Amibguous Cad
Member
Cyan said:"Hey Schulz. JoePa here. How's it going? Yeah, things are good over here, just finished practice, looking good on D this season I think. So hey. What happened with that Sandusky thing? Yeah, it's just he's still around kids all the time, and he still has an office here and everything, and you know, if McQueary made that whole thing up I'd really like to know."
"OMG insubordination/lawsuit! Why are you overstepping your bounds like this? Oh sweet Lord in heaven!"
I think the point is that Paterno had good reason to place his faith in the process. Bearing in mind that the internal Penn State police force had statutory authorization as municipal police departments, what reason would he have to suppose that they hadn't fully investigated the allegations? If I had reported it and he remained on campus,I would assume that the allegations were false.
Put yourself in the situation. You get a second-hand report about a crime being committed by someone you're the boss of, and you report it to the police. What else, exactly, are you supposed to do?
People are innocent until proven guilty. This is not simply a constitutionally protected right, but a moral precept. Those who would punish in their actions as a private individual for allegations that are not proven are acting immorally. It is the duty of the police department to investigate crimes and determine the veracity of allegations, and more importantly, they are far better equipped and more likely to come to a correct answer than a football coach. I would rather live in a world where football coaches are willing to turn to the people who know what they're doing in this situation than one where every individual feels responsible to be the judge of everyone who has been accused of a crime.
The real question is why the hell you authorize an internal police department with every incentive to cover up scandals like this the same legal rights as a municipal police department.