casey_contra
Member
Well if he says the source is labile who am I to question it?
Labile, hahaha. I love it.
Well if he says the source is labile who am I to question it?
Sorry, there are plenty of NX threads and I'm not following everything, but where was this mockup discussed?
Sorry, there are plenty of NX threads and I'm not following everything, but where was this mockup discussed?
Sorry, there are plenty of NX threads and I'm not following everything, but where was this mockup discussed?
Mochizuki posted more about his interview with Ishihara. It mentions nothing about the NX, but there are some good quotes.
Mr. Ishihara said hes particularly attached to Exeggutor, a character that looks like a coconut tree. Mr. Ishihara said that Exeggutor became his friend while he checked the programming of the game, and together they explored many places within it and captured characters. Mr. Ishihara said he wants to give Exeggutor more of the spotlight.
In the coming 3DS games, titled Sun and Moon, a new type of Exeggutor with a longer neck will be introduced.
My dream is finally a reality, Mr. Ishihara said. Im glad to see what Exeggutor has become.
In Japanese Red and Green, an unused function exists that adds three Pokémon to the player's party:
Exeggutor (Level 90)
Ekans (Level 90)
Rhydon (Level 5)
Would Vita still be handheld?
Would a hypothetical NX console less of a console if it uses cartridges?
Would a future XBOX or PS without a disc drive be less of a console?
If I buy only digital games that I can cross play between PS4 and Vita does it mean that my hypothetical PS4 is less of a console and my hypothetical Vita is less of a handheld?
Sorry, there are plenty of NX threads and I'm not following everything, but where was this mockup discussed?
Maybe I'm misreading - just glancing over some of the posts up the page - but how seriously are people taking the idea that the NX is going to be unique or unprecedented?
As far as an individual piece of hardware goes, we've got detachable controllers and TV out. Those are already distinguishing features. I find it hard to imagine that we'd get this amount of information but not the main feature. If the main selling point hasn't been revealed yet, it's probably a software feature.
I also don't think it should weigh too heavily in discussions of what the hybrid is, because it's hard to imagine an implementation that hasn't been done in some way. We've seen handhelds that plug into the TV. We've seen a console-handheld duo that plays the same games. We've seen a series of hardware that all play the same software. I have yet to hear a description of the hybrid that sounds totally unique (except maybe some joke ones).
What I'm thinking is that either the hybrid concept is unique to Nintendo, or it's unique in that Nintendo is building their strategy around it.
Local multiplayer for everyone.The idea of detachable controller still seems so surreal though. What's the point other than make it seem awkward and cheap?
For relevance. (Somewhat abridged.)
Local multiplayer for everyone.
Since every console will have it, every game can have it.
I also suspect will be able to change them for better control/portability.
i.e. put controllers with circlepads on it to make it a little more portable friendly. Put a controller with larger sticks/ triggers on the back for a better home console experience.
Local multiplayer for everyone.
Since every console will have it, every game can have it.
Local multiplayer for everyone.
Since every console will have it, every game can have it.
He let the Meowth out of the Pokeball, I'd say.
sorry
This is the best thing to happen to handhelds, quite literally.
You no longer have to worry about servicing the entire freaking thing if the controls break or deteriorate (as they always do).
The idea of detachable controller still seems so surreal though. What's the point other than make it seem awkward and cheap?
This is the best thing to happen to handhelds, quite literally.
You no longer have to worry about servicing the entire freaking thing if the controls break or deteriorate (as they always do).
I love that idea lol.
Like Nintendo will sell its console with the catch phrase "You can now replace things when they break!! wouhouuu!"
People will love that.
But even that doesn't really make sense after all...
_Devs were not doing local multi cause there wasn't a second controller in the box, really ? People who want local multi have a second controller anyway.. It never stopped devs from doing local multi before..
_It's going to be tough to play a multiplayer game on a 6,2" screen.. Try. Take a 3ds XL, put it in front of you, now be far enough so that you and a friend can waggle mini wiimotes to play just dance. Do it.
