That Cain=>Gingrich=>Santorum combo was all sorts of magical.Remember when Herman Cain was the flavor of the month? And I believe it was Gingrich after. Maybe the two are flip-flopped. I don't remember that closely.
Ultimately the GOP put a more moderate Romney forward. I think that was probably smart even though they lost.
PPP has Feingold leading Johnson 50-41, good lord.
Validation of my 2010 optimism is all I seek.
So RCP now has Walker leading the GOP field in Iowa (+8) and in New Hampshire (+0.8). We need more polls, but woo wee.
The petition is close to 200k signatures...wow. I didn't even expect it to overtake the Snowden petition which was the #1 most popular petition for a long time. Although completely useless in its goals, it does add to the widespread condemnation that's going on.
Let's take a moment to appreciate what an amazingly glorious of a choke-job this game was.Chelsea was playing PSG today and this guy never not talks about the Champion's League. It was fucking surreal.
Graham wants to use the military to prevent defense budget cuts lololol
Lindsey Graham said:And here's the first thing I would do if I were president of the United States. I wouldn't let Congress leave town until we fix this. I would literally use the military to keep them in if I had to. We're not leaving town until we restore these defense cuts. We are not leaving town until we restore the intel cuts.
Let's take a moment to appreciate what an amazingly glorious of a choke-job this game was.
SoGood.gif
God damn, I knew he was crazy, but man, this is really freaking crazy.
I still can't believe such a choke-job actually happened. I mean, how do you even fuck up that badly? Zlatan got sent off and everything. They should have waltzed through that game.
Comedy gold.
Good points, but would it not be tempting to those state GOPers to finally have a reason to prevent Hillary from winning the White House? Some probably would not mind less political ego if it meant that. Thus being the reason why they'd dilute their effectiveness.I doubt it. Jonathan Bernstein has written about this a couple of times.
http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2014-11-12/republicans-arent-rigging-the-electoral-college
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...cans-probably-wont-rig-the-electoral-college/
Two reasons why this is unlikely:
1. Any change like this disempowers the state and the state's politicians while empowering the national party. If Michigan passes this bill it suddenly has the electoral importance of Nebraska. But the people who have to pass this change are the state politicians who will be losing power and influence.
2. The implicit message of a change like this is that, although Republicans control Michigan/Florida/Wisconsin, they are fundamentally blue states that Democrats will continue to win. So to want to pass this bill, you have to believe that you got into office basically on a fluke and don't really represent your state. But you probably don't believe that, because you're a politician. You probably believe that you're the next wave of Republican dominance of these "swing states." In which case, why would you dilute their electoral effectiveness?
Only Chelsea, only Chelsea...
To think they're at the top of the table in England, everyone else should just be embarrassed.
Only Chelsea, only Chelsea...
To think they're at the top of the table in England, everyone else should just be embarrassed.
Do we have a thread following the Israeli elections? Even the wsj has an article in it this morning about how bibi is sinking so Likud must really be up shit's creek.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/20...c-in-likud-ranks-as-opposition-gains-momentumA text message sent to Likud activists, imploring them to get friends and relatives to vote on Tuesday, reads: We are in danger of really losing!
Get used to seeing Hillary Gump references. They're coming.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68qJN9MwDfY
I've heard their internal polls show a wider gap. I hope he loseslooking at polls from the past couple weeks it's looking like Likud's reliably anywhere from tied to 3% behind right now
so I dunno, Bibi might actually finally lose
It was a jokeGod damn, I knew he was crazy, but man, this is really freaking crazy.
Let me suggest a nonpartisan analogy. Let's say that I post on two Internet forums, the second of which includes a section devoted to discussing the first. Let's say that I, as though a child incapable of understanding his emotions, want to communicate to my fellow second-forumgoers that I wish cancer upon one of the folks posting in the first forum (who goes by the moniker "So-and-so"). So, I write a post at the second forum that says: "Dear So-and-so: I wish you would die of cancer." This serves a function (sparking a discussion about the poster or, at the very least, conveying my disgust with his prolixity), even though it isn't communicated to the person on whom I wish cancer. This is like the Senators' open letter if it is not sent to the foreign leaders: it's accessible to them (being open and online), but not directly sent to them. Its purpose is to force a domestic dialogue with (or about) the president, not to open a dialogue with the foreign leaders.
But imagine that I, childlike emotional underdevelopment and all, feel that the message is pointless unless I am certain it is received. So, I send a PM to the person on the first forum on whom I wish cancer: "Dear So-and-so: I wish you would die of cancer." This serves decidedly different functions, including specifically conveying to that poster how I feel about him and opening a direct dialogue between us. This would be like the open letter if it is sent to the foreign leaders: the Senators can be fairly confident of its receipt, and its sending suggests that perhaps the foreign leaders (as opposed to the president) should be involving Congress in negotiations.
This is a really good analogy, actually.
