Joe Biden is indeed a luscious fox, but I think Hillary fits the part better.
David Plouffe would be Lucious Fox.
Joe Biden is indeed a luscious fox, but I think Hillary fits the part better.
David Plouffe would be Lucious Fox.
Why are we talking about SuperPacs and Citizen's United like it's something that can be fixed by Congress? The Supreme Court is the only real avenue to change it because a constitutional amendment is never going to happen in modern America.
One
Bastard
Against
Mining
Americans
Meh, that is not much of a threat.Feel free to give the Secret Service office KY a call. Some scum with a bumper sticker saying the President should be lynched deserve the visit.
http://www.secretservice.gov/field_offices.shtml#k
tnr said:Consider the “media” polls that have received scrutiny over the last few weeks. With the exception of Fox News surveys that appear to push independent voters, there are fewer Democrats than there were four years ago. So how are Democrats retaining a large advantage in party-ID? Because fewer voters are describing themselves as Republican, as well. Instead, voters are flocking into the “independent” column.
Could this be true? Sure. After all, the Republican Party hasn’t really made a positive case for itself over the past four years, and the Republican nominee hasn’t even really made a case for himself, let alone the party. Put it this way: the Republican Party is not popular, the Republican Congress is not popular, and the Republican nominee is not popular; so how could anyone be especially surprised if a couple points worth of Republican leaners have now decided to characterize themselves as “independents.”
Is there any evidence to support this hypothesis? Yes, although it's not perfect. Some polls ask independent voters whether they lean toward Democrats or Republicans, and recent polls suggest that more independents lean toward Republicans than Democrats. In the Bloomberg survey, the initial Democratic advantage of 6 points dwindles to just 2 points once leaners are added, while the NBC/WSJ poll shows the Democratic advantage narrowing by 2 points after adding leaners. A similar pattern was seen in the Battleground survey, which found that more voters say they vote for a few more Republicans than Democrats. Nonetheless, the balance of evidence seems to be consistent with the possibility that a larger number of Republicans are calling themselves independents than Democrats, at least at the moment.
tnr said:A month ago, Obama was down 13 points in Florida among people 65 and older; today he’s up 4. On the specific question of Medicare, Obama was down 4 points among Florida seniors in August; today he’s up 5 points. (The Quinnipiac Poll re-shuffled its age-groups between August and September, so you won’t be make apples-to-apples comparisons by eyeballing their crosstabs. But the super-kind people at Quinnipiac re-reshuffled them for me.)
I like...still he'd shit him self stupid most likely from a Secret Service visit.Meh, that is not much of a threat.
But he should be reported to the DMV for not having a license plate.
Scalia will be shutting himself via machine and brain dead and will require Congress or some legal measure to remove him.Maybe Scalia will have a heart attack within the next four years.
That ones not really that bad and could be done for any Pres...well Bush more than Cinton.Saw a decal on an F-150 earlier today that read:
Nate Cohn explains that the party ID differential is not due to 2008 levels of enthusiasm among Democrats, but rather Republican leaners switching to self-identifying as independents.
http://www.tnr.com/blog/electionate/107813/no-the-polls-arent-oversampling-democrats
He would first need to have a heart.Maybe Scalia will have a heart attack within the next four years.
Holy shit the first debate is next week.
TiVo. It's not worth messing with the schedule or taking a vacation day for. Besides I thought you did design work, can't you stream it or at least just for a liveblog with updates from it?And I get to miss it
All this hype only to realize the debate is on a Wednesday, my late working night. Ugh.
Holy shit the first debate is next week.
LOL
Wait, would it really be Obama though? Hmm who is the Lucious Fox of the Obama Administration?
I am too nervous/scared to watch the debates. I'll just be catching the live PoliGAF commentary as it happens--which I find more entertaining and less stressful
That said what if by some odd stroke of luck, he really does, and gives a commanding performance (humor me) what type of effect could it have on poll numbers?The thing about the debates is that Romney is definitely going to have a case of nerves out there, he's never been under this much pressure in his life. His advisers keep saying that he does better with his back against the wall but I don't know. He doesn't seem that resilient. Obama can probably fluster him.
