Ahh alright, my news updates were delayed so I thought it was something bigger.An officer was shot. Minor injuries. Suspect in custody. Not much of a story there.
Ahh alright, my news updates were delayed so I thought it was something bigger.An officer was shot. Minor injuries. Suspect in custody. Not much of a story there.
Martin O'Malley was to the right of Hillary and there was just no appetite for him. That said, he performed about as well in 2016 as Biden did in 2008.
There was some appetite for him in some Florida panhandle counties.Martin O'Malley was to the right of Hillary and there was just no appetite for him. That said, he performed about as well in 2016 as Biden did in 2008.
@JesseLehrich
.@HillaryClinton has won 17 of 21 states where over 7% of eligible voters have turned out.
👀
👀
Kasie Hunt ‏@kasie 3m3 minutes ago
Sanders will campaign like a Brookynite in NY while Clinton will campaign like a senator, senior Clinton strategist tells reporters
Gabriel Debenedetti ‏@gdebenedetti 2m2 minutes ago
"We do not envision a scenario where in New York he can dent our delegate lead significantly," says Benenson of Sanders.
Gabriel Debenedetti ‏@gdebenedetti 7m7 minutes ago
This is significant: Sanders aides have said they plan to take over 6/7, Team Clinton now saying the math is impossible for him after 4/26
Gabriel Debenedetti ‏@gdebenedetti 9m9 minutes ago
"After April 26 there simply is not enough real estate left for Senator Sanders" says Benenson. That's PA, MD, CT, RI, DE
Gabriel Debenedetti ‏@gdebenedetti 10m10 minutes ago
Sanders needs to win 57% of remaining delegates, says Clinton's Benenson, adding he's only reached that in 2 primaries: VT and NH.
Gabriel Debenedetti ‏@gdebenedetti 16m16 minutes ago
"She has won in 17 of the 21 states where more than 7% of eligible voters turn out" - chief Clinton strategist @benensonj
You can't pretend that a section of Bernie's support isnt just Not Clinton. In a competitive three person race, Bernie is a distant third....especially when the other candidate is to the Right of Hillary.
They feel a bit confident after their caucus wins and it's making them look silly.What is with the Bernie campaign today?
Well, not really news. Bernie says he'll win in California, because he has to say that. Hillary says he won't be able to by then, because she has to say that.
edit: Worth noting that "We don't see a situation where Bernie gains a lot of delegates in NY" is pretty meek compared to the last poll showing Clinton +48 with 6% undecided. Not sure I like that tentativeness.
Gotta make sure people turn out. If everyone assumes he'll get killed people may not show up and that's no good.
Worst damage control ever. They're pretty awful.Jesus, I can respect Bernie, but fuck Devine and Weaver. They are the Mark Penn of this cycle.
Well, not really news. Bernie says he'll win in California, because he has to say that. Hillary says he won't be able to by then, because she has to say that.
edit: Worth noting that "We don't see a situation where Bernie gains a lot of delegates in NY" is pretty meek compared to the last poll showing Clinton +48 with 6% undecided. Not sure I like that tentativeness.
I can see it being true though to what Beneson said. There's around 600 delegates in the 19th and 26th most are in states that are favorably to her if she gets around 400 delegates most of which are from the 3 biggest states she would come out with around a 600 delegate lead and that also means she has enough total delegates to win the primary.
This response: "bernie fans think black people only get 3/5ths of a vote"
It's playing expectations. Being cocky about a specific race won't benefit her in any way. Make sure supporters aren't complacent and come out to vote, and don't enable a media narrative where potentially falling short of lofty stated goals somehow gives Bernie 'momentum'.Well, not really news. Bernie says he'll win in California, because he has to say that. Hillary says he won't be able to by then, because she has to say that.
edit: Worth noting that "We don't see a situation where Bernie gains a lot of delegates in NY" is pretty meek compared to the last poll showing Clinton +48 with 6% undecided. Not sure I like that tentativeness.
Hey, don't bad mouth Gov Sexpants. I had a massive....appetite for him.
There was some appetite for him in some Florida panhandle counties.
Don't know the original source. Found it on SA.What's this from?
she's not winning any of them with 66-70% of the vote to make her delegate lead greater than 500
That cabinet list reads like a fake Smash Bros roster you'd find on gamefaqs
I look forward to one running! Assuming they drop all the dumb anti-trade stuff.
Higher turnout favors Hillary confirmed.
Also what does "campaign like a Brooklynite" mean? I'm not familiar with NYC. Will he constantly remind people he was born there 75 years ago?
And the "we should label GMOs" stance. I mean c'mon Bernie what the hell
Somebody posted a poll earlier with Clinton with a ten point lead in the Bay Area.
I'm not sure what area is going to be friendlier to Sanders than that! Like, where do you think he does better?
So... sanders 10x more likely to beat Trump?
http://m.dailykos.com/story/2016/3/...ll-Sanders-10-times-more-likely-to-beat-Trump
You can tell by reddit and in this forum that Bernie Supporters aren't yet warmed up to the idea of flipping to Hillary.
So... sanders 10x more likely to beat Trump?
http://m.dailykos.com/story/2016/3/...ll-Sanders-10-times-more-likely-to-beat-Trump
Here are the new Quinnipiac poll findings and how I interpret them:
CLINTON 46, TRUMP 40 in a November matchup, according to Quinnipaic.
But there's a plus-or-minus 2.6 percent margin of error. So the result could be...
CLINTON 43.4, TRUMP 42.6 — Clinton's low end against Trump's high end, within the poll’s margin of error.
Notice, it leaves just 0.8 percent between Clinton and Trump — such a slim lead, it’s all but meaningless this early in the general-election season.
The implication: Clinton and Trump are a virtual tossup. Flip a coin and we could be watching The Drumpf take office.
I am ignorant about GMOs.
I thought they were "bad" because they were so much more effective (and identical, cloned, no variation), that farmer that refused to use GMOs would be put out of business because they couldn't compete.
Also didn't the GMO seed owners sue everyone that had crops that were from GMO seeds but not purchased directly?
(Please let me know if I am totally off base here.)