Tathanen
Get Inside Her!
yeah, they're clearly talking about usopp
That makes a lot more sense actually. It feels weird that Luffy's bounty would already be increased, and that the info woulda got out like this.
yeah, they're clearly talking about usopp
yeah, they're clearly talking about usopp
Im thinking not all awakenings are like thatHow would an awakened Gum Gum Fruit even work?
Does he turn everything around him into bouncy rubber?
How would an awakened Gum Gum Fruit even work?
Does he turn everything around him into bouncy rubber?
Im thinking not all awakenings are like that
Yup that's what im thinking and im sure people with a better understanding of rubber properties can come up with alot of other ideas. Brook..im thinking like he'll be able to summon like other astral souls or something he can control i mean hes already bringing the chill from the underworld into his attacksTrue... the awakened Zoans in Impel Down were just savage beasts.
Vulcanization! That's how his awakening would work.
Zoro's love for booze is on the same level as Luffy's love for meat.
I would assume so. That one is easy. The more complicated ones are Robin's and Brooke's fruit.
When your main enemy is a guy with the earthquake and gravity fruits then being able to turn everything into rubber isn't really that bad.
I would assume so. That one is easy. The more complicated ones are Robin's and Brooke's fruit.
"King Riku, who was fucked over by Doflamingo literally royally is going to pay the fee he set up for the game Doflamingo made during the time which he was fucking over King Riku when we hand him over the head of the crew that literally saved him and his whole kingdom."
One piece character logic.
Like, what the hell are they going to even pay with? The entire kingdom is pretty much destroyed. Dressrosa is going to have to be rebuilt from the ground up. They think they have the funds to pay a 500 mill bounty?
I would assume so. That one is easy. The more complicated ones are Robin's and Brooke's fruit.
You mean Darkness.
Issho has the Gravity fruit (or his sword does). Teach's Darkness powers work differently.
If I had to guess...no, I can't even guess anything besides Robin being able to sprout more limbs and Brooke maybe being able to attack or manipulate the souls of others? Idk.
It's not a particularly original or "one-piecey" stretch, this. Bad guys extort good guys for money, whether they have it or not. You see it in crime dramas all the time, they come after some mook's family for the money said mook didn't have, and they killed him over. "Oh if you don't have it you'll have to pay it back in another way." Blah blah.
That said, I don't think they're actually talking about Usopp's bounty, but rather just various existing contracts they had with "the king of Dressrosa." Again, bad dudes, don't care what happened, they just know they're owed something and they're gonna take it. And kill the Straw Hats on the way since they hold them responsible for everything going tits-up.
This isn't just trying to exploit the weak, it's trying to get payed by the weak specifically for the act of exploiting the weak. It makes very little sense. They're assuming Riku is some kind of politically oriented masochist.
Again, they.. don't care. Riku's affiliation is irrelevant, "the guy who owed us is is gone, you give us shit now instead." Pretty by-the-books gangsterism. They obviously don't expect him to say "lol okay," they are going there to TAKE what they feel they are owed.
And it's not Usopp's bounty that they expect Riku to honor. It's the "crucial negotiation with Doflamingo" they were in the middle of. They don't seem particularly aware of or interested in the difference between Doflamingo and Riku, all they know is that one king was deposed for another. I know it's just a fan translation but they refer to him as "this King Riku" after saying "if the king has changed." These goons probably have no idea what's been going on in the kingdom beyond the most superficial of elements.
If you can name me 10 examples of something like this in any given fiction, specifically where criminals expect to be paid by the victims for the crime they are committing against them, I'll concede to the argument.
"King Riku, who was fucked over by Doflamingo literally royally is going to pay the fee he set up for the game Doflamingo made during the time which he was fucking over King Riku when we hand him over the head of the crew that literally saved him and his whole kingdom."
One piece character logic.
Like, what the hell are they going to even pay with? The entire kingdom is pretty much destroyed. Dressrosa is going to have to be rebuilt from the ground up. They think they have the funds to pay a 500 mill bounty?
No, I don't think I'll be doing that.
And that's not what's happening anyway. They had an arrangement with an establishment and the leader of the establishment changed. It's internal politics as far as they're concerned, it does not void their arrangement in their eyes. They're pirates, after all. Feels like something you could see in a Pirates of the Caribbean film beat for beat.
Donflamingo was a schibukai when he announced the bounty right? Maybe they are thinking the government will pay?
It is in the abstract. I didn't want to ask for you to find specifically a case where a pirate went to recieve a bounty for the murder of that person's ally. The point is that the situation was set up by the guy who was specifically opposed to the new guy, and the new guy is only in charge because the people who the bounty was set up on help kick him out. Like, how far is gangster logic supposed to justify this? If King Riku died and dressrosa was destroyed, would they still be demanding his corpse to pay them, just because they are so singlemindedly driven by the fact that they fulfilled a bargain made with another guy?
And no, nothing like that happened in Pirates, as far as I can remember. There were a lot of changes in politics, and obligations are passed down from one to the next, but I can't think of any example where pirates expected to be paid for a blatant act of aggression on a person's allies. And in any case, like you said, they're pirates. They should understand how "I'm not honoring the terms of our agreement for reasons" is a perfectly valid way of going about things.
Because it's an absurd cartoon world? I mean I don't want this to sound like conceding to your initial "lol one piece" argument, but rather it's just how stories in this medium function. It's not the real world, it's obviously abstracted and absurd, it's a goofy shounen manga. Things will always be taken to extremes.
