Lou Holtz on ESPN now whining about how unfair this is to everyone who didn't rape or cover-up the rape of little boys. So much stupidity spoken with a lisp.
I don't think that will be a problem. I don't think there is a rampant pedophile coverup problem going on in NCAA football, at least I would hope not. I don't believe these sanctions will do anything to stop this same thing going forward. The legal proceedings are a better deterrent, all these kinds of sanctions do is hurt current players and coaches not involved.
Yeah, picking up and moving somewhere else in the country isn't a penalty at all.
I'm able to separate the evil of Sandusky and the ego and ignorance and outright incompetence of Curley, Schulz and Paterno in handling this matter from the current staff and players and the school.
Lou Holtz on ESPN now whining about how unfair this is to everyone who didn't rape or cover-up the rape of little boys. So much stupidity spoken with a lisp.
Skip taking a stance against the NCAA sanctions? no way he'd take the contrarian view.
Except if you don't punish the school now, nothing will ever change. Feel bad for the players all you want but if the idiots leading that school would have done what was morally right none of the new people would be punished for it. That's how life works.
Well, it's true.
Typically NCAA sanctions don't ever effect those directly involved, but those who come after.
You think Reggie Bush was effected by screwing USC?
As a current Penn State, I just want to say that the NCAA made the right decision in making this harsh punishment. Never was the biggest football fan, so I don't share the same blind love that other students have for Joe Paterno.
Sorry for the dumb question but as a student who's tight on money, will this increase tuition for students by a lot?
Sirpopopop will turn his frown upside down in about an hour when Rutgers is announced as Penn State's replacement in the B1G.
ESPN said:The big question is whether the Big Ten will expel Penn State. My conversations with league sources indicate this will not happen, although the presidents considered the option. Big Ten bylaws state 70 percent of the league's presidents -- in this case, nine of 12 -- must vote for Penn State's removal to trigger expulsion.
Heavy said:I've read the last couple of pages but what's the gaf consensus on this? My jaw dropped and brows furrowed immediately when i saw those penalties, totally crippled the program for probably upwards of a decade. Well deserved and I'm happy the NCAA came down hard, much respect for Emmert.
I've read the last couple of pages but what's the gaf consensus on this? My jaw dropped and brows furrowed immediately when i saw those penalties, totally crippled the program for probably upwards of a decade. Well deserved and I'm happy the NCAA came down hard, much respect for Emmert.
No, it isn't true. The NCAA didn't punish individuals. That's not the goal. The law does that. The NCAA punishes institutions. If you're part of the institution, you benefit when they cheat/cover-up, thus you suffer when that institution is caught and punished. Lou Holtz is a moron for saying that due to the 4 or 5 people being gone that nothing should have been done.
As a current Penn State, I just want to say that the NCAA made the right decision in making this harsh punishment. Never was the biggest football fan, so I don't share the same blind love that other students have for Joe Paterno.
Sorry for the dumb question but as a student who's tight on money, will this increase tuition for students by a lot?
Man, all those children who had their lives completely ruined must be so PSYCHED to see Penn State's win/loss record changed.
Man, all those children who had their lives completely ruined must be so PSYCHED to see Penn State's win/loss record changed.
Or, you overestimated their recruiting in recent years and are trying to minimize the fact that it wasn't nearly as good as you thought.
Penn State is going to be a bad team in a few years wih an unproven coach. Whatever they were doing this year in terms of recruiting will not carry over after a few years of losing records.
Man, all those children who had their lives completely ruined must be so PSYCHED to see Penn State's win/loss record changed.
Any school could pay players and then when they get caught just fire the coach. You have to punish the school itself even if the guilty people are no longer there. In PSu's case the board is still made up of a lot of people that were there when this all went down.
It's a public university, I don't think they want any more headlines.As a current Penn State, I just want to say that the NCAA made the right decision in making this harsh punishment. Never was the biggest football fan, so I don't share the same blind love that other students have for Joe Paterno.
Sorry for the dumb question but as a student who's tight on money, will this increase tuition for students by a lot?
Man, all those children who had their lives completely ruined must be so PSYCHED to see Penn State's win/loss record changed.
Man, all those children who had their lives completely ruined must be so PSYCHED to see Penn State's win/loss record changed.
FutureFoundation said:Nope, but they're PSYCHED to see the man who raped them put in a hole for the rest of his life.
Sirpopopop will turn his frown upside down in about an hour when Rutgers is announced as Penn State's replacement in the B1G.
Football student-athletes who transfer will not have to sit out a year of competition. Any incoming or currently enrolled football student-athlete will be immediately eligible upon transfer or initial enrollment at an NCAA institution, provided they are admitted and otherwise eligible per NCAA regulations.
Penn State will release any incoming student-athletes from the National Letter of Intent.
