Here's a list of various 3rd-party deals MS got. Some very high-profile series there. Poor Sony.
Dead Rising
Last Remnant
Infinite Undiscovery
Star Ocean The Last Hope
GTA DLC
Dino Crisis 3
COD DLC
Morrowind and Oblivion
Ninja Gaiden
ACE COMBAT 6
Tales Of Vesperia
Tomb Raider
Bioshock
Splinter Cell
Mass Effect and Jade Empire
Dead or Alive 3 and 4
Titanfall
The Medium
Stalker 2
Wartide
PUBG
NARAKA
Microsoft owns Bethesda and Nintendo paid for Bayonetta's development this is not on the same scale at all. Any game in this category would not exist without the platform owner's investment. They are not mere marketing deals like this Harry Potter case.You mean like Nintendo with Bayonetta, like Sony with final fantasy and street fighter and like Xbox with the next Bethesda game? But only one of those companies is being a bitch about it.
This is the worst kind of exclusivity as it is pointless and purely meant to be punitive to those who game outside of the PlayStation ecosystem. This is taking away content from gamers as a punishment for not playing where they want you. That is a fact that would be very hard to dispute.
This is essentially what this is. However people argue and it's hard to prove whether the publisher created additional free content for one platform paid for by the platform holder or cut content from the others.I'm really surprised that Sony and Microsoft more often don't just contact these companies while they make the game and just pay them to make exclusive content. That seems like the easier and cheaper form of exclusivity. I think Soul Calibur did something similar with exclusive characters for each platform. Like I'm sure Sony was aware that Capcom was making a new street fighter game. They could be like hey can we pay you to make a playstation themed stage or even pay them to add another character to the new street fighter.
"I don't know what deals get written. I've been pretty open about, I'm not a fan of doing deals that hold back specific pieces of content from other platforms. You don't see that in the deals we've done with Assassin's and Shadow. We'll have a marketing deal on those, but I don't say, hey, I need some kind of Strike or skin somebody else can't play.You mean like Nintendo with Bayonetta, like Sony with final fantasy and street fighter and like Xbox with the next Bethesda game? But only one of those companies is being a bitch about it.
I like how everyone wants to believe that this means something other than paying to keep content exclusive in order to give one platform a competitive advantage over the others.The game will receive marketing.
I think it's more about the hypocrisy than anything.One mission vs 70 billion dollars worth of exclusive content.
But arrogant Sony is back.
I think it's more about the hypocrisy than anything.
Also, why does Sony get to make the rules of acceptable purchases? I am 1000% convinced that if Sony had the funds to buy a company like Bethesda or Activision it would have been done yesterday. We wouldn't be talking about exclusivity, the answer would have been known.
Love how Jimmy boy gets a pass from you. But then we have whiners going on about the ABK deal. The gaul to even bring up "entitlement". Wow!They have a marketing deal with the game so why are grown men butthurt over some content being exclusive? This sense of entitlement, like certain content or games not coming to your system is a violation of your civil rights or something, is just childish.
And yes that could apply to Jim Ryan too over the COD statements but at least he's a businessman and says what he says for obvious strategic reasons. These randoms crying on Twitter over this stuff are just being manchildren.
There is no difference. One company can afford to go much bigger on acquisitions than the other. And the other is upset about it because it hurts their bottom line.Sony don't make any rules. The FCC, CMA etc do. It's because one is constant merger and aquisition of smaller companies into one megacorp and the other isn't.
Sony even though they could afford it wasn't buying up Ninja theory to make a sequel exclusive. The difference is only strategy and their ideology of the market and sales being completely different to MS' strategy and ideology.
I'm not in favour of any platform missing out on content.I like how everyone wants to believe that this means something other than paying to keep content exclusive in order to give one platform a competitive advantage over the others.
It's very well established that people who believe this are in favor of the paid exclusivity model that has been the norm for decades. Limiting what goes to other platforms is perfectly fine. For them it really only comes down to who is paying for it and what platform it goes to.
Difference in strategy? there is a massive one. Sony could very easily have bought small developers like Ninja Theory, Obsidian etc. It isn't about not affording it. The difference was that they didn't need to convince third parties to not sell games anymore and so didn't need to make them first party at all at the time.There is no difference. One company can afford to go much bigger on acquisitions than the other. And the other is upset about it because it hurts their bottom line.
They were trying to get Starfield exclusive. But of course thatwasdifferent.gifI think it's more about the hypocrisy than anything.