_It's not going to be full control with those detachable controllers.. So it won't work with traditional console games, or at least Monster Hunter ones, complex ones. That means it works for specific games using 1 or 2 buttons and motion control. Probably casual ones from Ubisoft for exemple.
Everything for now tends to show that this whole detachable controller thing serves a casual purpose rather than a gamer one.
I mean the argument from Nintendo cannot be : Heyyy we gave you a second controller for free! That's not an innovation lol...
Now the argument can be: "Heyyyy we have a portable Wii that you can use everywhere at your friend's place" but even that seems not a guarantied success 11 years after the Wii..
Well some level of multiplayer or limited to experiences that can be played using the equivelent of a wiimote when split like the rumors suggest. Better then nothing though
I think local multiplayer will be with snes style controllers, not wii like.
I don't think there is going to be a single unique feature, but I thinks there will be a combined feature set implemented in a way that's never been done before. We never seen all the things in your post combined in a single device.Maybe I'm misreading - just glancing over some of the posts up the page - but how seriously are people taking the idea that the NX is going to be unique or unprecedented?
As far as an individual piece of hardware goes, we've got detachable controllers and TV out. Those are already distinguishing features. I find it hard to imagine that we'd get this amount of information but not the main feature. If the main selling point hasn't been revealed yet, it's probably a software feature.
I also don't think it should weigh too heavily in discussions of what the hybrid is, because it's hard to imagine an implementation that hasn't been done in some way. We've seen handhelds that plug into the TV. We've seen a console-handheld duo that plays the same games. We've seen a series of hardware that all play the same software. I have yet to hear a description of the hybrid that sounds totally unique (except maybe some joke ones).
What I'm thinking is that either the hybrid concept is unique to Nintendo, or it's unique in that Nintendo is building their strategy around it.
I think local multiplayer will be with snes style controllers, not wii like.
Everything for now tends to show that this whole detachable controller thing serves a casual purpose rather than a gamer one.
Would you play Smash with it ?
"Casual" and "gamer" are not mutually exclusive.
They are in my opinion, to a certain degree. Cause when your console becomes a casual hit, it's filled with shovelware and gamers avoid it like plague after some months.
But even that doesn't really make sense after all...
_Devs were not doing local multi cause there wasn't a second controller in the box, really ? People who want local multi have a second controller anyway.. It never stopped devs from doing local multi before..
_It's going to be tough to play a multiplayer game on a 6,2" screen.. Try. Take a 3ds XL, put it in front of you, now be far enough so that you and a friend can waggle mini wiimotes to play just dance. Do it.
_It's not going to be full control with those detachable controllers.. So it won't work with traditional console games, or at least Monster Hunter ones, complex ones. That means it works for specific games using 1 or 2 buttons and motion control. Probably casual ones from Ubisoft for exemple.
Everything for now tends to show that this whole detachable controller thing serves a casual purpose rather than a gamer one.
I mean the argument from Nintendo cannot be : Heyyy we gave you a second controller for free! That's not an innovation lol...
Now the argument can be: "Heyyyy we have a portable Wii that you can use everywhere at your friend's place" but even that seems not a guarantied success 11 years after the Wii..
And you say we seen console/ handheld with the same library??
Well yeah. The wiimote turned to the side was basically that. But not all games can be played snes style. There wont be enough buttons to play all games. Not to mention no dual sticks in thst form
Would you play Smash with it ?
Maybe I'm misreading - just glancing over some of the posts up the page - but how seriously are people taking the idea that the NX is going to be unique or unprecedented?
As far as an individual piece of hardware goes, we've got detachable controllers and TV out. Those are already distinguishing features. I find it hard to imagine that we'd get this amount of information but not the main feature. If the main selling point hasn't been revealed yet, it's probably a software feature.
