Please no. Pllleeeeaaase.I think Gillibrand would be a good substitute for Hillary.
Please no. Pllleeeeaaase.I think Gillibrand would be a good substitute for Hillary.
The new law practically begs partisan poll watchers to challenge every such provisional ballot so as to place the burden on the registered voter to twice prove his or her voting rights. And that's the whole point of the law. Many voters will have their "reasonable impediments" refused by untrained local election officials. And for those voters who somehow pass that discretionary test, there will be the provisional challenges later in the week, challenges structured so as to deny the voter a reasonable right to be heard.
This isn't about protecting against voter fraud. This is all about taking away the vote from minorities, the poor, and the ill -- taking it away from people who have voted without incident for decades. It's not Andino's fault. She's just the poor bureaucrat left to try to explain the inexplicable: how all of this could come to pass in the United States of America 50 years after passage of the Voting Rights Act.
I don't know if he'll lose any votes on that, but the idea that he doesn't exactly remember his best marathon time is ridiculous to anyone with even a passing interest in long distance running.
Seriously, this is true. I've never managed to train up for a marathon without injuring myself, but I could rattle off times for anything else I've done.
Democrats speaking to the Iowa delegates at the DNC - possible presidential candidates:
O'Malley, Klobuchar, Warner, Gillibrand, and Schweitzer are all possible candidates. I think Gillibrand would be a good substitute for Hillary.
Do you have a link to the full segment? I've only seen the part where she yells and would be interested in the context.Wow, Melissa Harris Perry was pretty pissed this morning discussing welfare.
Of course, what do you expect from those people.
Democrats speaking to the Iowa delegates at the DNC - possible presidential candidates:
O'Malley, Klobuchar, Warner, Gillibrand, and Schweitzer are all possible candidates. I think Gillibrand would be a good substitute for Hillary.
I can't remember my exact marathon time, and I've only run one.
Gallup still at Obama +1 this morning. Dat bounce.
Yeah, he is quite the asshole. Such a bully.i dunno why this guy is still a surrogate, he's pretty terrible.
I can't remember my exact marathon time, and I've only run one.
Gallup still at Obama +1 this morning. Dat bounce.
Wow.
Romney has to be absolutely furious that the Eastwood speech took all attention away from what was probably his best speech yet.
Gallup still at Obama +1 this morning. Dat bounce.
Gallup still at Obama +1 this morning. Dat bounce.
ROFL! OMFG. I can't stop laughing. Has this happened before in history? Holy shit.
Don't get too excited. Their Romney vs. Obama chart is a 7 day rolling average. Their Obama approval rating is only a 3 day rolling average and Obama had a net 4% decrease in approval today, the biggest single day drop in a long while.
Don't get too excited. Their Romney vs. Obama chart is a 7 day rolling average. Their Obama approval rating is only a 3 day rolling average and Obama had a net 4% decrease in approval today, the biggest single day drop in a long while.
Yeah this. At the same time, however, even Rasmussen is giving Romney a very slight bounce.
It seems on average it'll be a 2 point bump.
Should be negated after the DNC.Don't get too excited. Their Romney vs. Obama chart is a 7 day rolling average. Their Obama approval rating is only a 3 day rolling average and Obama had a net 4% decrease in approval today, the biggest single day drop in a long while.
Fuck Rasmussen.Rasmussen has given Romney a 6 point bump so far (Obama was up 2 last tuesday, Romney up 4 today). I doubt Gallup's will be that high though.
Michigan's had a lot of junk polls and 538 has it as Safe Obama. Don't worry about it.Electoral-vote has 48/47 for Obama in MI and WI.
That's too close for comfort.
Don't get too excited. Their Romney vs. Obama chart is a 7 day rolling average. Their Obama approval rating is only a 3 day rolling average and Obama had a net 4% decrease in approval today, the biggest single day drop in a long while.
Electoral-vote has 48/47 for Obama in MI and WI.
That's too close for comfort.
President Obama wants to make it clear that, in his own words, "I am a huge Clint Eastwood fan."
