User 10639
Member
fix'dStoOgE said:"And Im going to go to the bar and get a drink... and then I'm gonna get hammered... then I'm gonna go all the way to the bathroom.. PYAAAA"
fix'dStoOgE said:"And Im going to go to the bar and get a drink... and then I'm gonna get hammered... then I'm gonna go all the way to the bathroom.. PYAAAA"
ConfusingJazz said:Have any questions for Howard Dean?
Let me know, I am attending a meeting with him involved, and I am trying to think of good questions to ask the leader of the DNC. If you want anything asked, let me know!
icarus-daedelus said:Why is Nancy Pelosi ruining the catering at the convention? Hell, why is she running it in the first place?
nicesoul creator said:must not be much food there, since everything will be off the table
hiyooo
FitzOfRage said:I'm glad Chuck Todd tried to put it in perspective though by noting that even with a massive electoral college you would likely only get a popular vote margin in the high single digits.
I saw that. I thought you were doing pretty good on your own. (I know nothing of the subject myself.)StoOgE said:Guys, I need help in the Freddie Mac thread.. Im arguing with a bunch of libertarians (anarchists?) who are saying the government should let Fannie May and Freddie Mac go bellie up, consequences be damned.
StoOgE said:Guys, I need help in the Freddie Mac thread.. Im arguing with a bunch of libertarians (anarchists?) who are saying the government should let Fannie May and Freddie Mac go bellie up, consequences be damned.
StoOgE said:Guys, I need help in the Freddie Mac thread.. Im arguing with a bunch of libertarians (anarchists?) who are saying the government should let Fannie May and Freddie Mac go bellie up, consequences be damned.
StoOgE said:Guys, I need help in the Freddie Mac thread.. Im arguing with a bunch of libertarians (anarchists?) who are saying the government should let Fannie May and Freddie Mac go bellie up, consequences be damned.
i have no idea what you're talking about here, but godspeed Macam, godspeed to you.Macam said:Well, there's the problem: don't argue with libertarians. It's the equivalent of arguing about the plausibility of the hyperspace technology of the Enterprise with Star Trek nerds. In other words, sheer fantasy.
Tamanon said:BTW, for those who were really worried about Obama's fundraising....he raisesd 52 million dollars in June, not 30 million as the WSJ said.![]()
RNC has been spanking the DNC, but in June DNC almost matched RNC. Should do even better in July thanks to those $28500 a head fundraisers.maximum360 said:Good news. I hope he can sustain those numbers through November. With the RNC, other groups affiliated with the GOP, and the McCain camp working the loopholes, Obama has his work cut out for him. The RNC is absolutely spanking the DNC when it comes to fundraising as well.
Shortly after sending out that mass email,* however, Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton emailed reporters to note an error: "The Obama campaign has $72 milllion cash on hand on its own, not combined. The DNC totals will be out shortly. "
Per ABC News' Political Director David Chalian, the DNC raised $22,481,194 in June and has $20,306,056 cash on hand. Meaning the Obama campaign and DNC have a combined total of nearly $92 million in the bank, not $72 million as previously claimed.
scorcho said:of all the headlines Drudge could focus on he chooses the Michelle Obama blurb? it's not exactly shocking or vital to know that she is staying home for her husband's first trip to the ME.
how is that even a story?? fuck, who thought she would go to the middle east...and who gives a shit?syllogism said:I'm pretty sure he is focusing on it because he got the story early
The Lamonster said:how is that even a story?? fuck, who thought she would go to the middle east...and who gives a shit?
man even drudge horribly fails sometimes
same thing it tells me when Obama only visits IL when he's offmckmas8808 said:Obama is opening 20 offices in Virginia in July. McCain will open his 5th by the endof the month.
So what does this tell you GAF?
mckmas8808 said:Brian Williams(NBC) Katie Couric (CBS) and Charles Gibson (ABC) are all joining Obama on his overseas trip around the world.