I also don't think it should weigh too heavily in discussions of what the hybrid is, because it's hard to imagine an implementation that hasn't been done in some way. We've seen handhelds that plug into the TV. We've seen a console-handheld duo that plays the same games. We've seen a series of hardware that all play the same software. I have yet to hear a description of the hybrid that sounds totally unique (except maybe some joke ones).
What I'm thinking is that either the hybrid concept is unique to Nintendo, or it's unique in that Nintendo is building their strategy around it.
So why did all the "gamer" software on Wii sell better than it did on basically any Nintendo home console that came before? Come on, now.
Oh, wait, you're talking about "hardcore" gamers who have built up an idol about what "video games" are that was fed to them by marketing people who want to capture billions of dollars from 18-35 year old males.
I'd argue that these people and the software that's made for them are actually really really poor representations of "gamers" and "video games" on the whole.
I think this feature is aimed at casual gamers. It would be a tablet, with 2 snes controllers so you can play with friends. It can do everything a tablet does + nintendo games + 2 controllers.
The original NES had two wired controllers.
But since the machine is more powerful than a wii u , it could be a gamers console when you use a normal controller, either on the go or in your tv.
Of course they did the market was twice as big and people needed games to play on it after they stopped playing Wii Sport... New Mario Bros Wii was a huge casual melancholia hit you know... When you have a sudden giant crowd owning a console from Nintendo, they will go for the mario games.
That's what i'm saying. Except i'm also saying it will come at a cost. That casual oriented feature is a big part of the device design to begin with.
I thought you said that "casual" players didn't like software made for "gamers."
I thought you said that "gamers" didn't want Wii.
If a fucking Mario game (the game on which the game industry we have today was built) isn't a game for "gamers," then what the fuck are "gamers"?
What would that cost be? When atached is a normal controller and you could atach a pro controller.
The only problem is that it will be a not so powerfull home console, but we would never get that form nintendo anyways.
Game Gear was a dedicated handheld. Nomad is the better example
If you need to go that far back for an example, I say what's old is new againWell there's this:
But I personally suspect that we're going to see an iOS situation.
Well there's this:
But I personally suspect that we're going to see an iOS situation.
Its called hooking it up to a tv via dock.But even that doesn't really make sense after all...
_Devs were not doing local multi cause there wasn't a second controller in the box, really ? People who want local multi have a second controller anyway.. It never stopped devs from doing local multi before..
_It's going to be tough to play a multiplayer game on a 6,2" screen.. Try. Take a 3ds XL, put it in front of you, now be far enough so that you and a friend can waggle mini wiimotes to play just dance. Do it.
_It's not going to be full control with those detachable controllers.. So it won't work with traditional console games, or at least Monster Hunter ones, complex ones. That means it works for specific games using 1 or 2 buttons and motion control. Probably casual ones from Ubisoft for exemple.
Everything for now tends to show that this whole detachable controller thing serves a casual purpose rather than a gamer one.
I mean the argument from Nintendo cannot be : Heyyy we gave you a second controller for free! That's not an innovation lol...
Now the argument can be: "Heyyyy we have a portable Wii that you can use everywhere at your friend's place" but even that seems not a guarantied success 11 years after the Wii..
Not many Nintendo games come to mind where camera control isn't automated in multiplayer. Either stuff where everyone shares one screen (NSMB, SM3DW, Smash) or something like Mario Kart where the extent is level of zoom.So when in multiplayer detached mode, do we think they'll replace the right stick with the use of gyro, and how would that work in multiplayer? Or will they possibly add new 3DS style nubs? I'm trying to think how this could work in practice. Perhaps with the intention of both players playing on the same portable screen, the experience of games will be tailored towards that. I doubt they'd do split screen on a 6 inch device for example. So perhaps camera controls could become irrelevant to a point with local multiplayer unless it's specifically playing local MP on the TV. So many scenarios making me dizzy.
Wiimote + Nunchuk control is the best.The idea of detachable controller still seems so surreal though. What's the point other than make it seem awkward and cheap?
Game Gear was a dedicated handheld. Nomad is the better example