Considering the love and hate expressed for Lava, it was kind of surreal to go hang out with some friends tonight (some of them Hawaiians) who dance hula and play ukulele...and who were practicing the Lava song without having seen the rest of the movie.
my issue is that it reminds me too much of the ukulele version of Somewhere over the Rainbow.
Why didn't or couldn't Joy send the core memories back up for recall like those downstairs workers continually sent up the annoying jingle memory?
Lava resonated more emotionally with me than Inside Out did, but it's a competent Pixar film all the same.
Mid tier, 7/10.
Why didn't or couldn't Joy send the core memories back up for recall like those downstairs workers continually sent up the annoying jingle memory?
I may be mistaken, but I think it's a super common strumming pattern for Hawaiian music, so the rhythm sounds similar.my issue is that it reminds me too much of the ukulele version of Somewhere over the Rainbow.
A friend pointed this out in the theater too. The only explanation I've seen suggested was thatMy girlfriend said this immediately, there really was no reason.
Lava resonated more emotionally with me than Inside Out did, but it's a competent Pixar film all the same.
Mid tier, 7/10.
Lava resonated more emotionally with me than Inside Out did, but it's a competent Pixar film all the same.
Mid tier, 7/10.
Why didn't or couldn't Joy send the core memories back up for recall like those downstairs workers continually sent up the annoying jingle memory?
1. It's not up to Joy what memories are recalled this way. It's up to those two workers who can send memories up willy-nilly. Notice how despite Joy's objections at the memories they were purging, she didn't try to stop them.
2. Even if she did send them, that wouldn't have made a difference. The whole plot arc is the fact that Sadness is the only appropriate emotion for Riley to process what she's going through, but childish Joy is what has been coasting her through life all this time. Joy, Anger, Disgust, and Fear weren't the appropriate emotional responses (which is why none of them could undo the "idea bulb"). Sadness, for once in Riley's life, needed to be the one to take her through an important core memory. Without her Riley would've remained emotionally confused.
edit: to expand on this, during Riley's depressed/blank/confused period, she was trying to find happiness or the "bright side" of her move, suppressing her sad feelings. Metaphorically, Joy assumes responsibility for being "the one to fix it" because up until that point childish glee had been running the whole show. She goes off on a trek to headquarters looking for a way back in the same way Riley's been looking for happiness to get her through this tough time. The ending says that no, generic happiness doesn't solve every emotional problem. Sometimes you just need sadness to take over to properly process what's going on. It was first hinted at when bing bong was sad and Sadness talked to him. At first Joy was like "oh god she'll ruin everything", because Joy had a very childish understanding that "sad=bad", but when bing bong talked it through and felt better, it showed for the first time that maybe she isn't the answer to everything ever.
I didn't think he wouldyou should probably spoiler that. but i thought he would be with the whole shortcut thing.
Yes, great post.Great post. I saw it on Friday and absolutely loved it.
Lava resonated more emotionally with me than Inside Out did, but it's a competent Pixar film all the same.
Mid tier, 7/10.
Why didn't or couldn't Joy send the core memories back up for recall like those downstairs workers continually sent up the annoying jingle memory?
I fucking loved this movie so fucking much.
Two things that I think probably contributed to my enjoying it as much as I did:
1. I'm a parent
2. I'm a writer
To that second point: When I originally heard about the concept for this movie it sounded like a nightmare scenario. Writing a movie about emotions that evokes real emotions in its audience while also being funny and entertaining for audiences of all ages-- no thanks; I can't think of a way to do that without a disastrous outcome.
I read Ed Catmull's book and it touches on the insane difficulty that Pete Docter had putting this story together in a workable fashion. What I just watched, though, did everything it set out to do and made it look easy. I'm absolutely awestruck by how well-written this movie is, to say nothing of the visuals.
About Sadness:I am a little annoyed that they didn't explain why Sadness basically permanently polluted all the joyful memories she touched. Not sure if that was a commentary on the fact that sadness can literally pollute our memories, or what.
About Sadness:
I think someone suggested that as one grows older, sadness and nostalgia color memories of certain things because you are viewing them from a distant vantage point. They are no longer as simple as they once were.
Of course, maybe it would make more sense for them to be multicolored then, instead of completely blue.
Of course, maybe it would make more sense for them to be multicolored then, instead of completely blue.
We had 3, 4 and 5yo boys with us and they all seemed to like it. The 3yo was locked in throughout. But I know mileage can vary. This good run was particularly rare for my kids, haha.With all this about it being sad etc, Would this be good for a almost 5 year old boy? Last thing we need is him coming out of a movie crying. Or is it something that only the adults will catch onto the sadness? If you guys know what I'm saying.
Hmm, yeahit would have made more sense in that case to make multi-colored orbs.
