http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2014/senate/ia/iowa_senate_ernst_vs_braley-3990.htmlMight as well chalk Iowa up as a democrat loss now.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2014/senate/ia/iowa_senate_ernst_vs_braley-3990.html
You wanna add that to our bet?
So whoever gets 2 out of 3 gets to change the other guy's avatar or is it an all-or-nothing deal?Yup, add that on. I'm feeling down about Arkansas but I'm 100% confident in NC, and the more I read about Ernst the worse I feel about the democrat's chances.
Yup, add that on. I'm feeling down about Arkansas but I'm 100% confident in NC, and the more I read about Ernst the worse I feel about the democrat's chances.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2014/senate/ia/iowa_senate_ernst_vs_braley-3990.html
You wanna add that to our bet?
the new EPA stuff today? Has anybody?
McDaniel just over 50%. This is crazy. 84% in.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/379293/epa-super-legislature-editors
http://www.nationalreview.com/planet-gore/379328/early-epa-round-greg-pollowitz
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/379395/ongoing-war-coal-robert-bryce
http://hotair.com/archives/2014/06/...new-emissions-regulations-dont-nix-the-nukes/
*wink*onshore wind, ... hydropower ... Stop using 18th century energy in the 21st century. FFS.
Why does he have a taliban beard if he isn't a taliban sympathizer? You tell me that. I wanna be on fox and friends
Spin spin spin.
Sure seems like this AWOL dude was an agent for Taliban and so is his dad. Both are under protection of Obama over objection from State.
CIA Station Chief did not make it through the swap before being outed by the Whtie House. Must be that the CIA objected.
CIA Station Chief did not make it through the swap before being outed by the White House. Must be that the CIA objected.
^^^ THIS^^^
Was no "accident". That was a deliberate WARNING to anyone in the know about this 'deal' to keep mouth shut or you will end up DEAD - because we will turn your ass over to the Jihadists for killing. Remember Stevens?
THAT is the message here.
When are Americans going to wake up that we have a Trojan Horse that is subjugating the country to our enemies??? That he has performed a MarxoFascist coup?
When??? Are this many people clueless about what is about to happen to us?
*wink*
It'll go into a runoff but I can't imagine how Cochran can win. I would imagine the winner in this first round would have a base that's much more fired up to make sure he's the nominee.Am I supposed to be sad that the Tea Partier may win?
I'm happy. Let the crazies win. That will merely discredit the GOP.
Haha, oh wow. She was NOT expecting that.Pelosi is a mess answering a student reporter's question regarding the NSA.
The thirty day notification isn't the only requirement for releasing detainees from gitmo.
This is the only issue that people are calling this an unlawful move, and a huge overreach of executive power.
There's is a massive list of things needed before a transfer of detainees can happen. None of which anyone is complaining about. This is the reason the administration can't just "let everyone go".
Breaking "the law" in this case refers to the 1035 section of the NDAA, and it amounts to saying that you didn't pay your taxes because your post mark was a seconds off on april 15th at midnight.
The Secretary of Defense apparently has provided everything needed to allow for this exchange to happen. If they hadn't we wouldn't be hearing about the inane thirty day clause. We'd be hearing about a whole torrent of other shitty things about these prisoners.
Well sure, there's plenty of money coming from all sorts of places. Who knows which position you'll need to take.Just like the debt ceiling, a president's position on issues will change once they come into office. Not because of hypocrisy, but because of the reality how this government operates.
Haha, oh wow. She was NOT expecting that.
The whole point was that the executive would need to communicate with the legislative 30 days before this kind of thing happened. As much as we want to dance around it, that's the crux of the issue. I think we all agree that Obama broke the law, because I haven't really seen any argument otherwise... just that some people think it's not a big deal for one reason or another.
Id like to explain why, given the credible reports regarding the risk of grave harm to Sergeant Bergdahl and the rapidly unfolding events surrounding his recovery, it was lawful for the Administration to proceed with the transfer notwithstanding the notice requirement in Section 1035(d) of the FY14 NDAA.
First, there is no question that the Secretary made the determinations required to transfer the detainees under Section 1035(b) of the FY 2014 NDAA. Section 1035(b) states that the Secretary of Defense may transfer an individual detained at Guantanamo to a foreign country if the Secretary determines (1) that actions have or will be taken that substantially mitigate the risk that the individual will engage in activity that threatens the United States or U.S. persons or interests and (2) that the transfer is in the national security interest of the United States. The Secretary made those determinations.
