PlayStation exclusive content for Hogwarts Legacy will run for 1 year

Pretty sure that Hogwarts Legacy in the first year will have many mods on the PC that will turn this exclusive content irrelevant.
 
Last edited:
Port Exclusive 1st party games, then continues to pay 3rd party games for time Exclusive.
Fucking stupid logic.
Feel like don't wanna buy games on Playstation anymore.
 
6tpn0a.jpg
 
Here's a list of various 3rd-party deals MS got. Some very high-profile series there. Poor Sony.

Dead Rising
Last Remnant
Infinite Undiscovery
Star Ocean The Last Hope
GTA DLC
Dino Crisis 3
COD DLC
Morrowind and Oblivion
Ninja Gaiden
ACE COMBAT 6
Tales Of Vesperia
Tomb Raider
Bioshock
Splinter Cell
Mass Effect and Jade Empire
Dead or Alive 3 and 4
Titanfall
The Medium
Stalker 2
Wartide
PUBG
NARAKA

You forgot Fifa Ultimate Team. They got the Legends card, which were asked for from the community for years. Was available on on Xbox from Fifa 14 to Fifa 17.
 
You mean like Nintendo with Bayonetta, like Sony with final fantasy and street fighter and like Xbox with the next Bethesda game? But only one of those companies is being a bitch about it.
Microsoft owns Bethesda and Nintendo paid for Bayonetta's development this is not on the same scale at all. Any game in this category would not exist without the platform owner's investment. They are not mere marketing deals like this Harry Potter case.

It is super petty and really I don't see why people care about this DLC content itself. The game should be big enough that most players miss a few small side quests like this. So this makes the whole thing annoying and pathetic, which is something I agree deserves to be called out for how lame it is, not for how shitty to gamers it is.

PC version is 60 bucks, PS5 version is 70 bucks. I think my choice is made.
 
I'm really surprised that Sony and Microsoft more often don't just contact these companies while they make the game and just pay them to make exclusive content. That seems like the easier and cheaper form of exclusivity. I think Soul Calibur did something similar with exclusive characters for each platform. Like I'm sure Sony was aware that Capcom was making a new street fighter game. They could be like hey can we pay you to make a playstation themed stage or even pay them to add another character to the new street fighter.
 
This is the worst kind of exclusivity as it is pointless and purely meant to be punitive to those who game outside of the PlayStation ecosystem. This is taking away content from gamers as a punishment for not playing where they want you. That is a fact that would be very hard to dispute.

That's the furthest reach I've heard yet. Expansions not coming to your console for a year, that's fine, whole game not coming to your platform for a year due to exclusivity, that's fine, whole franchise no longer coming to your platform indefinitely just because, that's fine. No, it's some random cosmetics and a quest that's the worst evil. Honestly do you even hear yourselves sometimes?
 
I'm really surprised that Sony and Microsoft more often don't just contact these companies while they make the game and just pay them to make exclusive content. That seems like the easier and cheaper form of exclusivity. I think Soul Calibur did something similar with exclusive characters for each platform. Like I'm sure Sony was aware that Capcom was making a new street fighter game. They could be like hey can we pay you to make a playstation themed stage or even pay them to add another character to the new street fighter.
This is essentially what this is. However people argue and it's hard to prove whether the publisher created additional free content for one platform paid for by the platform holder or cut content from the others.

The point of these content exclusives are the platform holders competing for game sales of multiplatforms. If however each paid for additional content then it dilutes its effect and the platform holders are less likely to do it. People seem to have convinced themselves that MS and Phil don't do these things because it's evil but the truth of the matter is that they did it up until the point where game sales were no longer the driving force of their business, after gamepass in late 2017. Now they are trying to secure exclusives indefinitely to drive subscriptions and get you to pay for your cosmetics. It doesn't make sense to pay a publisher to make content to compete for game sales. It makes sense to make franchises exclusive to attract people to gamepass.
 
Last edited:
You mean like Nintendo with Bayonetta, like Sony with final fantasy and street fighter and like Xbox with the next Bethesda game? But only one of those companies is being a bitch about it.
"I don't know what deals get written. I've been pretty open about, I'm not a fan of doing deals that hold back specific pieces of content from other platforms. You don't see that in the deals we've done with Assassin's and Shadow. We'll have a marketing deal on those, but I don't say, hey, I need some kind of Strike or skin somebody else can't play.

"I don't think it's good for our industry if we got into a point where people are holding back the technical innovation of game developers based on a marketing deal. I don't know anything about what's in other people's deals."

I'll let you guess who was bitching here.
 
Sony doesn't make any huge purchases like Bethesda or AB, but if they had the money to make them, they sure as fuck would.