Anyway, I also remember thinking to myself "why the hell is Joy crying?" I mean I know Joy was crying because she was very sad, but that was a moment in which I think Pixar's storytelling with the emotions fell inconsistent. It makes zero sense for Joy (which, in some definitions, means happiness DESPITE circumstances) to be bawling her eyes out and feeling despair. It contradicts the emotion that she is. And they just kind of let it happen and then she gets over it and everyone acts like nothing happened. It was pretty weird to me.
With all this about it being sad etc, Would this be good for a almost 5 year old boy? Last thing we need is him coming out of a movie crying. Or is it something that only the adults will catch onto the sadness? If you guys know what I'm saying.
1. It's not up to Joy what memories are recalled this way. It's up to those two workers who can send memories up willy-nilly. Notice how despite Joy's objections at the memories they were purging, she didn't try to stop them.
2. Even if she did send them, that wouldn't have made a difference. The whole plot arc is the fact that Sadness is the only appropriate emotion for Riley to process what she's going through, but childish Joy is what has been coasting her through life all this time. Joy, Anger, Disgust, and Fear weren't the appropriate emotional responses (which is why none of them could undo the "idea bulb"). Sadness, for once in Riley's life, needed to be the one to take her through an important core memory. Without her Riley would've remained emotionally confused.
edit: to expand on this, during Riley's depressed/blank/confused period, she was trying to find happiness or the "bright side" of her move, suppressing her sad feelings. Metaphorically, Joy assumes responsibility for being "the one to fix it" because up until that point childish glee had been running the whole show. She goes off on a trek to headquarters looking for a way back in the same way Riley's been looking for happiness to get her through this tough time. The ending says that no, generic happiness doesn't solve every emotional problem. Sometimes you just need sadness to take over to properly process what's going on. It was first hinted at when bing bong was sad and Sadness talked to him. At first Joy was like "oh god she'll ruin everything", because Joy had a very childish understanding that "sad=bad", but when bing bong talked it through and felt better, it showed for the first time that maybe she isn't the answer to everything ever.
A friend pointed this out in the theater too. The only explanation I've seen suggested was that.Joy was afraid the other emotions would screw up the core memories or something like sadness did, if Joy wasn't personally handling them
Ehhh, it was pretty good and an improvement over the other recent PIXAR offerings, but it’s not top tier.
The PIXAR curse of the first 10 or so minutes being amazing and the middle being ok continues. 7.5/10
A friend pointed this out in the theater too. The only explanation I've seen suggested was that.Joy was afraid the other emotions would screw up the core memories or something like sadness did, if Joy wasn't personally handling them
This was a safe, cheap, emotionally manipulative movie. The more I think about it, the more pissed off I am. Great clever premise. Ambitious theme. Horrible execution by taking many shortcuts. Mediocre.
Yes, this movie is about a yellowgirl'swoman's adventure to get back into a big tower. It's also(doh a movie can be about more than one thing). finally it's also about a girl coming to terms with her family moving to a new city. The problem is none of these strands are combined well together. In particular Joy & Sadness adventure was just a waste. for examplea moral about how sadness is essential and thatlosingjoy and wonder is an integral part of growing up
Seriously.Best Pixar movie in years.
I put it up with the Toy Story trilogy.
Seriously, I felt things about an animated movie I had never felt before...
Joy's journey (& Sadness) back to the tower was not a representation of Riley suppressing her emotions. You're confusing cause and effect here. Their absence was what caused Riley to behave as she did. Nothing during Joy's journey through the mind represented/reflected/affected what Riley was going through (apart from the nightmare). Did Joy/Sadness almost destruction in the abstraction chamber affect Riley? Nope. Did Joy's multiple attempts to power the Bing bong's broom back up to long term library connect back Riley? Nope. Joy's journey was a scenic showoff for the animation team to display ideas about the brain...
It was shoehorned that Sadness was polluting memories in the library. Joy and the other emotions expressed surprised that Sadness was able to change the core memories and Joy couldn't turn them back. It was never really explained why Sadness was able to change those memories and then why she was also able to change random long term memories that led Joy back to her.
I'm not sure what you mean by that. Riley's literal story is fine. If we didn't see inside her head it would be a simple story but serviceable. But Riley's story isn't the main one, Joy's is. Joy's story is supposed to be what's driving Riley's a that metaphor is poorly done.
I think I'm seeing a pattern in people's enjoyment of the film based on how whether or not they're interpreting it literally or metaphorically. For example, when Riley flubs her hockey tryout, does it occur because her memory balls went down a tube, or because she's a scared little girl in a new place who's emotions are ruled by fear, and anger? I think the film resonates more with those interpreting the film along the latter.
Yeah, really. This is rileys story and the people inside her head are just there to describe it.
Actually, according to the art director, Riley is "the set" while Joy and Sadness are the main protagonists, you're right that it's a metaphor tho.Yeah, really. This is rileys story and the people inside her head are just there to describe it.
Actually, according to the art director, Riley is "the set" while Joy and Sadness are the main protagonists, you're right that it's a metaphor tho.
It's both, it's not just one or the other.