mre said:The Grand Jury basically found that the state had enough evidence against Sandusky to substantiate the charges against him, which allowed the process against Sandusky to go forward. It wasn't a trial and Sandusky had no right to even be present much less present a defense. Now that the Grand Jury has handed down it's indictment, Sandusky has been charged, arrested, arraigned, and released on bail (bond). His trial won't start until sometime in the middle of next year.
I wonder if this matter ever sees trial. Evidence seems to be very compelling against him, to say the least. But I cannot imagine the prosecutor(s) offering him less than 25 years or so, which would basically be a life sentence. So he may have nothing to lose and decide to go ahead with a trial. What a circus that would be.