Success
Member
Need to see pictures of your crow first
I am surprised to see you with no GAFGold.
You are easily one of the most recognizable community members.
Need to see pictures of your crow first
Everything is joke. Just like us giving attention to sales.Playtracker's accuracy is what, again?
Most of these player/sales tracking sites are total and complete jokes.
Massive, and growing.
you did it ya cunts, you normalized paying for early access for AAA single player games and made it popular!!!
bravo!
![]()
Premium additions and the ability to purchase Expansion content has been around for over a decade now. As a value add, some MS tentpole games include early access with the premium content. To frame this as spending $35 bucks just to play 5 days early is just silly.Two million people that have nothing better do to with their money than spend it to play a video game a few days early. Wow.
This is exactly why we don't matter. The industry can do whatever the fuck they want at this point, people will gobble it up. 30-40$ for early access and a promise... dear lord, the state of this industry.
It's up to 49.65%Says 38.54% for me now on the Xbox app on PC, I just looked at a random person from TrueAchievements who was one of the first to unlock it. Interesting to see it updates regularly on the app then, because TA only does it once every 24 hours.
Interestingly he has only unlocked that one achievement in the game, on 31st August. Play time 2 hours 6 minutes(Yes it is probably weird me stalking this random person but their stats are public.)
Two million people that have nothing better do to with their money than spend it to play a video game a few days early. Wow.
This is exactly why we don't matter. The industry can do whatever the fuck they want at this point, people will gobble it up. 30-40$ for early access and a promise... dear lord, the state of this industry.
Two million people that have nothing better do to with their money than spend it to play a video game a few days early. Wow.
This is exactly why we don't matter. The industry can do whatever the fuck they want at this point, people will gobble it up. 30-40$ for early access and a promise... dear lord, the state of this industry.
Yeah, imagine not being upset by people creating a shitty new standard for the industry to move forward with. Imagine that.imagine getting upset because other people decided to pay for the premium version of a game with their own money.
That's why included "a promise", so yes.You know this version includes the expansion pack?
So your argument boils down to "it has been done for almost a decade, so it's ok"? Hm. I just don't agree, sorry.Premium additions and the ability to purchase Expansion content has been around for over a decade now. As a value add, some MS tentpole games include early access with the premium content. To frame this as spending $35 bucks just to play 5 days early is just silly.
Now, for someone who is interested in the additional content, this for sure might push them over the line to purchase, rather than buy it down the road, but there is nothing inherently nefarious about the practice. The industry has bundled beta access into preorders and premium content packs for years without illiciting this "cause for concern".
Unless there's evidence that's just a guess on your side. I wouldn't pay the extra just for the early access, but getting a DLC is really good considering previous Bethesda games had stuff like Dragonborn or Far Harbor.And let's be honest here, most people bought the Premium Version because of EA and the opportunity to play over the weekend. It is nice that they include the expansion, but that's, at this point, nothing but a promise.
Weren't the majority of Bethesda DLCs kind of a mixed bag?Unless there's evidence that's just a guess on your side. I wouldn't pay the extra just for the early access, but getting a DLC is really good considering previous Bethesda games had stuff like Dragonborn or Far Harbor.
You don't lose anything by playing a single player game five days later anyway…
Hearthfire wasn't a story expansion, it basically added housing, waifus and a couple other things mostly used for RP. Fallout 4 also had a couple expansions adding new objects but no story, and they're priced differently than story expansions.Weren't the majority of Bethesda DLCs kind of a mixed bag?
Far Harbour was around 80 as well, with the user score lower.
- Dawnguard DLC: Metacritic - 77/100 (PC), 84/100 (360), 76/100 (PS3)
- Hearthfire DLC: Metacritic - 67/100 (PC), 67/100 (360), 67/100 (PS3)
- Dragonborn DLC: Metacritic - 81/100 (PC), 81/100 (360), 81/100 (PS3)
I feel like the last really good DLC's Bethesda did were with Oblivion.
Damn, so you're saying I need to play F04 again and play Far Harbour, eh? Totally missed that expansion!Hearthfire wasn't a story expansion, it basically added housing, waifus and a couple other things mostly used for RP. Fallout 4 also had a couple expansions adding new objects but no story, and they're priced differently than story expansions.
The rest seems to be around 80 which I wouldn't call a mixed bag. Far Harbor in particular was a step up from FO4 in terms of quest design imo.
It goes on sale regularly for $5, at that price you're not risking much.Damn, so you're saying I need to play F04 again and play Far Harbour, eh? Totally missed that expansion!
It goes on sale regularly for $5, at that price you're not risking much.
It expands on the synths lore a lot and the choices you make are impactful, with multiple really different endings. It's a good expansion imo.
Wow that's amazing. Two million players all together with just the people that paid for early access. I saw a lot of posts in here insinuating this game failed because it only scored 88. If this failure success must be really amazing. I'm really glad the game is doing so well. Bethesda RPGs are my favorites RPGs by 10 miles, nothing else comes close.
I really liked TotK, it's a very good game, but not nearly as much as I love this game, it's totally taken over my life.
Yeah, imagine not being upset by people creating a shitty new standard for the industry to move forward with. Imagine that.
You know, people like you once said "imagine getting upset about 5$ horse armor" after Oblivion, and look where that got us. It's such a shitty argument.
Weren't the majority of Bethesda DLCs kind of a mixed bag?
Far Harbour was around 80 as well, with the user score lower.
- Dawnguard DLC: Metacritic - 77/100 (PC), 84/100 (360), 76/100 (PS3)
- Hearthfire DLC: Metacritic - 67/100 (PC), 67/100 (360), 67/100 (PS3)
- Dragonborn DLC: Metacritic - 81/100 (PC), 81/100 (360), 81/100 (PS3)
I feel like the last really good DLC's Bethesda did were with Oblivion.
