. That you lose if you do and you lose if you don't, so you just won't. Howabout we stick with what's been working for a little while longer? One person complaining isn't 31 people bitching at you. It just feels that way.
Why you gotta do me like that? Right before I play my playoff game tonight too so I remember those bad memories.
Most garbage come back of all time, two second half return fumbles smh.
Unlike you I can beat the Shredder. I padded stats on him.
I don't think Ram should be punished. I don't think the rules need changing. I don't think anyone is asking you to please everyone FMT. That seems to be your core argument. That you lose if you do and you lose if you don't, so you just won't. Howabout we stick with what's been working for a little while longer? One person complaining isn't 31 people bitching at you. It just feels that way.
I'm just going to score now. I could have taken an INT back to the house when I was up 33 to 7 with 30 seconds left against Cola. However I stopped at the 5, got tackled, and took a knee to end the game. I didn't feel the need to finish off with 40 points.
If others are going to stat pad, so will I.
I'm just going to score now. I could have taken an INT back to the house when I was up 33 to 7 with 30 seconds left against Cola. However I stopped at the 5, got tackled, and took a knee to end the game. I didn't feel the need to finish off with 40 points.
If others are going to stat pad, so will I.
not sure that would've been considered running up the score. i think people have always been of the opinion that returning an INT or fumble for a TD was fair game, no matter the score!
It wasn't working because no one thought FMT would actually do anything. Low and behold!It wasn't working though, people were still running it up/stat padding and not getting punished. Some people started following the new rule and watched their poor WR/QBs get passed up easily. Now I'm not saying it was Ponder, Owusu, or Harvin that got left behind... but it was! Although I think losing Ponder for 4 weeks had more to do with that, really.
I know there isn't a consensus but it just felt like a dick move scoring in that situation.
I thought he was out for me, though. He scared me!
No, you're right, it's stat padding rules that held you back. Not injuries, or terrible defense, or one trick pony offense!It wasn't working though, people were still running it up/stat padding and not getting punished. Some people started following the new rule and watched their poor WR/QBs get passed up easily. Now I'm not saying it was Ponder, Owusu, or Harvin that got left behind... but it was! Although I think losing Ponder for 4 weeks had more to do with that, really.
So what is available to me in CCM now that we're in the playoffs... Is it worth getting on for?
You can look at the league schedule.
i dont want people to just say fuck it im going to put up 80!
Shit, you're suspending ponder for next year already? that's fucked up.