ItWasMeantToBe19
Banned
Going to 100% clean energy would probably destroy Russia and Saudi Arabia as nations which could beneficial in foreign policy, but that connection isn't really ever made in Hillary's "clean energy superpower!" thing.
What does "clean energy superpower" even mean?
... A clean energy future is one where all of our energy comes from solar, wind, nuclear, and geothermal... Where does the superpower stuff come from? Are we heavily influencing other nations with this clean energy? Are we... exporting somehow?
That catchphrase from Hillary doesn't make much sense to me.
1000 years of Aguayo for you DM friend.
Just voted in Nevada
+1 Crooked Hillary and Weed
Him over Jameis? If you say so
What does "clean energy superpower" even mean?
... A clean energy future is one where all of our energy comes from solar, wind, nuclear, and geothermal... Where does the superpower stuff come from? Are we heavily influencing other nations with this clean energy? Are we... exporting somehow?
That catchphrase from Hillary doesn't make much sense to me.
The perfect candidate?
Republicans describe Kander as nearly the perfect Democratic candidate in a conservative state, one whose Army background and straight-talking style make him nearly invulnerable to the kind of pointed attacks theyve deployed against Senate candidates elsewhere.
But even given that, they argue that Blunts unforced errors and once-lackadaisical approach have made the race much closer than it should be. Thats been frustrating, they say, especially in a year when the party already had to defend seven states President Obama won twice.
If he had run half, or even one-third, the campaign Rob Portman did in the off year, he probably wouldnt have been here, said one senior Senate Republican strategist. (Ohio Sen. Portman is believed to be running the years best Senate campaign.)
The few publicly available polls show Blunt with a tiny lead, but officials in both parties say the race is effectively a dead heat two weeks before Election Day. And neither side says they are confident they know how it will turn out.
This race will be decided by a few thousand votes, said Scott Rupp, a former Republican state senator in Missouri. Its going to be tight.
The GOPs biggest concern about Blunt, however, has been his struggle to beat back the charge that hes done more to help himself and his family than the average voter.
Blunt, a former majority whip in the House who won election into the Senate in 2010, is a political institution in the state. He first won statewide office as Missouris secretary of State in 1984, and one of his sons, Matt Blunt, was elected governor of Missouri in 2004.
But his long tenure in office has been a liability especially given the fact that Blunts wife and three children are all lobbyists.
And Blunt exacerbated the problem when he named his son Andy, a registered lobbyist in Missouri, his campaign manager.
The decision gave Kander the license to say, as he often does, that a lobbyist is literally running the senators campaign and infuriated Republicans in Washington.
It is one of the more confounding decisions of this campaign, said the senior Republican strategist, who requested anonymity to talk candidly. It is an example of a level of hubris that cannot be denied.
Blunt further compounded the problem in January, when he defended his familys chosen profession in an interview to a St. Louis radio station.
I dont even understand why that would be a question, he said. Everybodys family does something,
That quote has subsequently appeared in Kanders ads.
So, what are the chances that, during Hillary's victory speech on election night, she just outright bursts out "Donald, you're fired!" followed by thunderous applause and raucous cheers? Considering all the crap that Trump spewed her way, would this really be considered bad form?
Path Trump is targeting it looks like:
Hold NC + AZ + GA + UT
Flip FL + OH + IA + NV + NH
Win ME-2
That's 270 exactly. Improbable, but looks like the path he's chosen.
On election night? Yeah, I think that's bad form. Need to be humble about it.
More like impossible. Man I would hate to be working on his campaign. Probably drink myself to death.
Remember what Michelle Obama said!!So, what are the chances that, during Hillary's victory speech on election night, she just outright bursts out "Donald, you're fired!" followed by thunderous applause and raucous cheers? Considering all the crap that Trump spewed her way, would this really be considered bad form?
Path Trump is targeting it looks like:
Hold NC + AZ + GA + UT
Flip FL + OH + IA + NV + NH
Win ME-2
That's 270 exactly. Improbable, but looks like the path he's chosen.
Biden is coming here on Friday for a rally with Kander. It's pretty exciting.Kander is amazing. He's gotta win this.
So, what are the chances that, during Hillary's victory speech on election night, she just outright bursts out "Donald, you're fired!" followed by thunderous applause and raucous cheers? Considering all the crap that Trump spewed her way, would this really be considered bad form?
So, what are the chances that, during Hillary's victory speech on election night, she just outright bursts out "Donald, you're fired!" followed by thunderous applause and raucous cheers? Considering all the crap that Trump spewed her way, would this really be considered bad form?