Also, why does Sony get to make the rules of acceptable purchases? I am 1000% convinced that if Sony had the funds to buy a company like Bethesda or Activision it would have been done yesterday. We wouldn't be talking about exclusivity, the answer would have been known.
But it's nothing.They're getting aggressive with pursuing longer deals for what amounts to mostly trivial, non-essential, content, seems like a bit of desperation creeping in.
How so, I'm not sure I've seen anyone call sony a saviour, they both just want your money. If anything it's the xbox loose cannons who are trying to frame multiple aquisitions of publishers by a big corporation as some kind of 'saviour' to tyranny. The same tyranny that MS does/did anyway. have you seen the Phil jesus/god memes? I think you have the one way mixed up.That's the problem. It only goes one way.
Microsoft = big bad corporation only wanting your money.
Sony = saviors of gaming.
Thank you I'm going to add it. We have to copy/paste that list anytime they cry about somethingYou forgot Fifa Ultimate Team. They got the Legends card, which were asked for from the community for years. Was available on on Xbox from Fifa 14 to Fifa 17.
Thank you I added it to the list. Damn it's getting long. How did PS survive all this damage from MS?It's not like the Tomb Raider Underworld deal where one platform has 2 chunks of missing content indefinitely.
They don't because they are never ending trolls. Some of them are to thick to even put an argument forward so rely solely on reactions.That's the furthest reach I've heard yet. Expansions not coming to your console for a year, that's fine, whole game not coming to your platform for a year due to exclusivity, that's fine, whole franchise no longer coming to your platform indefinitely just because, that's fine. No, it's some random cosmetics and a quest that's the worst evil. Honestly do you even hear yourselves sometimes?
Dead Rising
Last Remnant
Infinite Undiscovery
Star Ocean The Last Hope
GTA DLC
Dino Crisis 3
COD DLC
Morrowind and Oblivion
Ninja Gaiden
ACE COMBAT 6
Tales Of Vesperia
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Tomb Raider Underworld DLC
Bioshock
Splinter Cell
Mass Effect and Jade Empire
Splinter Cell Conviction
Rainbow Six Vegas
Dead or Alive 3 and 4
Titanfall
The Medium
Stalker 2
Wartide
PUBG
NARAKA
FiFA Legends DLC
Oh you doing a listThank you I'm going to add it. We have to copy/paste that list anytime they cry about something
They are so quiet about these deals like MS was innocent all along.
![]()
FIFA 14: Ultimate Team Legends is exclusive to Xbox One
FIFA 14 Ultimate Team Legends was revealed at Microsoft's Xbox One press event at Gamescom in Cologne today. Check out …www.vg247.com
Thank you I added it to the list. Damn it's getting long. How did PS survive all this damage from MS?
Dead Rising
Last Remnant
Infinite Undiscovery
Star Ocean The Last Hope
GTA DLC
Dino Crisis 3
COD DLC
Morrowind and Oblivion
Ninja Gaiden
ACE COMBAT 6
Tales Of Vesperia
Rise of the Tomb Raider
Tomb Raider Underworld DLC
Bioshock
Splinter Cell
Mass Effect and Jade Empire
Dead or Alive 3 and 4
Titanfall
The Medium
Stalker 2
Wartide
PUBG
NARAKA
FiFA Legends DLC
Love how Jimmy boy gets a pass from you. But then we have whiners going on about the ABK deal. The gaul to even bring up "entitlement". Wow!
Beggars can't be choosers.That's it ? That isn't even 1% of the deals Sony makes lol
There are way more even from this gen like Scorn, Tunic but I chose mostly from high-profile publishers or franchises.That's it ? That isn't even 1% of the deals Sony makes lol
Beggars can't be choosers.
I mean some of those IP's actually died on that hill.
But yeah it's nothing compared to the PS2 era
They both want your money but it's nice when one company has an extensive backward compatibility program, gives free upgrades to next generation games, offers free cloud saves, and doesn't raise their console prices in the middle of a massive recessionary period.How so, I'm not sure I've seen anyone call sony a saviour, they both just want your money. If anything it's the xbox loose cannons who are trying to frame multiple aquisitions of publishers by a big corporation as some kind of 'saviour' to tyranny. The same tyranny that MS does/did anyway. have you seen the Phil jesus/god memes? I think you have the one way mixed up.
RE is a tricky one because all of them have appeared on other consolesNot even PS2. Entire franchises like FF, RE, Silent Hill and tons of both Western and Japanese IP were locked to the PS1 and PS2 for any number of reasons.