But it's just as bad when Sony buys bits and pieces of loads of other games.
 
The game will receive marketing.
I like how everyone wants to believe that this means something other than paying to keep content exclusive in order to give one platform a competitive advantage over the others.

It's very well established that people who believe this are in favor of the paid exclusivity model that has been the norm for decades. Limiting what goes to other platforms is perfectly fine. For them it really only comes down to who is paying for it and what platform it goes to.
 
blows me away how much people care about a fucking harry potter game. harry fucking potter. YGTBSM.

i'm definitely way too old for this shit anymore.
 
Last edited:
One mission vs 70 billion dollars worth of exclusive content.

But arrogant Sony is back.
I think it's more about the hypocrisy than anything.

Also, why does Sony get to make the rules of acceptable purchases? I am 1000% convinced that if Sony had the funds to buy a company like Bethesda or Activision it would have been done yesterday. We wouldn't be talking about exclusivity, the answer would have been known.
 
I think it's more about the hypocrisy than anything.

Also, why does Sony get to make the rules of acceptable purchases? I am 1000% convinced that if Sony had the funds to buy a company like Bethesda or Activision it would have been done yesterday. We wouldn't be talking about exclusivity, the answer would have been known.

Sony don't make any rules. The FCC, CMA etc do. It's because one is constant merger and aquisition of smaller companies into one megacorp and the other isn't.

Sony even though they could afford it wasn't buying up Ninja theory to make a sequel exclusive. The difference is only strategy and their ideology of the market and sales being completely different to MS' strategy and ideology.
 
They have a marketing deal with the game so why are grown men butthurt over some content being exclusive? This sense of entitlement, like certain content or games not coming to your system is a violation of your civil rights or something, is just childish.

And yes that could apply to Jim Ryan too over the COD statements but at least he's a businessman and says what he says for obvious strategic reasons. These randoms crying on Twitter over this stuff are just being manchildren.
Love how Jimmy boy gets a pass from you. But then we have whiners going on about the ABK deal. The gaul to even bring up "entitlement". Wow!
 
Sony don't make any rules. The FCC, CMA etc do. It's because one is constant merger and aquisition of smaller companies into one megacorp and the other isn't.

Sony even though they could afford it wasn't buying up Ninja theory to make a sequel exclusive. The difference is only strategy and their ideology of the market and sales being completely different to MS' strategy and ideology.
There is no difference. One company can afford to go much bigger on acquisitions than the other. And the other is upset about it because it hurts their bottom line.
 
I like how everyone wants to believe that this means something other than paying to keep content exclusive in order to give one platform a competitive advantage over the others.

It's very well established that people who believe this are in favor of the paid exclusivity model that has been the norm for decades. Limiting what goes to other platforms is perfectly fine. For them it really only comes down to who is paying for it and what platform it goes to.
I'm not in favour of any platform missing out on content.
My post was purely explaining what each party gets for their 'investment'.
 
There is no difference. One company can afford to go much bigger on acquisitions than the other. And the other is upset about it because it hurts their bottom line.
Difference in strategy? there is a massive one. Sony could very easily have bought small developers like Ninja Theory, Obsidian etc. It isn't about not affording it. The difference was that they didn't need to convince third parties to not sell games anymore and so didn't need to make them first party at all at the time.
 
Last edited:
I think it's more about the hypocrisy than anything.

Also, why does Sony get to make the rules of acceptable purchases? I am 1000% convinced that if Sony had the funds to buy a company like Bethesda or Activision it would have been done yesterday. We wouldn't be talking about exclusivity, the answer would have been known.
They were trying to get Starfield exclusive. But of course thatwasdifferent.gif
 
They're getting aggressive with pursuing longer deals for what amounts to mostly trivial, non-essential, content, seems like a bit of desperation creeping in.
But it's nothing.
Both userbases gets the game and one as access to extra content before the other.
Both have it in the end.
No big deal.
I understand it's annoying if you're excited for that particular piece of content but it's usually nothing burger anyway.
It's not like the Tomb Raider Underworld deal where one platform has 2 chunks of missing content indefinitely.
Don't like it, vote with your wallet and buy the game cheap when the DLC is available.
 
That's the problem. It only goes one way.

Microsoft = big bad corporation only wanting your money.
Sony = saviors of gaming.
How so, I'm not sure I've seen anyone call sony a saviour, they both just want your money. If anything it's the xbox loose cannons who are trying to frame multiple aquisitions of publishers by a big corporation as some kind of 'saviour' to tyranny. The same tyranny that MS does/did anyway. have you seen the Phil jesus/god memes? I think you have the one way mixed up.
 