So, what are the chances that, during Hillary's victory speech on election night, she just outright bursts out "Donald, you're fired!" followed by thunderous applause and raucous cheers? Considering all the crap that Trump spewed her way, would this really be considered bad form?
A couple polls showing a race closer doesn't indicate tightening.
I mean, it might indicate tightening. It could also be what we'd expect if the race isn't tightening, too.
Once again, if a race is say Hillary +8, that does not mean a good poll should always show Hillary +8. If it did, something would be wrong with the polls.
Ken bone is very concernedEven Pokemon-Go-to-the-polls Hillary isn't that lame. I think. I hope.
Also no one cares about Wikileaks now. Obamacare problems suck but they're real and it is what it is. Some of you don't seem to ask yourselves whose votes these things would suddenly change.
I kind of am
Today has seen a real bucket of cold water dumped over my optimism. "Tightening" polls, Trump's promise to dump a ton of money on last minute attack ads, and the promise of GOP super-obstruction and a parade of congressional hearings even if we win has me feeling pretty glum.
So
Trump is doing a fundraising thing where if you donate $69 dollars (nice) you get your name engraved on a plaque that is going to be put up in Trump Tower. Only 2000 spots are left, though.
Like.
1) Why?
and also
2) This feels slightly not FEC approved to me?
So, what are the chances that, during Hillary's victory speech on election night, she just outright bursts out "Donald, you're fired!" followed by thunderous applause and raucous cheers? Considering all the crap that Trump spewed her way, would this really be considered bad form?
Those are from their 50-state poll dump and aren't that greatSurveyMonkey 10/23:
GA
Trump 47
Clinton 44
FL
Clinton 47
Trump 44
IA
Trump 44
Clinton 40
#Texas GE:
Trump 45% (+7)
Clinton 38%
Johnson 7%
Crosswind/American-Statesman
Texas Pulse poll 10/22-24
Mark Murray hinting that the new NBC/WSJ polls show Clinton still in double digits.
I have a question thats concerning though. Why is there a discrepancy between a double digit national lead vs closer than expected battleground polling (OH, IA, NC, FL mostly)? I remember the opposite case being true in 2012. Obama was down consistently in national polling but had healthy margins in OH and elsewhere.
In perhaps the most surprising result, Trump had a larger lead with Texas women than with Texas men. Trump led 43 percent to 39 percent with men, and 46 percent to 38 percent with women.
Mark Murray hinting that the new NBC/WSJ polls show Clinton still in double digits.
I have a question thats concerning though. Why is there a discrepancy between a double digit national lead vs closer than expected battleground polling (OH, IA, NC, FL mostly)? I remember the opposite case being true in 2012. Obama was down consistently in national polling but had healthy margins in OH and elsewhere.
I took a Masters level course on integrating Canada and the US or a North American Union........it would not go well for Canada so no thanks, we'll keep Trudeau for ourselves
omg
Mark Murray hinting that the new NBC/WSJ polls show Clinton still in double digits.
I have a question thats concerning though. Why is there a discrepancy between a double digit national lead vs closer than expected battleground polling (OH, IA, NC, FL mostly)? I remember the opposite case being true in 2012. Obama was down consistently in national polling but had healthy margins in OH and elsewhere.
On election night? Yeah, I think that's bad form. Need to be humble about it.
Remember what Michelle Obama said!!
She should just not mention Trump at all. Don't congratulate him on a good race or anything like that because that would be a straight up lie. I don't see Trump calling Hillary to concede anyway.
Even Pokemon-Go-to-the-polls Hillary isn't that lame. I think. I hope.
PoliGAF, you are gentlemen/gentlewomen and scholars all.She's the President-elect. WTF would she do this and make her life more difficult?
I wish all political ads could focus on positivity like this. The world would be just a little bit better.Whoa, this new ad by Maggie Hassan - I didn't realize she had a disabled son.
https://twitter.com/dscc/status/791372586588315648
But what does this tell us? In future do Democrats have to poll as well as Hillary nationally in order to have a slight advantage in FL/NC/OH? Because Hillary's national lead will not happen every 4 years.NC is a Republican leaning state, the leads Clinton is polling with there reflect her national margin. She's polling better in Florida than Obama did. Ohio and Iowa are places where Trump is overperforming thanks to his strengths with whites without a college education. Look at Hillary's gaudy leads in Virginia, PA. NH, and Colorado. I don't see a discrepancy that isn't explained by looking at the specifics of the state in question.