Another example I thought of would be this. Instead of telling a bunch of low-income people with heart disease, cancer, etc, that I wish for them to die of their conditions, I could just very vocally support an outcome of a lawsuit that would result in some of those people dying of cancer, heart disease, etc. I'm not actually telling them directly that I'm okay with them dropping dead, but I am indirectly saying it.
Hmm. I can't see it being a joke exactly, but I could simply call it a misuse of the word "literally". This is a prime example why "literally" should never be used metaphorically.
Ummmmmm ....
Good points, but would it not be tempting to those state GOPers to finally have a reason to prevent Hillary from winning the White House?
good. Bibi is cancerous.looking at polls from the past couple weeks it's looking like Likud's reliably anywhere from tied to 3% behind right now
so I dunno, Bibi might actually finally lose
One IAFF leader said, in reference to Cruzs speech, I had to take a shower after listening to that.
Ummmmmm ....
You know for a lot of people that would have been really difficult an they would have struggled. Cruz is just so robotic, it's kind of amazing. I realize watching that video that he has never actually engaged his audience in any fashion, just recite line, pause for applause, repeat.
Cruz will never be President. Not because of his politics or anything really substantial but because he is the living, breathing form of Droopy.
Every time I see him speak, I can only see Droopy speaking. He looks and sounds like him. And I'm sure that's in everyone's subconscious.
I know it's superficial, but voters are superficial, and I'm so unafraid of this clown becoming President compared to some others.
Cruz will never be President. Not because of his politics or anything really substantial but because he is the living, breathing form of Droopy.
Every time I see him speak, I can only see Droopy speaking. He looks and sounds like him. And I'm sure that's in everyone's subconscious.
I know it's superficial, but voters are superficial, and I'm so unafraid of this clown becoming President compared to some others.
You know for a lot of people that would have been really difficult an they would have struggled. Cruz is just so robotic, it's kind of amazing. I realize watching that video that he has never actually engaged his audience in any fashion, just recite line, pause for applause, repeat.
Yeah, when I think of Droopy, I think more of someone like Joe Lieberman.
Yeah, when I think of Droopy, I think more of someone like Joe Lieberman.
Yeah, when I think of Droopy, I think more of someone like Joe Lieberman.
Shutdowns, Government Defaults, Defunct Grand Bargains, Debt Ceilings, Citizens United, People like Cruz/Rubio getting elected, zero compromise. Now they send that letter to Iran.
What happened to the Republican Party? They werent always like this.
Shutdowns, Government Defaults, Defunct Grand Bargains, Debt Ceilings, Citizens United, People like Cruz/Rubio getting elected, zero compromise. Now they send that letter to Iran.
What happened to the Republican Party? They werent always like this.
They've never been this crazy, unless you wanna dial it back to 1920-something.They've been like this for as long as I can remember, and I just turned 27.
It's complicated, but here goes -Who is poised to replace Bibi and are they really much different than him?
They've been like this for as long as I can remember, and I just turned 27.
It's complicated, but here goes -
The biggest party in the next election will most likely be the Zionist Union, they are for the most part the old labor party, and are center left - they support two state solution and generally promote a more progressive domestic agenda.
This party was formed when Labor joined (for no fucking good reason by the way) with Tzipi Livni and part of the deal was that if they form a government, the head of labor, Isaac Herzog and Tzipi Livni will do a 2 year rotation each as prime minister.
Isaac Herzog is just a terrible politician, like, his positions on the issues are okayish, I guess, you can't really expect too much from anyone who has any chance to win an election in Israel, but he's so bad at politics, and he's campaigning make me long for John Kerry.
Tzipi Livni is an awful spineless opportunist, but her opportunism put her on the right side of history, at least for now.
With all that being said, I'm really struggling to see how they'll be able to build a sustainable center-left coalition, you can see scenarios where it's mathematically possible, but it will require a whole lot of parties who pull in very different directions, most likely will exclude the real left wing of Israeli politics and might have to form a PM rotation with another party.
And even if they manage to do that it's hard to see how such coalition survives for too long, and it is very unlikely it will be able to do anything too meaningful in regards of the big structural problems Israel is facing.
Sadly, I think the two most likely scenarios are a center right Likud led coalition with Bibi as a PM, or a big unity coalition between the Likud and the Zionist Union (and a few more parties) which I think is going to be even worse for Israel long term.
Herzog is, she weaseled her way into a rotation agreement when she joined forces with labor, though polls showing she and that rotation agreement is actually hurting the zionist union in the poll.Ah, yes.
Livni was who I had in mind but I could not remember her name. She seems like the country's best shot even if she is, as you said, a shell. Has to be better than Bibi and I was hoping she'd be next.
Bad, worse, even worse, respectively.Seems like there's no good outcome with Bibi always finding a way to stay in power. smdh Israel.
It will be interesting to see what the future of Israel will look like 10, 15, 20+ years from now.