Oh wow... flashbacks to PoliGAF '08. "Pimped Out"I wonder how some of you could have managed with APF around.
you are whatever the gun version of a furry is.Anyone want to try and guess the right answer?
No, since I beleive sticking ones dick into the action of an M1 Garand is not advisable.you are whatever the gun version of a furry is.
Oh btw, regarding that Univision thing about Mittens busing in supporters, didn't he do the same thing busing in black people when he was giving a speech at the NAACP?
Thank you.I've said it before, but Manos is just the lovable neighborhood gun nut, but he caucuses with the Dems.
Oh btw, regarding that Univision thing about Mittens busing in supporters, didn't he do the same thing busing in black people when he was giving a speech at the NAACP?
Oh please Mitt was clearly singing Da Mystery of Chessboxin.Yea. He also claimed after that speech that Black leaders support him privately or some shit like that.
He probably sang who let the dogs out in private to them to make them supporters.
Manos is an Upotte fan?you are whatever the gun version of a furry is.
I've said it before, but Manos is just the lovable neighborhood gun nut, but he caucuses with the Dems.
I never accused you of yiffing!No, since I beleive sticking ones dick into the action of an M1 Garand is not advisable.
So Romney supports busing.
No, since I beleive sticking ones dick into the action of an M1 Garand is not advisable.
No, that would be analogous to bestiality. Here the gun has to be anthropomorphized to some extent.No, since I beleive sticking ones dick into the action of an M1 Garand is not advisable.
I'd have to change my vote if that were true!Oh please Mitt was clearly singing Da Mystery of Chessboxin.
No, that would be analogous to bestiality. Here the gun has to be anthropomorphized to some extent.
So? He has to keep them locked. Lots of FFL 01 operate in the garage. What's wrong with it? It's not like they are going to get loose and bite you. Would you like links on the requirements they have to follow and rules books from the ATF? I can provide them.The guy across the street is trying to start an online gun store out of his house. Got a letter from that asshole about some public hearing he has to notify me of. He has a trailer in his driveway full of fucking guns. NOT SO LOVABLE.
Have never seen fill episodes, but seen the thread and some clips. A bit too esoteric for my tastes (outside the info clips), Black Lagoon is my standby.Manos is an Upotte fan?
Gives Garand Thumb a whole new meaning.*Ping!*
No, that would be analogous to bestiality. Here the gun has to be anthropomorphized to some extent.
A gun with eyes would be some type of Lovecraftian revolver.Like so?
Eh still don't think I naming your gun is a good idea unless as a joke.No, that would be analogous to bestiality. Here the gun has to be anthropomorphized to some extent.
I'd pay money to see it....fuck that him and Herman Cain doing stuff from Cuban Linx 1! Mitt is Ghostface and Cain is Rae!I'd have to change my vote if that were true!
Jerks off...Ping! lolThat or he dresses up as a Garand.
The guy across the street is trying to start an online gun store out of his house. Got a letter from that asshole about some public hearing he has to notify me of. He has a trailer in his driveway full of fucking guns. NOT SO LOVABLE.
More.Like so?
No, I mean it would have to be humanoid.... somehow. I dunno how it would work exactly. That's your job to figure out!Eh still don't think I naming your gun is a good idea unless as a joke.
Sigh, I doubt that's the case ATF is not giving an FFL 1 to a guy who will store his guns in his truck...is the thread now going to be Manos teaches about the FFL processs? Get Villix in here he is one...also owns machine guns.A trailer? Nice. Some guy is going to show up at 3 am with a trailer hitch and drive away with an armory.
That or he dresses up as a Garand.
Sigh, I doubt that's the case ATF is not giving an FFL 1 to a guy who will store his guns in his truck...is the thread now going to be Manos teaches about the FFL processs? Get Villix in here he is one...also owns machine guns.
I leave it to the experts in the area to decide that.More.
No, I mean it would have to be humanoid.... somehow. I dunno how it would work exactly. That's your job to figure out!
Except that isn't part of his plan to sell guns. Oh god I am really going to explain the FFL process.He said trailer full of guns. Bring a truck with a trailer hitch and haul it away. What a great way to facilitate theft.
Important Notice to Applicants for Federal Firearms License (FFL)
To receive a license as a dealer (including pawnbrokers & gunsmiths), importer, or manufacturer of firearms, you must intend to engage in a firearms business.
You can expect to be contacted by an ATF officer during the application process.
You will be required to prepare and keep detailed records of all firearms transactions.
Your records and premises will be subject to inspection by ATF officers.
ATF notifies State and local authorities regarding applicants for Federal firearms licenses.
State laws or local ordinances may require additional licenses or permits for firearms licenses.
Other State or local requirements, such as cash bonds, liability insurance, zoning restrictions, collection of sales taxes, etc., may also apply to your proposed firearms business. You should contact your State and local authorities for specific information on their requirements.
Firearms licensees should contact the Internal Revenue Service for information regarding business operations and Federal income taxes.
When requested by ATF, licensees are required to furnish information regarding firearms traces.
Manufacturer Applicants
I'm only familiar with humanized animals. *shrug*I leave it to the experts in the area to decide that.