They will be giving interviews with him on back to back days. Talk about media coverage! This trip could be huge!
mckmas8808 said:Brian Williams(NBC) Katie Couric (CBS) and Charles Gibson (ABC) are all joining Obama on his overseas trip around the world.
They will be giving interviews with him on back to back days. Talk about media coverage! This trip could be huge!
From Chuck Todd, Mark Murray, and Domenico Montanaro
*** The double-edged sword: With the news that the network anchors, including NBCs Brian Williams, are planning to catch up with Obama on his overseas trip -- when they didnt do the same for McCain when he traveled abroad -- the New York Times today raises this conversation starter: that the news media are imbalanced in their coverage of the candidates. There is no doubt that Obama, because of his historical candidacy as well as being the new candidate, is receiving more attention. But that presents both rewards and risks. Consider: Just how big of a gaffe would have McCains Sunni-Shiite mistake been had the network anchors all been there to cover it? The extra attention Obama receives also brings more scrutiny. And that's why his trip overseas presents both rewards and risks. And this is the lemons-vs.-lemonade debate the McCain campaign must be having. First, they need to figure out how to bracket this trip and keep pressure on Obama and the reporters covering him there. The time difference will present a challenge, as most of the news Obama makes will be during our broadcasts downtimes. Second, they may need to rethink how they are presenting McCain and the opportunities they are offering the media to cover him in unique and different settings. The irony to the extra coverage this trip is getting for Obama is that the RNC themselves helped hype this trip with their countdown clock on the number of days it's been since Obama last went to Iraq.
It's called Warp Drive, not hyperspace.Macam said:Well, there's the problem: don't argue with libertarians. It's the equivalent of arguing about the plausibility of the hyperspace technology of the Enterprise with Star Trek nerds. In other words, sheer fantasy.
PhoenixDark said:First Read says Obama raised $52 million in June, compared to McCain's $22 (which was his best month). If things continue like this Obama will reach the $250 million max, while McCain will have a total of $140 million (when you count the $84 million he'll get from public financing)
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/07/17/1203669.aspx
Frank the Great said:Does this mean the RNC is funneling less money towards Senate and Congressional races?
You'd think they realize the presidency was a lost cause and at least try to protect some important seats.
scorcho said:PD: the fundraising difference between McCain and Obama is offset by the amount the parties took in.
.
Incognito said:RNC is going to have make a choice: mitigate any huge losses in the House and Senate by throwing $$$ into contests or doubling down on the presidency. For Republicans, their money machine this year is really only the RNC since both the RSCC and RCCC have been MIA. Not to mention the fact that the RCCC is still trying to sort it self out over having millions of dollars stolen from a former employee.
Incognito said:RNC is going to have make a choice: mitigate any huge losses in the House and Senate by throwing $$$ into contests or doubling down on the presidency. For Republicans, their money machine this year is really only the RNC since both the RSCC and RCCC have been MIA. Not to mention the fact that the RCCC is still trying to sort it self out over having millions of dollars stolen from a former employee.
Incognito said:Per Ambinder, Obama opening up 6 offices in Montana -- Billings, Bozeman, Butte, Great Falls, Helena and Missoula.
scorcho said:yep, the RNC can't do a darn thing with that money for McCain.
the RNC would be stupid to push so much money into House races considering general shift in the electorate this cycle.
Incognito said:Per Ambinder, Obama opening up 6 offices in Montana -- Billings, Bozeman, Butte, Great Falls, Helena and Missoula.
So if they decide to not spend money on the house and senate seats this november they will get crushed. Especially in the more light red and purple states and regions.
Fragamemnon said:Given the ever-increasing power of the presidency, it's almost better to lose some Senate and House seats and make a credible run at the Presidency rather than forego the Presidency and keep the seats for sure. This is especially true if there is no way that the majority party in either chamber will change (and that party will not change this cycle in either chamber).
Tamanon said:http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/17/a...l?_r=2&ref=television&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
GAF should be happy, MSNBC President saying that the time is coming soon for Rachel Maddow to get her own show.