Trump-Gingrich? Eww
These fuckers might win. Hillary pls get your favorables up.
Also Biden should have run. If nothing else he would have nullified Berniementum.
Are you cray cray? Gringrich has had high unfavorables since the late 90s!
Trump-Gingrich? Eww
These fuckers might win. Hillary pls get your favorables up.
Also Biden should have run. If nothing else he would have nullified Berniementum.
Are you cray cray? Gringrich has had high unfavorables since the late 90s!
Gonna be a lot of disappointed folks when the FBI wags their finger at her security, but no wrong doing was found and no charges will be filed.
I'm not really sure why, but a lot of (crazy) people seem to believe something is going down next week,
Picking Gingrich would be another one of those amazing moments where folks pause and ask themselves, "is he intentionally trying to lose this thing?"
Jesus you guys are really invested in one single vote.
It's not like that stupid ass Asimov story where future Nate Silver got so good that elections are determined by one person voting.
It's one vote.
Edit: yeah, googled it and it's about the future election of 2008.
Thanks Obama.
Trump-Gingrich? Eww
These fuckers might win. Hillary pls get your favorables up.
Also Biden should have run. If nothing else he would have nullified Berniementum.
Ron Paul
Ben Carson
Donald Trump
Bernie Sanders
What do they have in common?!? A crazy person wants to vote for all of them.
Trump-Gingrich? Eww
These fuckers might win. Hillary pls get your favorables up.
Also Biden should have run. If nothing else he would have nullified Berniementum.
I'm looking at the 2012 results @ http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/ and I don't think any state is likely to flip outside of North Carolina. Not saying this election will be boring, far from it, but the actual results might be.
They need to hold on to that statistical dead heat narrative as long as they can and I don't see it sticking much longer.It's sort of annoying that the freshest national polls are DEAD HEATS from the four shittiest pollsters this cycle and one tracking poll.
Like if it's this close now that's still not a huge concern but I'd like to have some idea whether it's actually the case.
They need to hold on to that statistical dead heat narrative as long as they can and I don't see it sticking much longer.
Why is Donald Trump so weird?
Using a fake spokesperson to call in an tell anecdotes about your life? Why not... just do it yourself?
How did this go on for 30 years lol
The more I read about him, the more he really seems like a bizarre little man who lives a strange life and has strange quirks.
NY Times July 13 said:Using the Name John Baron
Asked whether he knew about undocumented workers, Mr. Trump said, ''I really still don't know that there were illegal aliens.''
In earlier testimony to show the Trump organization knew about the undocumented workers, John Szabo, an immigration lawyer who represented them, said someone who said his name was Mr. Baron telephoned on behalf of the Trump organization in 1980 and threatened to sue him if he did not drop the workers' claims of back payments.
Mr. Trump acknowledged yesterday that he and one of his executives have used the name John Baron in some of their business dealings. He did not explain. And he was not asked about Mr. Szabo's allegation.
It's kind of sad that the media has played such a role in promoting Trump's cause and that was before they even got to the "we want elections results to be as close as possible so we get more eyeballs" part of the election.
He admitted he used the name "John Barron" under oath in 1990 during a trial.
http://www.nytimes.com/1990/07/13/nyregion/trump-says-he-didn-t-know-he-employed-illegal-aliens.html
Discrediting the pollsters for that sweet dead heatGoing to fun to watch Hillary's presumed candidate bump, where it'll show her +15 or something ridiculous, and see how the media handles it.
Going to fun to watch Hillary's presumed candidate bump, where it'll show her +15 or something ridiculous, and see how the media handles it.
Once the presumed separation in polling numbers takes off I think they'll have to think about it really hard.Also any news on SupCourt nominee stuff, or are they going to play this out till the very last moment before Clinton gets to do what she wants and accept Garland
Traditionally, the color for the left-leaning party is red and the color for the right-leaning party is blue. America just likes the be contrarian.This is pretty cool. But, why are the colors backwards? My brain can't cope.
Discrediting the pollsters for that sweet dead heat
well, a Trump dumpster fire campaign implosion could serve as an even better story than your usual boring "dead heat" narrative
Traditionally, the color for the left-leaning party is red and the color for the right-leaning party is blue. America just likes the be contrarian.It's the media's fault.
And the universal red/blue only became the standard in 2000. Before that, each network would decide what they wanted to do.
How in the blue hell are Republicans so fucking bad at Opposition Research? Like, how in the hell do you miss this? Why are you wasting time talking about fucking Trump steaks guys!?
How in the blue hell are Republicans so fucking bad at Opposition Research? Like, how in the hell do you miss this? Why are you wasting time talking about fucking Trump steaks guys!?
Mainly that he has no idealogical principles when it comes to policy and is just interested in do-nothing politics that center on being anti establishment.This... explains so much.
How in the blue hell are Republicans so fucking bad at Opposition Research? Like, how in the hell do you miss this? Why are you wasting time talking about fucking Trump steaks guys!?
Dave is stubborn and sticks to how it was in the 1980's on NBC.This is pretty cool. But, why are the colors backwards? My brain can't cope.
Same in Canada. The most left-leaning party there is actually orange. Honestly I don't care either way which color they choose for Democrats, I like them both. Maybe purple should be an option.That's hilarious coming from someone who grew up in the UK where the colours were always established in my lifetime.
At noon eastern, we will find out if Chris Christie is named as a co-conspirator in Bridgegate.
Breaking Politics @breakingpol
Judge delays release of NJ 'bridgegate' co-conspirators list until Tuesday after 'John Doe' seeks stay - WNYC
NEVER MIND I GUESS NOT
Mainly that he has no idealogical principles when it comes to policy and is just interested in do-nothing politics that center on being anti establishment.
There's really no logical explanation for supporting a libertarian for president and then a socialist for president. One less poster to pay attention to.
A judge has delayed the release of the Bridgegate unindicted co-conspirators list until Tuesday. Her order came as the clock ticked down to the noon hour, when prosecutors were supposed to release the names of public employees and officials who abetted the plot to shut down lanes of the George Washington Bridge.
An unknown individual, filing as "John Doe," intervened at the eleventh hour. Saying the release of the man's name "brands him as a criminal without due process of law," his lawyer, Jenny Kramer, of the prominent Manhattan law firm Chadbourne & Parke, is asking a federal judge to stay the release of the names until she can argue her case.
NEVER MIND I GUESS NOT