Yeah, but I am the same way with NASA in terms of really really really liking it, so it's just when I care about something I really care about it lol. I mean shotguns and space exploration are aweome. Also Dems and guns aren't that weird in certain areas, it's often rural areas vs urban though.Manos is a centrist Democrat who really really really really likes guns. Which I think is a bit weird but at the same time I'm kind of c'est la vie on gun control so I can't pretend to be an expert on it or particularly passionate about it. Also I fired a shotgun at some clay pigeons when I was eleven and it was pretty cool.
Yeah, it's mostly just an exercise in trying to oppose it...though in principal the idea of groups acting with pooled resources to carry more influence seems fine...granted possible maxed out so the gap can't be silly.Your CU position is silly though--just because there's a ceiling to its influence given an incompetent enough candidate doesn't mean it's anything close to harmless, much less a good idea.
If money is speech, then some people have more speech than others.Yeah, it's mostly just an exercise in trying to oppose it...though in principal the idea of groups acting with pooled resources to carry more influence seems fine...granted possible maxed out so the gap can't be silly.
Can't you say that If they have more supporters at a rally than another. Also what about a persecuted minority or view holder (gay marriage propoents that needs to level the playing field with access and reaching people than supporters can reach individually?If money is speech, then some people have more speech than others.
Except that isn't part of his plan to sell guns. Oh god I am really going to explain the FFL process.
http://www.atf.gov/firearms/how-to/become-an-ffl.html
Read
http://www.atf.gov/forms/download/atf-f-5310-12-notice.html
Can't you say that If they have more supporters at a rally than another. Also what about a persecuted minority or view holder (gay marriage propoents that needs to level the playing field with access and reaching people than supporters can reach individually?
One person, one vote.Can't you say that If they have more supporters at a rally than another.
I mean, I'm sure he's allowed to do this if his hearing approves it. We just have enough gun violence in New Orleans that I'm not stoked about a trailer and garage full of god-knows-what right across the street. And he's not even a Democrat, so he's not covered under your same lovability agreement.
You have to understand that they have to be locked up and the hearing is not approval, the ATF has to approve it, he just has to also comply with local rules too.I mean, I'm sure he's allowed to do this if his hearing approves it. We just have enough gun violence in New Orleans that I'm not stoked about a trailer and garage full of god-knows-what right across the street. And he's not even a Democrat, so he's not subject to your same lovability agreement.
Well, mechanics of the electoral college and congressional representation aside...Well, except in Presidential elections.
Which they can...but the requirements for storage are still there. Now if you feel the same with any business that's fine, most garbage or kitchen ffls have no noticeable footprint of their operations.I just read your thing and that can't be good for property values. I'm all for his right to do it, but I'm also for his neighbors objecting especially if there are a lot of kids on the block.
Right, but how do you differentiate the two? Also lots of groups of people struggling use non profit corporate status. Don't you have to be content neutral? How can you get around that and not be regulating on content?The first one is kinda of a bad example, the second however I think we can all agree that people struggling for their rights are different than companies and rich people trying to get their taxes lowered.
You have to understand that they have to be locked up and the hearing is not approval, the ATF has to approve it, he just has to also comply with local rules too.
Also he most likely will only be doing transfers: person orders gun from FFL, he needs another FFL to receive it (barring a C&R like me, but that's only certain guns...but I can get a CZ-82 in the mail with no background check or transfer needed), ffls exchange licenses, gun comes in, he does NICS check and paperwork, and collects a fee. The guns he keeps are his own more likely than not, and not product.
That's fine just as long as you don't think he can just store product (if he even keeps any) in the trailer. He most liked wants to make side money...and get stuff shipped with no transfer needed (but you can have that as the primary reason). Plus ATF will inspect his facility and audit him regularly.I can understand it and still not like it all that much. Or at all
Funny I actually got a postcard psa about the voter Id law. Can scan it if anyone is interested.
Funny I actually got a postcard psa about the voter Id law. Can scan it if anyone is interested.
Oh for me I'm using my conceal carry licence!
Right, but how do you differentiate the two? Also lots of groups of people struggling use non profit corporate status. Don't you have to be content neutral? How can you get around that and not be regulating on content?
Yes I did, I woud love it! Plus the idea of Philly not dragging their feet even though PA is shall issue, would be hillarious to see. Even more so the poor and minorities are getting licence to carry firearms (LTCF) would be hillarious to watch sink in.Weren't you the one saying the dems should start getting people to get conceal carry licenses and using that? That would have been funny as shit to see the reaction to.
But it can protect those who might be threatened or presumed to be something or having something based on donations. Anonymous political speech is an important protection. Say you donate for gay marriage, gun rights, or abortion and your company doesn't like that, you donating can cause a lot of problems, if they cant find out unless you or someone from the group says, that's a good thing. I agree about the excess end, but the principles seem worth protecting, even with the other end of the spectrum.That's the thing. Honestly I think the fact that superPACs don't have to disclose their donors is the problem, or at least most of it. We've basically got a series of groups who have millions of dollars and don't have to say who is donating it. I mean we can sort of figure it out but if they wanted to it could be denied. Make them disclose their donors at the end of each month and maybe they aren't allowed to make attack ads (limit them to issue ads that can't mention either candidate) and most of my problems with them are fixed.
But it can protect those who might be threatened or presumed to be something or having something based on donations. Anonymous political speech is an important protection. Say you donate for gay marriage, gun rights, or abortion and your company doesn't like that, you donating can cause a lot of problems, if they cant find out unless you or someone from the group says, that's a good thing. I agree about the excess end, but the principles seem worth protecting, even with the other end of the spectrum.