Last edited:
You forgot Fifa Ultimate Team. They got the Legends card, which were asked for from the community for years. Was available on on Xbox from Fifa 14 to Fifa 17.
Thank you I'm going to add it. We have to copy/paste that list anytime they cry about something 😅

They are so quiet about these deals like MS was innocent all along.


It's not like the Tomb Raider Underworld deal where one platform has 2 chunks of missing content indefinitely.
Thank you I added it to the list. Damn it's getting long. How did PS survive all this damage from MS?

Dead Rising
Last Remnant
Infinite Undiscovery
Star Ocean The Last Hope
GTA DLC
Dino Crisis 3
COD DLC
Morrowind and Oblivion
Ninja Gaiden
ACE COMBAT 6
Tales Of Vesperia
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Tomb Raider Underworld DLC
Bioshock
Splinter Cell
Splinter Cell Conviction
Ghost Recon
The Division DLC
Mass Effect and Jade Empire
Dead or Alive 3 and 4
Titanfall
Guilty Gear 2
Plants vs. Zombies: Garden Warfare
The Medium
Stalker 2
Wartide
PUBG
NARAKA
FiFA Legends DLC
Rainbow Six Vegas
Ridge Racer 6
Lost Planet
Alone in the Dark
Eternal Sonata
 
Last edited:
That's the furthest reach I've heard yet. Expansions not coming to your console for a year, that's fine, whole game not coming to your platform for a year due to exclusivity, that's fine, whole franchise no longer coming to your platform indefinitely just because, that's fine. No, it's some random cosmetics and a quest that's the worst evil. Honestly do you even hear yourselves sometimes?
They don't because they are never ending trolls. Some of them are to thick to even put an argument forward so rely solely on reactions.
 
Last edited:
Dead Rising
Last Remnant
Infinite Undiscovery
Star Ocean The Last Hope
GTA DLC
Dino Crisis 3
COD DLC
Morrowind and Oblivion
Ninja Gaiden
ACE COMBAT 6
Tales Of Vesperia
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Tomb Raider Underworld DLC
Bioshock
Splinter Cell
Mass Effect and Jade Empire
Splinter Cell Conviction
Rainbow Six Vegas
Dead or Alive 3 and 4
Titanfall
The Medium
Stalker 2
Wartide
PUBG
NARAKA
FiFA Legends DLC

That's it ? That isn't even 1% of the deals Sony makes lol
 
Thank you I'm going to add it. We have to copy/paste that list anytime they cry about something 😅

They are so quiet about these deals like MS was innocent all along.



Thank you I added it to the list. Damn it's getting long. How did PS survive all this damage from MS?

Dead Rising
Last Remnant
Infinite Undiscovery
Star Ocean The Last Hope
GTA DLC
Dino Crisis 3
COD DLC
Morrowind and Oblivion
Ninja Gaiden
ACE COMBAT 6
Tales Of Vesperia
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Tomb Raider Underworld DLC
Bioshock
Splinter Cell
Mass Effect and Jade Empire
Dead or Alive 3 and 4
Titanfall
The Medium
Stalker 2
Wartide
PUBG
NARAKA
FiFA Legends DLC
Oh you doing a list 😅
Might as well throw them on
Ridge Racer 6
Lost Planet
Alone in the Dark

Oh and Final Fantasy XIII Remastered technically 😅
 
Beggars can't be choosers.
I mean some of those IP's actually died on that hill.
But yeah it's nothing compared to the PS2 era

Not even PS2. Entire franchises like FF, RE, Silent Hill and tons of both Western and Japanese IP were locked to the PS1 and PS2 for any number of reasons.

Trying to make a list of things Xbox has money-hatted compared to what Sony have done over the last 26 years is a little foolish lol

I love that CoD DLC is being counted as something Xbox did way back when, when for almost a decade now PS consoles have had exclusive DLC/modes/character packs. This is maximum reach lol.
 
Last edited:
How so, I'm not sure I've seen anyone call sony a saviour, they both just want your money. If anything it's the xbox loose cannons who are trying to frame multiple aquisitions of publishers by a big corporation as some kind of 'saviour' to tyranny. The same tyranny that MS does/did anyway. have you seen the Phil jesus/god memes? I think you have the one way mixed up.
They both want your money but it's nice when one company has an extensive backward compatibility program, gives free upgrades to next generation games, offers free cloud saves, and doesn't raise their console prices in the middle of a massive recessionary period.

You are free to complain about any platform you wish but there is a reason people like MS' vision for gaming. Using your massive finances to make gaming more affordable and a better value for the consumer matters quite a bit. It'd be nice to see all platforms treat their customers with that sort of 'tyranny'.
 
