thekad said:
Have you cited any evidence to prove otherwise?
Do you honestly believe Obama's favorability numbers, and his standings amongst white voters, independants, and conservatives didn't take a hit?
If you don't, then stop arguing it. If you genuinely do, then I'll be happy to get a few polls for you.
But I'm not going to dig up shit for what should be totally obvious and considering these numbers were already given and this was all relentlessly discussed back when this was the main story.
You may not appreciate me being unwilling to cite all my arguments, but when I do, they go largely ignored or they're totally spun away as if they were nothing. And posters have admitted they don't believe what they're saying, they just want to make me go search for evidence.
Nope, sorry. I'm not doing that. It's exactly what I'm talking about: Arguing for the sake of it. Whether or not I cite my arguments doesn't change the fact that Obama's standings amongst the groups I talked about actually did take a hit and will almost certainly be reflected in some shape or form in the upcoming contests. If you genuinely don't see it, that's fine, then we can bring in other stuff, but stop arguing for the sake of it if you don't believe it yourself. There's no point.