Firstly, my argument "boils down" to facts and the reality of the gaming scene for the past decade. Secondly, if you burden of proof to be convinced of something is "it feels that way" then that would explain your statements.So your argument boils down to "it has been done for almost a decade, so it's ok"? Hm. I just don't agree, sorry.
And let's be honest here, most people bought the Premium Version because of EA and the opportunity to play over the weekend. It is nice that they include the expansion, but that's, at this point, nothing but a promise.
Why? Because it's true?The 'horse armor' stuff is a tiresome argument at this point.
So... "it has always been this way (for the past 10 years)". Gottcha.Firstly, my argument "boils down" to facts and the reality of the gaming scene for the past decade. Secondly, if you burden of proof to be convinced of something is "it feels that way" then that would explain your statements.
Those numbers are a little mind-blowing. They're about twenty times higher than I might have loosely imagined. What we still don't know is if a lot more people already bought this game, or if most people that bought it also paid for DLC with early access.
Yes occam's razor is your friend. The only question that needs to he asked is do many of people buy Bethesda story expansions? If the answer is close to yes, then that pokes some big holes in your claim.So... "it has always been this way (for the past 10 years)". Gottcha.
And, you will never be able to have data on how many people bought EA because of XY or Z, but in that case, Occam's Razor is going to be your best bet. And it's not because of the cosmetics. Can we please stop pretending otherwise? I know you wanna win an argument, but jeez, just look at the mobile market, people are willing to spent billions on figurative hamster wheels. Sure, the promised expansion helped, but most would've bought it just for the 5 days EA.
Oh MarkMe, you're not getting it.Yes occam's razor is your friend. The only question that needs to he asked is do many of people buy Bethesda story expansions? If the answer is close to yes, then that pokes some big holes in your claim.
People spending money on mobile game gems does nothing to bolster your stance. No one was refuting that people spend money on extra content for games they like. That quite literally was one of my points.
I'm not getting "it" because your claim, and the evidence presented doesn't have anything to do with one another.Oh MarkMe, you're not getting it.
My point was not that people spend money on games the like, my point was that people will spend money on literally anything, even if it's a trash mobile game that no one plays. and just because corpos can take advantage of that doesn't mean they should.
And we should most certainly not defend that practise for them under the guise of "people can do with their money whatever they want". Yes. They can.
And I can complain about the consequences. Soon enough you can pay 40-50 dollars for 4 weeks EA, because why the hell not, people will buy it.
Here's your evidence:I'm not getting "it" because your claim, and the evidence presented doesn't have anything to do with one another.
You just repeat that "people will buy anything" as if that is supposed to mean anything. Like if I said "people buy cars because they like to have drink holders" and when you ask for any evidence, it would be close to moronic for me to say "well you know people will spend money on anything".
I heard a rumor that Todd went on a road trip to force people to buy this by holding a gun to their head. They had no choice at all. I don't know if it's true. That's just what I heard.Here's your evidence:
![]()
Funnily enough by the very same company. We'll take again once you can buy 4 weeks of EA, alright?![]()
Be careful, you are shortly going to run out of places to move the goalpost.Here's your evidence:
![]()
Funnily enough by the very same company. We'll take again once you can buy 4 weeks of EA, alright?![]()
I heard of this and for sure it's true, just use occam's razor. I know for sure because "it feels right".I heard a rumor that Todd went on a road trip to force people to buy this by holding a gun to their head. They had no choice at all. I don't know if it's true. That's just what I heard.
Wonder how high it will go this weekend. Can it hit like 800K to 1Mil?
Hmm, that low you think? Got to be higher even with PC GamePass I would think. A lot of players would want full modding capabilities with Steam version.It may hit 300k.
Hmm, that low you think? Got to be higher even with PC GamePass I would think. A lot of players would want full modding capabilities with Steam version.
300K would be quite low considering the hype.
Interesting, I guess GamePass really hit the Steam sales hard or the game hasn't quite clicked as most people expected. It's going to be interesting to see what happens over the weekend.The only actual tracking of concurrent players is on Steam, which hasn't jumped significantly since actually releasing. Games don't tend to jump 4 times higher in active player count a few days after release.
Yeah the first few hours I couldn't help but think am I playing mass effect? It felt very same usb to me. Mystery artifact / main hub town dialogue. Tree etc I get they are not the same but it felt very much like a worse version of mass effect for me outside the space fighting aspect for a few hours!That would mean that almost 40% of Xbox owners (including Gamepass?) went for the premium? If that is the case, Xbox found a way to make Gamepass more profitable, that's for sure.
I played around 20 hours over the 4-day weekend, so around 2$CAD an hour, it was well invested, the game was average at the beginning but it become really great after a few hours.
He doesn't care he just wants to call people names that does stuff he doesn't like
Had this discussion with somebody on here a couple weeks ago and he was saying the same thing: "You're paying $35 for early access." I told him to keep an eye on the price of the Premium Upgrade before and after early access and release. Here it is...Two million people that have nothing better do to with their money than spend it to play a video game a few days early. Wow.
This is exactly why we don't matter. The industry can do whatever the fuck they want at this point, people will gobble it up. 30-40$ for early access and a promise... dear lord, the state of this industry.
It gets better from my perspective. It feels really like the 2001 movie.Yeah the first few hours I couldn't help but think am I playing mass effect? It felt very same usb to me. Mystery artifact / main hub town dialogue. Tree etc I get they are not the same but it felt very much like a worse version of mass effect for me outside the space fighting aspect for a few hours!
1 - cracked on day zero ( Before even the game was out ) . I guess not having denuvo on a single player game is a super bad idea hehThis is lower than I expected on release day.
This is lower than I expected on release day.