Permission-to-contact rules will be suspended. Penn State cannot restrict in any way a student-athlete from pursuing a possible transfer. Student-athletes must simply inform Penn State of their interest in discussing transfer options with other schools. Interested schools also must inform Penn State of their intention to open discussions with the student-athlete.
Official and unofficial visit rules will be loosened. Any incoming or currently enrolled football student-athletes interested in taking an official or unofficial visit will be permitted to do so during the 2012-13 academic year, no matter how many visits they took during their recruitment. Institutions seeking to provide an official visit to a student who already visited the school as many times as NCAA legislation allows can seek relief from the NCAA on a case-by-case basis.
Additionally, the NCAA is considering waiving scholarship limits for programs to which these football student-athletes transfer, provided they reduce proportionately in the next year. For example, the limit is 25 new scholarships per year to a total of 85 scholarships. If the limits are waived in 2012-13 to accommodate one Penn State student-athlete who wishes to transfer to a particular school already at the limits, in 2013-14 the school will be limited to 24 new scholarships and 84 total scholarships.
What could they have done more for those people? They're giving $60 million to child abuse charities... sixty-million-united states-dollars. That's massive for a college football program. I guess you could say they should give some of that to the victims but I'm sure there's civil lawsuits and other things of that nature on the horizon where they'll get paid.
I think what the NCAA is doing here is rediculous. It seems more and more like they are actively trying to destroy their credibility, but that's college football for you I guess. It's the american way of winning at all costs regardless of the consequences. So I say to hell with the fbs. Any and all events that further damage the reputation of this already depicable league are a good thing.
I think what the NCAA is doing here is rediculous. It seems more and more like they are actively trying to destroy their credibility, but that's college football for you I guess. It's the american way of winning at all costs regardless of the consequences. So I say to hell with the fbs. Any and all events that further damage the reputation of this already depicable league are a good thing.
I think what the NCAA is doing here is rediculous. It seems more and more like they are actively trying to destroy their credibility, but that's college football for you I guess. It's the american way of winning at all costs regardless of the consequences. So I say to hell with the fbs. Any and all events that further damage the reputation of this already depicable league are a good thing.
I think what the NCAA is doing here is rediculous. It seems more and more like they are actively trying to destroy their credibility, but that's college football for you I guess. It's the american way of winning at all costs regardless of the consequences. So I say to hell with the fbs. Any and all events that further damage the reputation of this already depicable league are a good thing.
Legendofjoe...I think what the NCAA is doing here is rediculous. It seems more and more like they are actively trying to destroy their credibility, but that's college football for you I guess. It's the american way of winning at all costs regardless of the consequences. So I say to hell with the fbs. Any and all events that further damage the reputation of this already depicable league are a good thing.
It would be Pitt who would get in.
Rutgers always gets screwed.
It's this pessimism which makes me so certain that Penn State will bounce back strong. This instinct always supports me well in sports, and pretty much everything related to Rutgers.
Batting about a 1000 with it.
Edit: On a more serious note. The only way to take a hammer to the Penn State program is to take a hammer to their attendance. If you aren't doing that, then you aren't doing enough. The culture will recover.
ESPN doesn't want viewers supporting big penalties for schools because they want to protect the college football cash cow in the future. I swear, they are a bunch of wimps when it comes to discipline.
They had a competitive advantage by not firing/jailing/imprisoning sandusky.I think what the NCAA is doing here is rediculous. It seems more and more like they are actively trying to destroy their credibility, but that's college football for you I guess. It's the american way of winning at all costs regardless of the consequences. So I say to hell with the fbs. Any and all events that further damage the reputation of this already depicable league are a good thing.
I think what the NCAA is doing here is rediculous. It seems more and more like they are actively trying to destroy their credibility, but that's college football for you I guess. It's the american way of winning at all costs regardless of the consequences. So I say to hell with the fbs. Any and all events that further damage the reputation of this already depicable league are a good thing.
No only Lou Holtz.What's ESPN's reaction to this? From your post I'm guessing they're saying it was too harsh? pathetic
.Terry Hutchens ‏@indystar_hutch
Indiana football just went from an 0-15 record all-time against Penn State to 11-4
What's ESPN's reaction to this? From your post I'm guessing they're saying it was too harsh? pathetic
They had a competitive advantage by not firing/jailing/imprisoning sandusky.
What could they have done more for those people? They're giving $60 million to child abuse charities... sixty-million-united states-dollars. That's massive for a college football program. I guess you could say they should give some of that to the victims but I'm sure there's civil lawsuits and other things of that nature on the horizon where they'll get paid.
Their was an earlier child sex ring (before Sandusky) involving members of the legislature (and other powerful people) that was covered up, and I suspect that information got mixed up with Sandusky at some point along the line, creating that rumor.Does anyone else remember those reported rumors that Sandusky pimp young boys to Penn State donors? If that ever becomes truth, this discussion changes dramatically and I would expect more sanctions would come down.
They had a competitive advantage by not firing/jailing/imprisoning sandusky.