With respect to the separate 30-day notification requirement in Section 1035(d), the Administration determined that the notification requirement should be construed not to apply to this unique set of circumstances, in which the transfer would secure the release of a captive U.S. soldier and the Secretary of Defense, acting on behalf of the President, has determined that providing notice as specified in the statute could endanger the soldiers life.
In these circumstances, delaying the transfer in order to provide the 30-day notice would interfere with the Executives performance of two related functions that the Constitution assigns to the President: protecting the lives of Americans abroad and protecting U.S. soldiers. Because such interference would significantly alter the balance between Congress and the President, and could even raise constitutional concerns, we believe it is fair to conclude that Congress did not intend that the Administration would be barred from taking the action it did in these circumstances.
The President also has repeatedly expressed concerns regarding this notice requirement. For example, the Presidents FY14 NDAA signing statement indicated that Section 1035 does not, however, eliminate all of the unwarranted limitations on foreign transfers and, in certain circumstances, would violate constitutional separation of powers principles. The executive branch must have the flexibility, among other things, to act swiftly in conducting negotiations with foreign countries regarding the circumstances of detainee transfers. To the extent that the notice provision would apply in these unique circumstances, it would trigger the very separation of powers concerns that the President raised in his signing statement.
In these unique circumstances, in which the Secretary of Defense made the determinations required by Section 1035(b) and in light of the Secretarys assessment that providing notice as specified in Section 1035(d) could endanger the soldiers life, the Secretary of Defenses failure to provide 30 days notice under Section 1035(d) was lawful.
Congressmen have said the briefing the WH gave showed no evidence his life was in grave danger.
Congressmen have said the briefing the WH gave showed no evidence his life was in grave danger.
Congressmen have said the briefing the WH gave showed no evidence his life was in grave danger.
I dunno why I read this in Grima Wormtongue's voiceAlso disgusting is the talk, especially on FOX, about his father. Absolutely uncalled for.
Link.
Politics in this country is becoming such a drag and predictable.
If Obama does anything, then commence right wing freakout.
End program.
1865 was the year of the invention of the hover car, but it the inventor out maneuvered in the market by Charles Goodyear's stranglehold on the rubber industry who spent a shit load of cash to paint them as dangerous and unreliable compared to cars that used his less expensive tires.Why does the car have no wheels?
I think that was referring to his health condition only. Or the allegations that he was in deteriorating health conditions.
His life can be considered in danger simply for being a POW though. We have seen plenty of POW executions over the years. To argue he was safe and sound with a terrorist group we have warred with for a decade is something I would like to see argued by any congressman.
Fox News regular Keith Ablow speculated on Wednesday morning that President Obama orchestrated the release of U.S. Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl in exchange for five Taliban prisoners being held at Guantanamo Bay because the commander-in-chief “doesn’t affiliate with patriotism” and “wants out of America.”
“Barack Obama does not have the will of the American people, Americanism in his soul,” Ablow, a forensic psychiatrist who is part of the Fox News Medical A-Team, explained. “And this swap, somebody who may not feel very American for five people who definitely don’t, is symptomatic of that.”
The Secret Service is purchasing software to watch users of social networks in real time, according to contract documents.
In a work order posted on Monday, the agency details information the tool will collect -- ranging from emotions of Internet users to old Twitter messages.
Its capabilities will include sentiment analysis, "influencer identification," "access to historical Twitter data," ability to detect sarcasm," and "heat maps" or graphics showing user trends by color intensity, agency officials said.
At least their public rhetoric does not match the facts on the ground, he said. This notion that it was an acute health care yesterday, we were informed that it wasnt acute, they had no information that it was acute, I dont know why you would say that. They said we had to work within a few days of notice we understand that this happened weeks ago.
http://www.politico.com/story/2014/...e-2011-barack-obama-107360.html#ixzz33g9QCSpr
WASHINGTON (AP) — More than 2 million people who got health insurance under President Barack Obama's law have data discrepancies that could jeopardize coverage for some, a government document shows.
