Ninja Scooter said:So he's using the "I admit I'm a creep I just didn't molest them" defense? Worked for Michael Jackson.
But he didn't make Thriller.
Ninja Scooter said:So he's using the "I admit I'm a creep I just didn't molest them" defense? Worked for Michael Jackson.
Boards of Canada said:If you saw a grown man fucking a boy from behind, you wouldn't tell the police?
Kermit The Dog said:Twaddle. Say I were to throw you a bone and believe your profession is 'understanding academic cultures', I fail to understand how an Australian university course could provide you with all the necessary requirements for you to swagger in here and gift us all a piece of your enlightened perspective.
Kermit said:It's even more perplexing to me that you speak on the subject with such confidence, considering you've never stepped foot in an American college campus and experienced college life, not even for a day.
Kermit said:Regardless, why do you believe American higher education's love affair with college sport is so distasteful?
Boards of Canada said:If you saw a grown man fucking a boy from behind, you wouldn't tell the police?
My bad. I thought he was referring to the guy that saw the act.Kermit The Dog said:Yes, but Paterno didn't see the act. He heard about it.
Let's at least get the story straight.
Yes, he did do something about it, he passed the buck and washed his hands of it. He was a coward. When accusations of child molestation/rape come up (let alone involving someone you have known for decades and currently employ), passing the buck is a chickenshit thing to do. Besides, I'm of the opinion that when all is said and done we will find out that Paterno knew more then he's claimingssolitare said:Common man he told the higher ups, it was a decision and technically, he did do something about it.
Why punish him for not telling the police, I just don't get it.
What if he told the police and he was wrong? That would have been an issue too. Hearsay and all that jazz.
Salazar said:I didn't swagger in here. I posted like everybody else. I mean that my area of scholarship is the nature and history of academic institutions. My jobs are in university teaching and in scholarly publishing. My perspective isn't tremendously enlightened, but it is not "audacious" for me to talk about academic culture.
I speak with confidence because I'm confident in my observation.
Distasteful isn't the word I would use. I think it is dysfunctional for a large proportion of an academic institution's reputation, administrative concerns, budget, interests, and ethos to be tied up in the operation of a sports franchise. I think the intensity of this dysfunction rises with the inexorable increase in scale of college sports. I think, as I stated earlier, that college sport has outgrown a legitimately controlled place in American academic institutions. Penn State is an extreme example of this dysfunction at work.
What, you mean Americans who have attended college?Kermit The Dog said:I don't know enough about the subject to retort, but I would be very interested in reading the opinions of Gaffers who have experienced this culture.
And then Sandusky kept coming around on campus and around his players and he didn't think twice about it? He deserved to fired. College coaches get fired for much less all the time.ssolitare said:Common man he told the higher ups, it was a decision and technically, he did do something about it.
Why punish him for not telling the police, I just don't get it.
What if he told the police and he was wrong? That would have been an issue too. Hearsay and all that jazz.
Kermit The Dog said:I do believe it to be audacious, because your post was quite scathing of college football culture and you used such an extreme example to underline your analysis, which I personally found clumsy.
Ninja Scooter said:And then Sandusky kept coming around on campus and around his players and he didn't think twice about it? He deserved to fired. College coaches get fired for much less all the time.
You don't know what you are talking about. Athletics are not a large portion of any schools budget, interests or administrative concerns.Salazar said:Distasteful isn't the word I would use. I think it is dysfunctional for a large proportion of an academic institution's reputation, administrative concerns, budget, interests, and ethos to be tied up in the operation of a sports franchise. I think the intensity of this dysfunction rises with the inexorable increase in scale of college sports. I think, as I stated earlier, that college sport has outgrown a legitimately controlled place in American academic institutions. Penn State is an extreme example of this dysfunction at work.
Cyan said:What, you mean Americans who have attended college?
Ew.ssolitare said:The rapist was already tired, what could he really do?
Yeah, you and the other PSU fans. I dunno.I dunno if he should have been fired.
Pretty much this. Sorry Salazar, but I can't think of a single other example of a college where athletics are even a blip on the radar. Ask who the football coach is at any other school, they won't say "JoePa! For life!", they'll give you a funny look and ask what a football is.bigtroyjon said:You don't know what you are talking about. Athletics are not a large portion of any schools budget, interests or administrative concerns.
Penn St. is not an extreme example, it is an extreme exception.
bigtroyjon said:You don't know what you are talking about. Athletics are not a large portion of any schools budget, interests or administrative concerns.
Vanderbilt spends $10 million-$15 million a year to support its athletics program -- at a cost of $2,000-$3,000 per student each year, Siegfried said.