He's going to be just as loose with the facts and the constant changing of positions as he has in his entire campaign and it won't be too hard fro Obama to call him on it again and again and again.Am I the only one who thinks Romney might not do a bad job at the debates?
Am I the only one who thinks Romney might not do a bad job at the debates?
Reading PoliGAF will probably be more stressful; people freak the fuck out over the smallest thing here like it will cause Romney to win with 400+ EVs.
Could Obama get a question though where he might have to address something he doesn't want to, that might make him look bad, just because while right even it's massively unpopular?He's going to be just as loose with the facts and the constant changing of positions as he has in his entire campaign and it won't be too hard fro Obama to call him on it again and again and again.
obama's going to flail around like the t1000 at the end of terminator 2 without his teleprompter. romney's going to destroy him.
It was a good troll thoughIs everyone trying to play the troll game now?
He'll do alright. He's a smart guy. He'll memorize a lot of talking points and spew them out.Am I the only one who thinks Romney might not do a bad job at the debates?
Take a shot whenever Obama says 'uh', 'look', or 'make no mistake'.Reading PoliGAF will probably be more stressful; people freak the fuck out over the smallest thing here like it will cause Romney to win with 400+ EVs.
Is everyone trying to play the troll game now?
I have the Deluxe Digital Edition that came with a free hat in Team Fortress 2.Oblivion for sure.
I think Romney's taken it too personally now. Much like with McCain back in 08, I think there's a part of Romney that can't believe he's losing to him.He'll do alright. He's a smart guy. He'll memorize a lot of talking points and spew them out.
But he'll be Rombot. That laugh. At least one or two things that us commoners wouldn't say.
TiVo. It's not worth messing with the schedule or taking a vacation day for. Besides I thought you did design work, can't you stream it or at least just for a liveblog with updates from it?
That said what if by some odd stroke of luck, he really does, and gives a commanding performance (humor me) what type of effect could it have on poll numbers?
Okay serious prediction time for the debates. I think both candidates will do well. However I think Romney will be perceived as the winner but not in dominant fashion. I think this because I don't think Romney will actually trip and fall, he will have some good, prepared one-liners, and the media need to keep him in the race for ratings sake. However acute political observers will note that while Romney's debate performance is good or acceptable it will not influence polls or change voters' minds on him.
To change voters' minds he doesn't need to attack the President, he needs an authentic, human moment. I don't think he's capable of that.
Okay serious prediction time for the debates. I think both candidates will do well. However I think Romney will be perceived as the winner but not in dominant fashion. I think this because I don't think Romney will actually trip and fall, he will have some good, prepared one-liners, and the media need to keep him in the race for ratings sake. However acute political observers will note that while Romney's debate performance is good or acceptable it will not influence polls or change voters' minds on him.
To change voters' minds he doesn't need to attack the President, he needs an authentic, human moment. I don't think he's capable of that.
That said what if by some odd stroke of luck, he really does, and gives a commanding performance (humor me) what type of effect could it have on poll numbers?
Could Obama get a question though where he might have to address something he doesn't want to, that might make him look bad, just because while right even it's massively unpopular?
I am pretty sure Romney is going to use the first debate now to try to soften his image; I expect things like 'Obama is a nice guy, but his policies have clearly failed. I have a plan to ensure that the middle class actually prospers. Under Obama, the median income for Americans has shrunk dramatically. Is this the kind of recovery he promised? He meant well, but it's time for a change.'
I don't think he'll be harsh at all, because of how high his negatives are. If they go any higher he'll basically be as radioactive as uranium.
If Romney makes a really good showing in the debates I think he'll pick up three points or so, but I don't think it'll really put him back in contention.
Romney would need a miracle for 3 points, he could not even muster 2 for HIS convention lol
That said what if by some odd stroke of luck, he really does, and gives a commanding performance (humor me) what type of effect could it have on poll numbers?