Not even PS2. Entire franchises like FF, RE, Silent Hill and tons of both Western and Japanese IP were locked to the PS1 and PS2 for any number of reasons.

Trying to make a list of things Xbox has money-hatted compared to what Sony have done over the last 26 years is a little foolish lol
RE is a tricky one because all of them have appeared on other consoles
Saturn had RE1
N64 had RE2 &3
Dreamcast I believe had RE2/3 & Code Veronica
GameCube had all of them bar the original RE.
the games were more exclusive because PSX was the only viable console at the time.
FF was due to their relationship after the publishing deal for FFVII.
A lot of exclusives was publishing deals because Sony didn't have their first party support they do now.
But yeah generally agree, Sony Exclusives>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>MS Exclusives
 
Not even PS2. Entire franchises like FF, RE, Silent Hill and tons of both Western and Japanese IP were locked to the PS1 and PS2 for any number of reasons.
Those were not even moneyhats. You think publishers had to go back and make Xbox versions of all their games because MS decided to launch a new console 🙄

Silent Hill Homecoming/Downpour and the next games on those series came out on Xbox. Sony was not blocking them.
 
Those were not even moneyhats. You think publishers had to go back and make Xbox versions of all their games because MS decided to launch a new console 🙄

Silent Hill Homecoming/Downpour and the next games on those series came out on Xbox. Sony was not blocking them.

Whose specifically only talking about Xbox ?

Saturn versions of Tomb Raider 2, RE2 and others were canceled way back in the day before Xbox was even a thing.

This is not a list war anyone wants to take, it'll become really long :messenger_grinning_sweat:

I'll leave you to that, for this topic about Hogwarts, since the game is coming on like 6 platforms, by its nature the content they're making exclusive cannot be essential so it's not a big loss for players on PC/Xbox/Switch here.
 
Last edited:
They both want your money but it's nice when one company has an extensive backward compatibility program, gives free upgrades to next generation games, offers free cloud saves, and doesn't raise their console prices in the middle of a massive recessionary period.

You are free to complain about any platform you wish but there is a reason people like MS' vision for gaming. Using your massive finances to make gaming more affordable and a better value for the consumer matters quite a bit. It'd be nice to see all platforms treat their customers with that sort of 'tyranny'.

I mean this is a pretty left field tangent considering what's being discussed is exclusivity deals. I don't think you realise how obvious your love for xbox is, even during the xbox one you were here defending MS with no second hand sales, always online etc and now you're pretending this is about who's 'anticonsoomer'? You and catlady going around with those tags giving empathy reactions.

Nobody asked for a pros and cons list. Could you imagine how laughable it would be listing a VR program, no requirement for PS+, cheaper non proprietary storage during a recession and saying that's why people love Sony when trying to make false equivalences in exclusivity? That's how you come across most of the time. You're obviously deflecting from the fact that I'm making fun of those who don't see that MS do/did exclusivity deals too and going into full marketing mode. The upgrade program is only with first party games too because they're not really selling you games but mostly a service. If you are buying games you are paying the $10/$70 for all the big publishers on xbox anyhow. Now with Activision you're even paying $70 for xbox one versions of COD, go figure.
 
Last edited:
Saturn versions of Tomb Raider 2, RE2 and others were canceled way back in the day before Xbox was even a thing.
To be fair when RE2 came out the Saturn was dead and Capcom was already in development of Code Veronica for the Dreamcast.
Tomb Raider 2?
I know people like to believe it was cancelled because Sony blocked it but like RE2 the Saturn was dying and based on the original Tomb Raider, the Saturn couldn't handle it without some considerable reworking.
 
Whose specifically only talking about Xbox ?

Saturn versions of Tomb Raider 2, RE2 and others were canceled way back in the day before Xbox was even a thing.

This is not a list war anyone wants to take, it'll become really long :messenger_grinning_sweat:
You're all about Xbox but you don't have any arguments so you revert back to talk about the usual Sega and Tomb Raider deal.

How many times we're going to read about that old shit 🙄

To be fair when RE2 came out the Saturn was dead and Capcom was already in development of Code Veronica for the Dreamcast.
Tomb Raider 2?
I know people like to believe it was cancelled because Sony blocked it but like RE2 the Saturn was dying and based on the original Tomb Raider, the Saturn couldn't handle it without some considerable reworking.
They keep rewriting history. They just repeat made up facts about Sega and Psygnosis without any research.
 
Last edited:
How many times we're going to read about that old shit 🙄

98% of the games in your list are one or two decades old.

Come on Jack.


