I'm saying due to politicians catering to the interests of private companies, healthcare is not a human right, and therefore people die/suffer unnecessarily.
And ...that's a bad thing, which cannot be changed anytime soon because it's almost impossible to out compete them at the voting booth when bribery is legal. And that leads to hopelessness/despair as ordinary people's votes + no money are worth less than a wealthy person's vote + lots of money. This isn't controversial dude lol.
None of this is controversial (at least on NeoGAF). The part where you go from there to the people having a right to kill the politicians in question is where a lot of the arguments seem to be coming from.
I say this as somebody who does basically support the right of distressed people to break the law if doing so serves human rights. For example, if somebody were hypothetically turning off water to a bunch of desperate people*, I would support those people acting to take that water back, even if it meant violating property rights to do so. But I wouldn't support them hunting down and killing the people responsible for making the decision to turn off the water! Even if that guy is arguably a terrible human being, it doesn't mean killing him is appropriate.
* I don't actually know anything about the water situation in Detroit, but it's a good test case.