You did not test the tv until now??? The fuck.I bought a Panny VT60 late last year when they announced they wouldn't sell them anymore, even though my basement wasn't developed yet.
Well, last night we finally finished and got the TV out of the box. I was saddened to see the TV wasn't facing the right way in the box (front was facing the wrong way) and the instruction manuals had already been opened.
I hope I didn't get someone's returned lemon. Wiring being done today so I'll know pretty quickly.
Does the set work, at least?I bought a Panny VT60 late last year when they announced they wouldn't sell them anymore, even though my basement wasn't developed yet.
Well, last night we finally finished and got the TV out of the box. I was saddened to see the TV wasn't facing the right way in the box (front was facing the wrong way) and the instruction manuals had already been opened.
I hope I didn't get someone's returned lemon. Wiring being done today so I'll know pretty quickly.
eh.
i can't decide whether the superior PQ is worth the weight, hassle, power consumption, image retention (that everyone keeps saying hasn't been an issue for the last 10 years, except i keep seeing people pop up and claim they have some logo stuck in the middle of their screenok, so maybe it's not permanent and can be erased but still).
Now that sony in particular seems to have a not so great 3D mode (limited resolution and color depth in 3D), which bothers me quite a lot..
That triluminos IQ!
![]()
KDL55W900AWhat set is that
KDL55W900A
You likey? I'm thinking of getting a 40" W series for bedroom. How are the blacks, shadow detail ?
like I said a little earlier, I find the picture quality better then my OLD ( 5 years) Pioneer Kuro 5020FD. But the 2014 W series is shit compared to the 2013 model, if you want quality you will have to go 4k this round.
Yes. Sad for buyers who still want a quality 1080p TVReally? Ugh.. I did not know that. So a comparable 2014 Sony LCD this year has to be 4k?
hdtvtest said:Theres just no sugarcoating this: the KDL-55W955B is the worst-performing Sony Bravia flagship HDTV weve reviewed in terms of picture quality.
Went to Best Buy the other day and saw the new 4k OLEDs and I refuse to buy anything else. They blow everything out of the water. Once they hit around a 5k price point I will be all over it.
eh.
i can't decide whether the superior PQ is worth the weight, hassle, power consumption, image retention (that everyone keeps saying hasn't been an issue for the last 10 years, except i keep seeing people pop up and claim they have some logo stuck in the middle of their screenok, so maybe it's not permanent and can be erased but still).
Now that sony in particular seems to have a not so great 3D mode (limited resolution and color depth in 3D), which bothers me quite a lot..
I don't care about 3D enough to give a damn
Me neither, although 3d gaming...btw is there any 3d next gen game available yet ?
But it still bothers me
I'm in the market for a new TV and having trouble deciding what is best for my price range! I'm looking to spend between 700-1000 and looking at a 46+ inch range. I don't care about 3d, smart features are not really a worry either. I'm using it for a moderate amount of gaming and watching cable, Netflix, and such. It will sit in a fairly bright room. Any suggestions?
Panasonics website is now taking orders for the new 58" 4k set which features a Display Port 1.2a which would allow 4k gaming at 60fps. I just went to Best Buy and they also show the 58" available for order in addition to the 65". Still no word on when the flag ship AX9000 that is rumored to beat black levels of Plasma's.
I am really tempted to try out the 65" AX8000. I loved last years 4k set and thought out of all the 4k TV's that it looked the best for Movies/Cable and what I was looking for "Gaming". But it suffered horrid vertical banding issues and almost anyone that bought one also saw these vertical bars. But since Panasonic is the only game in town that offers Display Port on their sets, it makes me want to give them one more try and get the AX8000. Just have to convince the Wife! lol
Panasonics website is now taking orders for the new 58" 4k set which features a Display Port 1.2a which would allow 4k gaming at 60fps.
Just wanted to say that I got a Pioneer Kuro 55'' a year ago today for $600 and do not regret it one bit. The only drawback is the large amount of power it sucks. Other than that, it is truly a fantastic TV for movies.
I tested a bunch of 360 games on the Samsung HU9000 at Paul's TV today. I wish it was my PC... But man it looked amazing. No problems with input lag.
The hu9000 have large measureable input lag fyi. Its in the 90ms range according to reviews. Its also undefeatable in game mode.
Yeah, sat in the box in our kitchen until we got the basement done. It was far more work than ever expected it to be, lol.You did not test the tv until now??? The fuck.
I'm looking to replace my bedroom tv with something in the ~40" range, but just can't bring myself to cheap out and have crap blacks. Are there any tvs in that size range that have good picture quality?
the 955A is a version of the W900. It has better IQ than the F8000 in nearly every regard, color, motion clarity, blacks...Samsung UN55F8000 VS Sony 55W955A?
i heard that the IQ on the F8000 is better, but the W955A has better input lag (17ms) vs the 50ms from the F8000?
http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/kdl55w955b-201403103661.htm
http://reviews9.net/samsung-un55f8000-reviews/
the 955A is a version of the W900. It has better IQ than the F8000 in nearly every regard, color, motion clarity, blacks...
oops, my badNo the W955 is the 2014 model which is shit.
You are thinking of the W950.
Just ordered a 60 inch Vizio M series tv from Amazon! $1298 was an awesome price and I can't wait to get it hanging on my wall! Anyone else gaming on this tv?
I finally decide to get the 55" W905A over the 55" VT60, seeing how the later is 500 EUR more around here. Of course I then find the VT60 for roughly the same price. Aaaand I'm in decision hell again.
HELP.
I finally decide to get the 55" W905A over the 55" VT60, seeing how the later is 500 EUR more around here. Of course I then find the VT60 for roughly the same price. Aaaand I'm in decision hell again.
HELP.
I finally decide to get the 55" W905A over the 55" VT60, seeing how the later is 500 EUR more around here. Of course I then find the VT60 for roughly the same price. Aaaand I'm in decision hell again.
HELP.
after a few weeks with my st50 55 inch, I'm very happy with it. I can believe the hype now that panny plasmas have a great pic as I'm coming from a sammy led for the past 4+ years. Sammy's pic is still amazing but that tv was also 3k and I got this one used for 500 although even new it's still much cheaper. Warning though - the tv DEF HAS image retention. No question about it so for those that are wondering and people here saying it doesn't exist, I can guarantee it does and I suspect those who say it doesn't can't see it (i'm a hawk for image retention).
Example of this - watching movies, playing games I can't pick it up but if you put a still image of color, certain shades will show it. Yes it will go away but it's a pain and really unbelievable that something like this exists nowadays. While watching tv, depending on what it is, I can also pick it up here and there but nothing major.
For gaming the 905A is usually in a league of its own with the input lag....
Don't know about the VT60
Sacrificing competition-grade input lag is a fair trade-off I think when it comes to Panny Plasma image quality. I can't notice the lag on my 2010 set at least.