"He is a great actor, and an even better director," the president said in an interview with USA TODAY aboard Air Force One, on his way to campaign rallies in Iowa Saturday. "I think the last few movies that he's made have been terrific."
"One thing about being president or running for president if you're easily offended, you should probably choose another profession." Obama said with a smile. He said there would be no effort to counter with a similar stunt at the Democratic National Convention, which opens in Charlotte Tuesday.
"I think we'll be playing this pretty straight," he said
Electoral-vote has 48/47 for Obama in MI and WI.
That's too close for comfort.
There is absolutely no way Obama loses Michigan.
Yep, same with PA. Regardless of the voter ID laws, he's safe.There is absolutely no way Obama loses Michigan.
I bet Obama must be counting the days till the first debate. Considering that he doesn't think much of Romney, he must really want to lay into him about all the lies being thrown out in his ads.
http://www.2012presidentialelectionnews.com/2012-debate-schedule/2012-presidential-debate-schedule/
The VP debate should be pretty interesting. It'll be a challenge for Ryan, since they're not going to discuss the economy and just stick with foreign and domestic policies.
I bet Obama must be counting the days till the first debate. Considering that he doesn't think much of Romney, he must really want to lay into him about all the lies being thrown out in his ads.
http://www.2012presidentialelectionnews.com/2012-debate-schedule/2012-presidential-debate-schedule/
The VP debate should be pretty interesting. It'll be a challenge for Ryan, since they're not going to discuss the economy and just stick with foreign and domestic policies.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/03/b...kevin-maurer.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&src=twrhpIt is only after the George W. Bush presidency that the author begins complaining about the slow-moving Washington machine that members of the SEALs found frustrating. That irritation mounts in 2011, when the SEALs anxiously awaited their signal to raid Abbottabad, but this account is determined to steer clear of serious politics or leave itself open to election-season manipulation. The worst it has to say about President Obama is that none of the fighters who caught bin Laden wanted to help re-elect him, and that he never followed through on a promise to invite them to the White House for a beer.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/03/b...kevin-maurer.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&src=twrhp
Well that sucks. C'mon Obama...
I really need to stop engaging with conservatives I know. I showed him the Forbes piece on how Obama has spent less than any president since Eisenhower, and he refused to acknowledge that it is true and eventually asking another liberal person in the conversation how they sleep at night knowing they support murderers. When someone devolves into that lazy abortion bullshit because they dont want to talk about the issue at hand because they want to "win" they aren't even worth engaging.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/03/b...kevin-maurer.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1&src=twrhp
Well that sucks. C'mon Obama...
Wow, Melissa Harris Perry was pretty pissed this morning discussing welfare.
Of course, what do you expect from those people.
President Bush allowed abortions under his watch and funded Planned Parenthood. How did your friend sleep at night for 8 years?I really need to stop engaging with conservatives I know. I showed him the Forbes piece on how Obama has spent less than any president since Eisenhower, and he refused to acknowledge that it is true and eventually asking another liberal person in the conversation how they sleep at night knowing they support murderers. When someone devolves into that lazy abortion bullshit because they dont want to talk about the issue at hand because they want to "win" they aren't even worth engaging.
lol Libertarian drama lol
"I hired thirty hookers and sent them into Ron Paul's speech at the Sun Dome wearing these really skintight low-cut Gary Johnson T-shirts they weren't hookers they were dancers, exotic dancers, pardon me. I sent them because they wouldn't let us in."
"Why wouldn't Ron Paul let you into his speech?
Because Ron would like to hand the franchise off to Rand. The Pauls are about money. They raised $47 million, and at least 5 of it was spent on the campaign. And a lot of the rest of it went into the pockets of Rand Paul family members and other hangers-on. It's a great franchise, so we're gonna try to hand the franchise to the idiot son. It's not going to work, because when this is over, I think Johnson will have greater cache."
I don't see how. Anyone who published pics or names would get the press death sentence pretty muchHow lame of him. Unless there was some kind of security issue in doing that.
Keep in mind that is a low end estimate as Paul accepts donations in troy ounces.