Read more: http://journalstar.com/business/loc...115-55d3-9dca-ae790eb9d06f.html#ixzz1dsbyslY9
Cyan said:Pretty much this. Sorry Salazar, but I can't think of a single other example of a college where athletics are even a blip on the radar. Ask who the football coach is at any other school, they won't say "JoePa! For life!", they'll give you a funny look and ask what a football is.
Cyan said:Pretty much this. Sorry Salazar, but I can't think of a single other example of a college where athletics are even a blip on the radar. Ask who the football coach is at any other school, they won't say "JoePa! For life!", they'll give you a funny look and ask what a football is.
There's not much to read. College sport is big in certain universities, but the vast, vast majority of college institutions don't focus on sports at all, much less football. I'm going to hazard a guess to say Salazar has cherrypicked some stories, is applying a broad brush to the college experience in America, and chalking it up to weird Americanism.Kermit The Dog said:I don't know enough about the subject to retort, but I would be very interested in reading the opinions of Gaffers who have experienced this culture.
ssolitare said:The rapist was already tired, what could he really do? Also what if it wasn't true? Or maybe it was, I heard that Sandusky was forced to retire related related reasons.
Regardless it was a bad decision not to tell the police but, I dunno if he should have been fired. I guess we will see what the real details are.
Oh hey, I didn't realize this stuff was considered significant enough to rate a wikipedia article!mre said:According to Wikipedia our ball club is headed up by a gentleman by the name of Nick Saban who works in his capacity as a coach for free and derives his salary entirely from his work as a professor in the school of interior design.
Very weird.
Well I mean, when your hardest class is basket weaving you might be able to squeeze in a practice or two.Cyan said:Oh hey, I didn't realize this stuff was considered significant enough to rate a wikipedia article!
And my goodness, it looks like my university has cobbled together a team as well! I'm surprised those boys have enough time to play in matches, between going to classes and studying for examinations.
remnant said:There's not much to read. College sport is big in certain universities, but the vast, vast majority of college institutions don't focus on sports at all, much less football. I'm going to hazard a guess to say Salazar has cherrypicked some stories, is applying a broad brush to the college experience in America, and chalking it up to weird Americanism.
This might be the most naive statement about collegiate athletics that I have ever seen.Cyan said:Pretty much this. Sorry Salazar, but I can't think of a single other example of a college where athletics are even a blip on the radar. Ask who the football coach is at any other school, they won't say "JoePa! For life!", they'll give you a funny look and ask what a football is.
Holy crap. That is really shadyMrbob said:This is a bit curious. In July Paterno transferred ownership of home to his wife for 1 dollar?
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/16/s...ownership-of-home-to-his-wife-for-1.html?_r=1
Dude Abides said:
These seems like reasonable amounts of money to allot to an athletic club.beast786 said:
School FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 Change (2010-12)
California $69.4 $64.2 $71.2 +2.6%
Hrm. I know a little about estate planning, but from the finance/tax side rather than the law side. From the finance side, this looks like a pointless transaction.Mrbob said:This is a bit curious. In July Paterno transferred ownership of home to his wife for 1 dollar?
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/16/s...ownership-of-home-to-his-wife-for-1.html?_r=1
Look at what he's saying, though. Look at the $7 increase from last year to this year. You Californians have always liked to spend above your means.Cyan said:These seems like reasonable amounts of money to allot to an athletic club.
It looks like my alma mater gives the club about $70 a year. I suppose it goes toward shoes and uniforms for those who can't afford them on their own.Code:School FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 Change (2010-12) California $69.4 $64.2 $71.2 +2.6%
Same from the legal side. In fact, if it was done in attempt to limit his personal liability in the event of a lawsuit, it would most likely be deemed a fraudulent conveyance and ignored by the courts.Hrm. I know a little about estate planning, but from the finance/tax side rather than the law side. From the finance side, this looks like a pointless transaction.
You're right, that is a rather sharp increase. Perhaps the price of shoes has gone up? All the same, you're right--I'd rather they keep the amount steady.mre said:Look at what he's saying, though. Look at the $7 increase from last year to this year. You Californians have always liked to spend above your means.
Cyan said:These seems like reasonable amounts of money to allot to an athletic club.
Code:School FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 Change (2010-12) California $69.4 $64.2 $71.2 +2.6%
According to research by Charles Clotfelter, an economist at Duke, the average compensation for head football coaches at public universities, now more than $2 million, has grown 750 percent (adjusted for inflation) since the Regents decision in 1984; thats more than 20 times the cumulative 32 percent raise for college professors.
Officerrob said:This might be the most naive statement about collegiate athletics that I have ever seen.
Unless your trying to shield that asset from potential litigationCyan said:Hrm. I know a little about estate planning, but from the finance/tax side rather than the law side. From the finance side, this looks like a pointless transaction.
Cyan said:These seems like reasonable amounts of money to allot to an athletic club.
