Representatives for the group, called the Committee for American Sovereignty, say they expect to raise $20 million between now and the GOP convention in July and upwards of $100 million throughout the course of the campaign.
Doug Watts, national executive director and spokesman for the group, who also served as a former adviser to Ben Carson, told ABC News that the group's mission is to combat the "Clinton machine."
With the recent announcement that a pro-Hillary Clinton super PAC has already booked over $90 million in ad time in just seven states in June, it is clear we need to ramp up major donor fundraising efforts, unify Republicans, and take on the Clinton machine. We have already begun to raise significant funds in California and from supporters across the country," Watts said.
The advisory committee to the Committee for American Sovereignty includes military leaders, the former chairman of Trump Resorts International and political activists from across the country.
For the lazy:
https://oig.state.gov/system/files/statement_of_the_icig_and_oig_regarding_review_of_clintons_emails_july_24_2015.pdf
Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG):
Doesn't matter. Violates the law. Can't house this stuff on a private server. She signed off on the SF-312 which lays this out specifically.
Why did the server exist in the first place?
Were those emails received or sent?
Here is my early recommendation for the next OT title:
PoliGAF 2015 |OT6| The Shills Have Eyes
Doesn't matter, shouldn't have been on that server period.
If the problem was that Hillary was not allowed to have a private server to begin with, then wouldn't this have been an open and shut case since last March? Why would the FBI needed to investigate for 14 months on whether or not a private server was legal to have?
so if someone sends you drugs, and they're sitting in your mailbox, the cops can come up to you and arrest you, because "they shouldn't have been in that mailbox period"?Doesn't matter, shouldn't have been on that server period.
I promise I will not.If Aaron diablos..
That is a really bad sign.
Actually thats pretty much how that worksso if someone sends you drugs, and they're sitting in your mailbox, the cops can come up to you and arrest you, because "they shouldn't have been in that mailbox period"?
What's misleading Y2Kev?
I'm posting PDFs from state officials and documents that Hillary signed. Hosted on government links. I think that's valid evidence.
Nobody has provided much besides the following:
50/50 comments, LOL and shitty JPGS.
You want to ban me over that? Is that how it works here?
Doesn't matter, shouldn't have been on that server period.
What's misleading Y2Kev?
I'm posting PDFs from state officials and documents that Hillary signed. Hosted on government links. I think that's valid evidence.
Nobody has provided much besides the following:
50/50 comments, LOL and shitty JPGS.
You want to ban me over that? Is that how it works here?
well I stand corrected then. also it sounds like a difficult thing to prove.Actually thats pretty much how that works
You have to prove in the courts that you weren't expecting them
PoliGAF 2015 |OT6| The Hillz Have Lies
Uh, yeah it matters.
SHould I be responsible for what people send me?
Shouldn't have been stored on there. Outside of an authorized server.
Why where classified emails being sent to an unauthorized location? Why circumvent the existing secured infrastructure?
feel like this is still importantIf the problem was that Hillary was not allowed to have a private server to begin with, then wouldn't this have been an open and shut case since last March? Why would the FBI needed to investigate for 14 months on whether or not a private server was legal to have?
Why where classified emails being sent to an unauthorized location? Why circumvent the existing secured infrastructure?
From that:
So even if you want to go down that road, it's still no wrongdoing on her part.The four emails, which have not been released through the State FOIA process, did not contain classification markings and/or dissemination controls.
For the lazy:
https://oig.state.gov/system/files/statement_of_the_icig_and_oig_regarding_review_of_clintons_emails_july_24_2015.pdf
Inspector General of the Intelligence Community (IC IG):
The four emails, which have not been released through the State FOIA process, did not contain classification markings and/or dissemination controls.
From that:
So even if you want to go down that road, it's still no wrongdoing on her part.
When Y2Kev and shinra-bansho posts it really feels like good cop bad cop.
The Shills Have Lies
I think you mean best cop best cop.When Y2Kev and shinra-bansho post subsequent posts it really feels like good cop bad cop.
Sshhhhhh.for a long time I thot bansho was kev's alt account because of the tag
for a long time I thot bansho was kev's alt account because of the tag
When Y2Kev and shinra-bansho post subsequent posts it really feels like good cop bad cop.
Colin Powell is not running against sanders so no one cares if he did anything with his emails or if he goes to jail or not.Previous Secretaries of State (Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice included) did this too
Not emails classified at the time of sending, but same situation as Hillary
I'm so glad I wasn't alone in this thought.Same!
Shouldn't have been stored on there. Outside of an authorized server.
Why where classified emails being sent to an unauthorized location? Why circumvent the existing secured infrastructure?
First off, I'm offended that after I spent all that time last night responding to you, the best you come up with is that I gave you a lol or a shitty jpeg.
Once again, the very document you posted indicates clearly that the information transmitted through the server did not contain -- again, did not contain -- classidication markings. This is frankly different than information subsequently marked classified, but it was not marked as such during the initial transfer. The agency alleges it should have been marked at the time it was generated. But it wasn't. Is this not meaningful to you?
SF-312, which you can read in its entirety on Wikipedia, relates entirely to the sharing of classified information to unauthorized individuals. Regardless of how you frame this, the information you linked again states very clearly that it was not marked classified!
Now I have noticed you keep saying "doesn't matter" or "no difference" (except that there is a difference) but I'm finding it frustrating that when I actually used the language of the law-- KNOWINGLY transmitting of classified information-- you ignored it. Oh and then you compared it to petraeus and said what Hillary did was worse.
So if you don't understand now why I think what you are doing is disingenuous then I think we have a real issue.
Furthermore, why is the SoS doing official government business on an unauthorized server? When there is a perfectly capable existing government backed system in place for this? Does this sound normal to you? And please don't say Powell or Rice, because it's not comparable in the least. It's not normal to be frank.
If the problem was that Hillary was not allowed to have a private server to begin with, then wouldn't this have been an open and shut case since last March? Why would the FBI needed to investigate for 14 months on whether or not a private server was legal to have?
So answer my question please:
Oh my god. You literally have no idea what the heck you are talking about.
Information can be 'born' classified? That's not how it works at *all*. Have you any actual experience with government security systems and protocols or classified or secret information?
Admittedly I'm in the UK, but unless the law is wildly different what you gave posted is simply untrue and also really clueless. Given the UK has the Official Secrets Act and tends to be far stricter than other western nations about these things I really doubt it's different.
"It's born classified," said J. William Leonard, a former director of the U.S. government's Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO). Leonard was director of ISOO, part of the National Archives and Records Administration, from 2002 until 2008, and worked for both the Bill Clinton and George W. Bush administrations.
As Dan Senor pointed out on WADR today, McCain was leading Obama by 10% at this point in 2008 while Obama was still in the primary. If Trump is in a statistical tie at this point, it doesn't bode well for him long term.
I'm catching the flu or something.
I'm dying internally here at work... more than usual anyway.
send help
I was going to ask that. Ivyyyyyyyy
STELLA???
STELLLLLLLLLLLLAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!