Trying to make a list of things Xbox has money-hatted compared to what Sony have done over the last 26 years is a little foolish lol
Those were not even moneyhats. You think publishers had to go back and make Xbox versions of all their games because MS decided to launch a new consoleNot even PS2. Entire franchises like FF, RE, Silent Hill and tons of both Western and Japanese IP were locked to the PS1 and PS2 for any number of reasons.
Those were not even moneyhats. You think publishers had to go back and make Xbox versions of all their games because MS decided to launch a new console
Silent Hill Homecoming/Downpour and the next games on those series came out on Xbox. Sony was not blocking them.
They both want your money but it's nice when one company has an extensive backward compatibility program, gives free upgrades to next generation games, offers free cloud saves, and doesn't raise their console prices in the middle of a massive recessionary period.
You are free to complain about any platform you wish but there is a reason people like MS' vision for gaming. Using your massive finances to make gaming more affordable and a better value for the consumer matters quite a bit. It'd be nice to see all platforms treat their customers with that sort of 'tyranny'.
To be fair when RE2 came out the Saturn was dead and Capcom was already in development of Code Veronica for the Dreamcast.Saturn versions of Tomb Raider 2, RE2 and others were canceled way back in the day before Xbox was even a thing.
You're all about Xbox but you don't have any arguments so you revert back to talk about the usual Sega and Tomb Raider deal.Whose specifically only talking about Xbox ?
Saturn versions of Tomb Raider 2, RE2 and others were canceled way back in the day before Xbox was even a thing.
This is not a list war anyone wants to take, it'll become really long![]()
They keep rewriting history. They just repeat made up facts about Sega and Psygnosis without any research.To be fair when RE2 came out the Saturn was dead and Capcom was already in development of Code Veronica for the Dreamcast.
Tomb Raider 2?
I know people like to believe it was cancelled because Sony blocked it but like RE2 the Saturn was dying and based on the original Tomb Raider, the Saturn couldn't handle it without some considerable reworking.
How many times we're going to read about that old shit![]()
Dead Rising
Last Remnant
Infinite Undiscovery
Star Ocean The Last Hope
GTA DLC
Dino Crisis 3
COD DLC
Morrowind and Oblivion
Ninja Gaiden
ACE COMBAT 6
Tales Of Vesperia
Tomb Raider Underworld DLC
Bioshock
Splinter Cell
Mass Effect and Jade Empire
Splinter Cell Conviction
Rainbow Six Vegas
Dead or Alive 3 and 4
PUBG
NARAKA
Rainbow Six Vegas
Ridge Racer 6
Lost Planet
Alone in the Dark
I'll leave you to that, for this topic about Hogwarts, since the game is coming on like 6 platforms, by its nature the content they're making exclusive cannot be essential so it's not a big loss for players on PC/Xbox/Switch here.
Those are Xbox deals. Talk about them instead of deflecting to fucking Sega.98% of the games in your list are one or two decades old.
Come on Jack.
I mean for all we know this content was never even made for other platforms right? There wasnt any announcement mentioning anything other than Playstation. So by that logic nothing was ever taken away from any other platform.
Those are Xbox deals. Talk about them instead of deflecting to fucking Sega.
Yes its not the same as the next big IP from a (former) multiplatform publisher. But going by your own logic, if there is no mention of other platforms, it doesnt exist. There is no other proof. I am just using your own logic.The OP states the content is exclusive for 12 months. It is content for the game on multiple platforms but being kept exclusive to one platform.
This is not the same as a full game never being announced for a platform.
98% of the games in your list are one or two decades old.
Come on Jack.
I personally don't think it's that bad when the game is never announced to begin with.The OP states the content is exclusive for 12 months. It is content for the game on multiple platforms but being kept exclusive to one platform.
This is not the same as a full game never being announced for a platform.
Yes its not the same as the next big IP from a (former) multiplatform publisher. But going by your own logic, if there is no mention of other platforms, it doesnt exist. There is no other proof. I am just using your own logic.
Mass Effect and Jade Empire were Microsoft Studios games they published, with BioWare (WHO AT THE TIME WAS AN INDEPENDENT DEVELOPER) as the developer.
If you include those games then you can include any Sony first party game on a similar list.
I personally don't think it's that bad when the game is never announced to begin with.
Sony tends to grab an exclusives at the beginning of the IP's life so it's exclusive from the get go.
MS does the same, sadly those game don't usually become a series.
But they do have a habit of getting Exclusives on games that were previously on other consoles.
That I think is shitty.
You're not using my logic accurately lol, in this case they have specifically mentioned that the content will be on other platforms after the 12 month exclusivity period.