It looks like my alma mater gives the club about $70 a year. I suppose it goes toward shoes and uniforms for those who can't afford them on their own.Code:School FY2010 FY2011 FY2012 Change (2010-12) California $69.4 $64.2 $71.2 +2.6%
It If that was his intent, and there is evidence that shows he knew of some pending litigation, then the conveyance would likely be treated as fraudulent and ignored.Officerrob said:Unless your trying to shield that asset from potential litigation
Cyan said:Oh hey, I didn't realize this stuff was considered significant enough to rate a wikipedia article!
And my goodness, it looks like my old university has cobbled together a team as well! I'm surprised those boys have enough time to play in matches, between going to class and studying for examinations.
You realize that the universities themselves do not actually pay that amount, right?Salazar said:750 percent. Fuck yeah.
aorange999 said:Cyan seriously now...I'm not on Salazars side
mre said:You realize that the universities themselves do not actually pay that amount, right?
That amount seems to be working for 'Bama over the last few years.mre said:You realize that the universities themselves do not actually pay that amount, right?
DMczaf said:But he didn't make Thriller.
I disagree with you 100%.
First sport culture. You think people are not attach to football or have no idea who the coach is in the crazy SEC conferences, do you think the 100,000 plus fans in stadiums that are packed through out USA have no idea about football. Same with basket ball in ACC.
Athletics is a huge budget, including scholarships for every starter and many bench players. Head coaches get paid more than any professor in big /medium Football schools, add travel expense for all your football players, work out facility etc etc.
you are extremely naive to think PSU is an exception
http://m.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Jou...h/Budgets.aspx
Every DIV school is effected by athletic department
http://www.annarbor.com/sports/budge...ic-department/
Pull the other one. What, is this a polo club featuring Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller, and the Astors?beast786 said:you do realize that it's 71.2 million right?
there is a big difference between stealing and child molestationssolitare said:Common man he told the higher ups, it was a decision and technically, he did do something about it.
Why punish him for not telling the police, I just don't get it.
What if he told the police and he was wrong? That would have been an issue too. Hearsay and all that jazz.
Maybe, but it's disingenuous to compare the salaries of professors and head football coaches at major universities. The vast bulk of the coach's salary is paid out of donations by athletic boosters, compensation for participating in programs like a coach's call in show, and from guaranteed endorsement contracts secured by the university but paid by the sponsoring corporation. The actual "salary" of most coaches (at least at public universities) is probably not that far from the salary of a tenured professor.Salazar said:Yeah. It is stupendous, nevertheless.
dschalter said:for all i know that piss could have been digital.
first, at the places where football is big, the football program (if not the athletics department as a whole, especially women's sports) often makes a profit. i do agree that small colleges trying to gain status by throwing money at a football program is stupid.
second, and more importantly, the idea of athletics dominating academics is a groundless one that is propagated by people who like to moralize. even at schools where football is huge (a very small minority), it's not like students are spending all their free hours watching the team practice and play and not doing any work because of it.
To quote the coach from the greatest college football movie of all time, The Program,mre said:Maybe, but it's disingenuous to compare the salaries of professors and head football coaches at major universities. The vast bulk of the coach's salary is paid out of donations by athletic boosters, compensation for participating in programs like a coach's call in show, and from guaranteed endorsement contracts secured by the university but paid by the sponsoring corporation. The actual "salary" of most coaches (at least at public universities) is probably not that far from the salary of a tenured professor.
It's late and I'm feeling too lazy and tired to look up actual numbers, but, if I remember correctly, Nick Saban's total compensation is something like $4.5m, but is only paid less than $200k out of public funds by the University of Alabama.
Regent Chairman: This is not a football vocational school. It's an institute for higher learning.
Coach Winters: Yeah, but when was the last time 80,000 people showed up to watch a kid do a damn chemistry experiment? Why don't you stick the bow-tie up your ass?
dschalter said:first, at the places where football is big, the football program (if not the athletics department as a whole, especially women's sports) often makes a profit. i do agree that small colleges trying to gain status by throwing money at a football program is stupid.
dschalter said:second, and more importantly, the idea of athletics dominating academics is a groundless one that is propagated by people who like to moralize. even at schools where football is huge (a very small minority), it's not like students are spending all their free hours watching the team practice and play and not doing any work because of it.
Cyan said:Pull the other one. What, is this a polo club featuring Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller, and the Astors?
Have you ever been to a big time college football game? Go to Auburn-Alabama, Texas-Texas A&M...Salazar said:Only 22 of 120 Division I-A university college athletics programs ran surpluses in 2009-2010. Probably the big ones.
I grant that I am, at least in part, making a moral argument. I'm not arguing for a caricature of nobody studying, or of everybody studying less, because there is a big football game on or a large football program on campus.