Dead Rising
Last Remnant
Infinite Undiscovery
Star Ocean The Last Hope
GTA DLC
Dino Crisis 3
COD DLC
Morrowind and Oblivion
Ninja Gaiden
ACE COMBAT 6
Tales Of Vesperia
Tomb Raider Underworld DLC
Bioshock
Splinter Cell
Mass Effect and Jade Empire
Splinter Cell Conviction
Rainbow Six Vegas
Dead or Alive 3 and 4
PUBG
NARAKA
Rainbow Six Vegas
Ridge Racer 6
Lost Planet
Alone in the Dark
 
I'll leave you to that, for this topic about Hogwarts, since the game is coming on like 6 platforms, by its nature the content they're making exclusive cannot be essential so it's not a big loss for players on PC/Xbox/Switch here.

I mean for all we know this content was never even made for other platforms right? There wasnt any announcement mentioning anything other than Playstation. So by that logic nothing was ever taken away from any other platform.
 
I mean for all we know this content was never even made for other platforms right? There wasnt any announcement mentioning anything other than Playstation. So by that logic nothing was ever taken away from any other platform.

The OP states the content is exclusive for 12 months. It is content for the game on multiple platforms but being kept exclusive to one platform.

This is not the same as a full game never being announced for a platform.

Those are Xbox deals. Talk about them instead of deflecting to fucking Sega.


Make up your mind, when I talked about some PS deals from even before you didn't like that :messenger_tears_of_joy:

You're talking about Xbox doing deals, I'm showing you examples that Xbox has only done a fraction of what Sony has been doing for much longer.

If you don't want to hear it, that's too bad.
 
Last edited:
The OP states the content is exclusive for 12 months. It is content for the game on multiple platforms but being kept exclusive to one platform.

This is not the same as a full game never being announced for a platform.
Yes its not the same as the next big IP from a (former) multiplatform publisher. But going by your own logic, if there is no mention of other platforms, it doesnt exist. There is no other proof. I am just using your own logic.
 
98% of the games in your list are one or two decades old.

Come on Jack.

Mass Effect and Jade Empire were Microsoft Studios games they published, with BioWare (WHO AT THE TIME WAS AN INDEPENDENT DEVELOPER) as the developer.

If you include those games then you can include any Sony first party game on a similar list.
 
The OP states the content is exclusive for 12 months. It is content for the game on multiple platforms but being kept exclusive to one platform.

This is not the same as a full game never being announced for a platform.
I personally don't think it's that bad when the game is never announced to begin with.
Sony tends to grab an exclusives at the beginning of the IP's life so it's exclusive from the get go.
MS does the same, sadly those game don't usually become a series.
But they do have a habit of getting Exclusives on games that were previously on other consoles.
That I think is shitty.
 
Yes its not the same as the next big IP from a (former) multiplatform publisher. But going by your own logic, if there is no mention of other platforms, it doesnt exist. There is no other proof. I am just using your own logic.

You're not using my logic accurately lol, in this case they have specifically mentioned that the content will be on other platforms after the 12 month exclusivity period.

Mass Effect and Jade Empire were Microsoft Studios games they published, with BioWare (WHO AT THE TIME WAS AN INDEPENDENT DEVELOPER) as the developer.

If you include those games then you can include any Sony first party game on a similar list.

Oh shit you're right, I forgot MS published the first ME and Jade Empire.

I personally don't think it's that bad when the game is never announced to begin with.
Sony tends to grab an exclusives at the beginning of the IP's life so it's exclusive from the get go.
MS does the same, sadly those game don't usually become a series.
But they do have a habit of getting Exclusives on games that were previously on other consoles.
That I think is shitty.

I agree with almost everything you say, and an not excusing any case where MS has gotten timed exclusivity. It's just that historically it will trend way more towards one company than the other if we start counting.
 
You're not using my logic accurately lol, in this case they have specifically mentioned that the content will be on other platforms after the 12 month exclusivity period.

Thats not true. The text in the tweet doesnt mention any other platforms. The Twitter user is assuming that it is coming to Xbox after 12 months, but technically we dont know what happens after that period. So i ask you again. How exactly do you know that this content has been already made for other platforms?

If you havent realized by now, i am doing this shit on purpose. Obviously anyone with a normal functioning brain would correctly assume that this content is already implemented on other platforms and just needs to be toggled on.
 
I don't get this narrative that this form of exclusivity is any different than other forms of exclusivity. It is moneyhatting bullshit and it is fine to call it that but saying moneyhatting an entire game is somehow more preferable than a single mission is absurd. But I shouldn't be surprised considering the amount of hypocrisy spewing out from this console war.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom