I'll say one thing I didn't know back when we thought this was that Obama would be getting so much better deals on advertising than the superpacs which has negated any monetary advantage they might have had.
If you say you're rebooting, you're admitting you're losing.
Wow. It's almost like a cruel twist on the "You're not putting out the fire fast enough!" meme. But then you realize he's completely serious.
I never thought I see the day when an establishment Republican praise Hillary.
You can't stop Sununu, you can only hope to contain him.
sc2 gaf=best gaf
``Yeah, I feel it too. Dems are getting really cocky, talking like the race is already over, and I think it's a mistake to be so overconfident.
Muhammad wasn't a pedophile, and you can incite a mob with those comments. Now kindly stfu.
There's a difference between being a realist and being all doom and gloom. That you would ignore the fact that I admitted most signs are pointing to an Obama win would mean you are just taking comfort in denouncing anyone who's not ignorant enough realize this is far from over. I'm not closed-minded enough to think there's absolutely no way Mitt can bounce back. If he performs better than expected in a debate or two, and makes Obama look bad, he's on his way to getting in better standing with undecided voters. Really, Obama should be in much more serious trouble given UE/GDP, but he's not. Which means he's damn lucky, and it also means if Obama falls off course, Mitt really would have a shot of regaining enough cred with voters to make election night a nailbiter.
Yep, it's getting tighter... and this is pre-debate.
PPP is a very credible and reliable source, though.