Frank the Great
Banned
GOP is going to get quieter and quieter on healthcare as the new year progresses and the law is a success.
I hope the base rebels.
I hope the base rebels.
GOP is going to get quieter and quieter on healthcare as the new year progresses and the law is a success.
I hope the base rebels.
Fuuuuuuuck, best case scenario. My guess? The base forgets about it.
The base has been screaming about Obamacare since the summer of 2009. Almost five years of rabid hysteria. There's no way they forget about it.
The best combination for the Democrats going into 2014 is for a) the conservative base to be thoroughly disgusted with their congressmen for surrendering on Obamacare and the budget, to a point where they don't show or actively sabotage their campaigns, b) independents to turn away from the GOP after having enough of their antics, and c) Democrats to show up at the polls.
Incidentally that third one will probably be the hardest.
Independents in presidential years tend to be the ones who don't care about politics and more likely to play the "BOTH SIDES ARE EQUALLY BAD" game, so yeah.Hmm, yeah, I guess in a non-presidential election, it would be.
In a presidential year, I'd say (B) might be the hardest.
Hmm, yeah, I guess in a non-presidential election, it would be.
In a presidential year, I'd say (B) might be the hardest.
Was this posted?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2013/12/18/the-gop-repeal-trap/
I said goddamn!
At the end of the day, the exchanges are still behind their sign up target and multiple states continue to have big problems (Maryland, Oregon, DC, etc). Meanwhile for every positive story, someone can easily find a bad/horrible one. And in states that didn't set up exchanges or accept Medicaid, many people are being trapped by expensive plans with no alternative (NC, Texas, etc); I doubt most people in those states are going to blame their governors for screwing them - they're going to blame the law.
Things are getting better, the numbers look good, but the law isn't out of the woods yet. The majority of people remain opposed to the law. By April it'll be easier to determine how things are going to shake out IMO.
The GOP plan will eventually move to fixing the law, ie making it worse. Adding the ability to purchase plans across state lines for instance.
In a recent non-scientific survey, Andrew Steinmetz, Ralph Muller, Steven Altschuler, and Ezekiel Emanuel of HealthAffiars.org asked 74 C-Suite (i.e. COO, CEO, CFO) executives from hospitals how they believed Obamacre would affect their hospital. An incredible 93% believed it would not only make the health care system better than it is today, they also believed it would lower the cost of care across the board.
Fully 65 percent indicated that by 2020, they believe the healthcare system as a whole will be somewhat or significantly better than it is today. And when they were asked about their own institutions, the optimism was even more dramatic. Fully 93 percent predicted that the quality of care provided by their own health system would improve. This is probably related to efforts to diminish hospital acquired conditions, medication errors, and unnecessary re-admissions, as encouraged by financial penalties in the ACA.
Well, plurality.Things are getting better, the numbers look good, but the law isn't out of the woods yet. The majority of people remain opposed to the law. By April it'll be easier to determine how things are going to shake out IMO.
Online snafus aside, a new ABC News/Washington Post poll finds that Americans divide about evenly on the law itself, 46-49 percent near its average since the law was passed, and in fact a slightly less negative assessment than a month ago. Moreover, two-thirds either support the law outright or are willing to let it proceed and see how it works, vs. one-third who favor its repeal.
Adding salt to the WOUND.
I almost feel bad for the GOP
Utah. Is. Blue.
UTAH IS FUCKING BLUE!!!
The faith is inseperably bound to an organization that has spent all kinds of resources to the detriment of gays and lesbians. Not all mormons are as lockstep as the organization would like, of course, and so calling out followers isn't as appropriate, but calling out the church itself is entirely appropriate.Seriously, don't understand this.
There are many Mormons who support gay rights, Harry Reid and Udall just in the senate. Attacking the faith is really stupid. Its best not to stoop to that level attack hateful and bigoted ideas.
THERE IS NO STAY
hahahahahahhahah
hahahahha
YOUR CONSERVATIVE TEARS FEED ME
Ohio banning gay marriage is surprising, since Columbus has one of the largest gay populations in the country. Like top 5 largest.
Of course Columbus is liberal as hell. That's what happens when you have several colleges in one city.
Yeah, like I said he'd have to get to Dubya levels (complete trainwreck) if his Presidency is to get any more dire. I think 2014 will be a better year for him.Obama hasn't fucked up on a catastrophic level the way Dubya did, where everyone admitted he was a failure. Obama's always going to have at least 40% of the country behind him until something like Katrina or the recession happens under his watch.
Why? They won't feel bad for themselves the first chance they have to get their hands on the law and mangle it.Adding salt to the WOUND.
I almost feel bad for the GOP
Ohio banning gay marriage is surprising, since Columbus has one of the largest gay populations in the country. Like top 5 largest.
Of course Columbus is liberal as hell. That's what happens when you have several colleges in one city.
Isn't Sasha a Russian name anyway?
Most of the time when a person's real name is "Natasha," the shortened form is "Tasha." Perhaps her little sister at the time found it difficult to say "Natasha" and called her "Sasha" and the name stuck.
Is this supposed to mean that Obama's secretly Russian? If so, why is he not attending the Olympics?
Is this supposed to mean that Obama's secretly Russian? If so, why is he not attending the Olympics?
God damn.This is brilliant
The pro-Obamacare (probamacare) picture is perfect for their target audience. I imagine that boy's fashion represents everything diehard conservatives hate.This is brilliant
I missed the whole man in pajamas thing. Can anyone explain?
Looks comfy to meIt represents everything that everyone hates. ;p
Looks comfy to me
Looks comfy to me
If I don't have any pockets for my smartphone, how else am I gonna know what time it is?
Looks comfy to me
If I entered a room and that person, dressed that way, asked if I wanted to talk about healthcare, I'd turn and run the fuck away. Regardless if I knew him or not. Has serial killer written all over him.
Yes, nickname for Alexander/ Alexandra.Isn't Sasha a Russian name anyway?
It's my way of saying, hey, I enjoy sleeping as much as the next guy, but I'll at least be professional about it.You'd wear a watch in PJ's?
You know if you just wanted me to leave your living room all you had to do was say it.If I entered a room and that person, dressed that way, asked if I wanted to talk about healthcare, I'd turn and run the fuck away. Regardless if I knew him or not. Has serial killer written all over him.
Then he wouldn't be "that person".What if it was Morgan Freeman dressed that way?
And he talked to you in his godly voice?
It's my way of saying, hey, I enjoy sleeping as much as the next guy, but I'll at least be professional about it.
You know if you just wanted me to leave your living room all you had to do was say it.
I thought they were mine! They fit so perfectly...Next time don't put on my pajamas without asking, k?