About 1 in 4 people who signed up have discrepancies, creating a huge paperwork jam for the feds and exposing some consumers to repayment demands, or possibly even loss of coverage, if they got too generous a subsidy.
The 7-page slide presentation from the Health and Human Services department was provided to The Associated Press as several congressional committees are actively investigating the discrepancies, most of which involve important details on income, citizenship and immigration status.
Ensuring that health care benefits are delivered accurately is a top priority for HHS nominee Sylvia Mathews Burwell, whose confirmation as department secretary is before the Senate this week.
Responding to the document, administration officials expressed confidence that most of the discrepancies can be resolved over the summer. Nonetheless, HHS has set up a system to "turn off" benefits for anyone who is found to be ineligible.
Julie Bataille, communications coordinator for the health care rollout, said most of the discrepancies appear to be due to outdated information in government files — and the "vast majority" of cases are being resolved in favor of consumers. The government is making an all-out effort to reach those with discrepancies, which officials have termed "inconsistencies."
"The fact that a consumer has an inconsistency on their application does not mean there is a problem on their enrollment," said Bataille. "Most of the time what that means is that there is more up-to-date information that they need to provide to us."
The document provided to AP said that 2.1 million people enrolled through the new health insurance exchanges were "affected by one or more inconsistency" as of the end of April.
The exchanges offer subsidized private coverage to lower-income and middle-class people with no access to health care on the job. The sliding-scale subsidies are based on income and family size, and are also affected by where a person lives. Because they are structured as tax credits, the Internal Revenue Service can deduct any overpayments from a taxpayer's refund the following year.
Under the law, only citizens and legal immigrants are entitled to subsidized coverage.
Updated numbers provided by Bataille indicate that the total number of people affected remains about the same as a month ago. About 1.2 million have discrepancies related to income; 505,000 have issues with immigration data, and 461,000 have conflicts related to citizenship information.
WASHINGTON -- Ryan Zinke, a former Navy SEAL and state senator who is now running for Congress in Montana, said during a campaign stop this week that he is worried the country is losing sight of the real threat to the nation: Hillary Clinton.
We need to focus on the real enemy, said Zinke last week, referring to Clinton, according to the Bigfork Eagle. He also called the former Secretary of State the "anti-Christ."
Zinke is one of a handful of Republicans trying to succeed Rep. Steve Daines (R-Mont.), who is expected to run for the seat being vacated by Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.).
maureen dowd is now getting stoned and writing her columns. literally. this actually happened
krugman's upcoming coked out column and brook's opium piece will be great
did the times pay for the drugs?
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/04/o...-dude.html?smid=tw-NYTimesDowd&seid=auto&_r=0
This is amazing. It inspired this: Friedman's Bad Trip (read top-to-bottom)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/31/ryan-zinke_n_4702765.html?ncid=txtlnkushpmg00000037
Yeesh. Wonder if Democrats could win this one.
I will say that I signed up for insurance through the marketplace in February, and it has been a most unpleasant experience. Technically, I should be on Medicaid, but Idaho is fucking stupid, so that's not an option. After I signed up, I was required to submit proof of my citizenship. Because I'm currently unemployed but making some money from working at home, I qualify for a large subsidy. So, I had to submit a proof of income for that. I uploaded a scan of my birth certificate and uploaded a copy of my recent bank statement for both of those.Websitegate has returned!
APNewsBreak: Data discrepancies in health sign-ups
Obummer cooked the numbers. Illegals signed up. Obamacare fails. Premiums to skyrocket tomorrow. Impeach! Impeach! Impeach!
But, no. The immigration status hiccup is a bit of a problem. The income numbers can just be verified via the IRS... oh wait...
SCANDAL SCANDAL SCANDAL
Wow, you don't even need one of those to become President.I now have to mail a copy of my birth certificate! I already uploaded it! Nope, not good enough. Have to mail it, or in 30 days I'll lose my coverage.
Modi is promising electric light to everyone in India . . . but he is not going to do it with a grid. He is going to do it with Solar PV, batteries, and LED lighting.
I think that was referring to his health condition only. Or the allegations that he was in deteriorating health conditions.
His life can be considered in danger simply for being a POW though. We have seen plenty of POW executions over the years. To argue he was safe and sound with a terrorist group we have warred with for a decade is something I would like to see argued by any congressman.