And if Riku died and Dressrosa was destroyed, they'd find the next person in line that they could blame for their deal falling apart. Probably the Straw Hats. Maybe the World Government, given that Doflamingo was a Shichibukai. Maybe they'd just overrun the ruins of the nation, enslave its people, and name theirselves its new defacto rulers. "If you can't pay us in SMILE, you'll pay us with your lives." Maybe even Kaido himself, if they weren't likely mortified by him!
Now as for the lowest IQ... I can't decide the worst one. They're all idiots.
So why is it condescending to go "typical OP" in calling some random ass pirate a moron?
Well, you didn't really just call some random pirate a moron, you said "One piece character logic," trivializing all One Piece characterization. That's a bit easier to object to when you like a fair amount of One Piece characters (and their characterization) like I do. Even if they're mostly charmingly Stupid.
Sexism sounds pretty good right now
D: I know this is sudden, but I have a question for Odacchi.
Why is it that there is an abnormally extensive number of characters in One Piece who have unknown or already deceased mothers? P.N. Navy Blue
O: I see. Well. The answer is simple.
That's because "Mother" is the antonym for "Adventure".
*Please don't write that on a test
It's SBS tho, I wouldn't take any of that really serious. I am all for pointing out sexism in Oda's and any other work, but this is just cheeky banter.
I can believe it. As a kid my mom threatened to whup my ass if I went farther than the block.
Again, the 'it's humor, so it can't mean anything' excuse. Ugh.
Well, then out of pure speculation, what IS the reason for the abnormally high amount of dead mothers? Does Oda just like killing Moms?
Oh, you meant that. I was refering to his cheerful answer. Of course, there is the trope of killing a women to advance characters on their cost. I won't argue anything against that. Constantly dead, evil and otherwise absent parents are a general bane for me.Again, the 'it's humor, so it can't mean anything' excuse. Ugh.
Well, then out of pure speculation, what IS the reason for the abnormally high amount of dead mothers? Does Oda just like killing Moms?
Thats because moms hold you back. Or even parents in general. You dont want them to worry, and you play it safe your whole life.
Oh, you meant that. I was refering to his cheerful answer. Of course, there is the trope of killing a women to advance characters on their cost. I won't argue anything against that. Constantly dead, evil and otherwise absent parents are a general bane for me.
Didn't seem to bother Dragon, Yasopp, or Roger much.
HM I WONDER WHAT THEY ALL POSSIBLY COULD HAVE IN COMMON THAT MOTHERS DON'T
I'm not trivializing it. Trivializing it would be implying that all they are is stupid, and I'm not saying that. I'm remarking on the generalized spread of that characteristic over the series characters as a whole. Which is an accurate generalization, something you admit yourself. It is, therefore, typically one piece.
Since you admit that, your objection isn't that I call them stupid, but stupid in the derogatory. But, unlike you, I'm not charmed by any of their stupidity, I'm more annoyed by it than not. Point of fact, I have a fair amount of contempt for most characters of OP. I have a right to those feelings, as much as you have a right to have the opposite reaction, and I have a right to express them. I'm not going to apologize for that, but I will tell you you'll never catch me insulting you for having feelings you do. OP, as a manga and product, doesn't have that luxury. If you catch me saying something unfair or untrue about OP as a manga, feel free to call me out on that too, but I don't think me calling them stupid is either of those things.
Again, the 'it's humor, so it can't mean anything' excuse. Ugh.
Well, then out of pure speculation, what IS the reason for the abnormally high amount of dead mothers? Does Oda just like killing Moms?
Luckily at no point did I imply you don't have the right to any feelings, or that you are required to apologize for them. I know you generally feel pretty persecuted in this thread, and while I occasionally disagree moreso with the level of interest you have in certain topics than your outright stance on them, you have no need to defend your right to think something. To the same end, I will persist in my enjoyment of One Piece's characters for what they are, and defend the manga when I feel it is appropriate.
Well, Oda likes him a sad backstory. Killing the mother is a bit more emotionally jarring.
Thats because dads are deadbeats and moms are dead.
Hmm. After rereading the chapter (mangastream), are we sure that the 500 million thing was for Luffy? It seems like they were talking about Usopp since they have a negotiation with Doflamingo. And since Doffy was taken out, they are going to talk with King Riku regarding the reward.
Great chapter, having them refuse Luffy's refusal was great, and that face Fujitora made hahaha.
Really great chapter. Here's to another 800.
That doesn't mean it's a good trope to repeat over and over. "Everybody does it" isn't a good argument for social inequality.Uh yeah Veelk it's pretty common in media aimed at younger audiences. Western media does it too except they tend to make dads into bumbling fat idiots.
Uh yeah Veelk it's pretty common in media aimed at younger audiences. Western media does it too except they tend to make dads into bumbling fat idiots.
It's basically what Oda said. He considers mothers to be the antithesis of adventure. Because all women want to do is stay home and do womanly things, apparently. It's BS.
And yeah, what Chariot said.
Oh my god not this again. Does it have to be every week?
When I make my posts, it's more of an awareness thing, to have people think critically of the work.
Nah. A lot of the time, the mothers don't even have a place in the story. Whose Chopper's mother? Whose Franky's? And besides, there are plenty of things you can do with a motherfigure that are tragic without just killing them off. Or atleast making their deaths heroic.
Aren't you the one who's basically saying that all women want to be mothers?It's basically what Oda said. He considers mothers to be the antithesis of adventure. Because all women want to do is stay home and do womanly things, apparently. It's BS.
Oh my god not this again. Does it have to be every week?