• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF Thread of PRESIDENT OBAMA Checkin' Off His List

Status
Not open for further replies.
PhoenixDark said:
I'd rather have my president come out strong and say that himself, as well as give some idea on the direction he thinks we should head in. Instead of sending Axelrod and Gibbs out for damage control. Instead we've had hours of democrats eating themselves.
SOTU
 

ToxicAdam

Member
If you oppose health care, is it because:

A: It goes to far
B: It doesn't go far enough
C: Not sure


Answer: Well, I am in favor of health care reform and feel that every American should be covered. But, I feel as if the current plan is too costly to acheive this possibility and I fear how it will effect the health care plan I receive now. I feel the best possible answer is a single payer system that will share risk across the entire population, but that's not a possibility right now.


Survey taker: So, you feel as if HCR goes too far and doesn't go far enough?


Answer: Shit, just put me down for C.
 

Pimpwerx

Member
JoeBoy101 said:
And as a quick aside, Brown for VP, Pres, or anything other than Senate in 2012 is an unequivocal bad idea. Let the guy get some experience.
He drives a truck. I'm not sure what other experience he needs to run the country. PEACE.
 
So, I'm probably going to unsubscribe from this thread for a while after today -- I don't need GAF bringing a fresh flow of bile up into my throat every time I click the User CP link, thanks -- but I figure I'll respond once more for the road.

The Chosen One said:
Also, the people here (and elsewhere) squawking about the lack of bi-partisanship from Obama/Dems, this just shows how awful the Dems are at messaging.

It's true, although on top of the Dems being extremely bad at messaging (which they've consistently been for, like, at least 20 years) you also have a media establishment which has actively worked throughout this process to brazenly lie about what's going on. The Democratic leadership bent over backwards over the past year to offer opportunities for bipartisanship, to give moderate Republicans power over their domestic agenda, and to pass legislation that was centrist rather than liberal, but you'd be hard-pressed to find anyone who will agree to that because the media has consistently described it as precisely the opposite of what actually occurred (and, getting back to the bad-messaging thing, Democrats have actively allowed them to get away with it rather than take opportunities to speak clearly and cleanly on matter.)

ToxicAdam said:
You better be focused on jobs, you better campaign hard and you better not get too negative.

I don't understand why we didn't learn these fucking lessons in 200-fucking-4.

devilhawk said:
Edit: Why did many of the Western Massachusetts counties vote Democrat? Obviously Amherst and Springfield are more urban, but what about the most western and northern counties?

Union workers and hippies. There are basically zero people in the Berkshires but they're all going to lean liberal. Once you get past exit 5 on the Pike, though, you're headed into Connectichusetts and the legions of barftastic suburbs whose votes dwarfed what meager offerings Worcester, Boston, and P-town could toss into the breach.

gkrykewy said:
He lost control of the health care issue by deferring too long to committees and congressional leadership.

I'm glad that the armchair quarterback angle on this has deftly switched from "obv. the President needs to let Congress hash out legislation and not just hand them a bill to sign" to "obv. the President needs to just hand Congress a bill to sign and not let them hash out legislation themselves" so quickly. :lol

As much as Obama failed to message effectively on health care, I don't see how it fucking matters. Systemic obstacles have stopped anything from getting passed here and now that they've taken a one-year vacation I see fucking liberals lining up to blame each other and ignore the actual obstacles that got us where we are now, again. For fuck's sake.

Byakuya769 said:
This is a pretty smart guy, btw.

No, it isn't.

JoeBoy101 said:
With the metaphorical gun to my head, if I were Obama, I'd get the congressional leadership together (all of them), and lock them in a room with me for up to a week (have the Secret Service guard the doors) non-stop until a reform bill can be hashed out everyone can agree with.

Pretty much, yep. I'll definitely say straight-up that Obama should be calling Reid and Pelosi both to the mat here and not letting them leave 'til they promise to do their fucking jobs and pass a bill.

Y2Kev said:
Also interesting:

It's official, if anyone's mad, they can blame amir0x.
 

JoeBoy101

Member
charlequin said:
So, I'm probably going to unsubscribe from this thread for a while after today -- I don't need GAF bringing a fresh flow of bile up into my throat every time I click the User CP link, thanks -- but I figure I'll respond once more for the road.

*waves wistfully* Come Back, Shane.
 
Dax01 said:

I can't imagine the WH remaining silent until the SOTU. They have to do something. The best scenario is that they convince the house to pass the senate bill in exchange for immediate reconciliation. The progressives should demand a medicare buy in.
 
SlipperySlope said:
Hey hey hey. Calm down.

How would people term Regan a one-term president with the amount of support he had?

Because the economy kept getting worse. That's why. A look at his polls shows how disastrous his numbers were. If it wasn't for Paul Volcker getting us out of the recession then Reagan would've been done for.
 
PhoenixDark said:
I can't imagine the WH remaining silent until the SOTU. They have to do something. The best scenario is that they convince the house to pass the senate bill in exchange for immediate reconciliation. The progressives should demand a medicare buy in.
And he's not given up. Look, either way, the biggest way he can push for HCR reform is through the SOTU. Until then, let's see what happens.
 

mckmas8808

Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
charlequin said:
Pretty much, yep. I'll definitely say straight-up that Obama should be calling Reid and Pelosi both to the mat here and not letting them leave 'til they promise to do their fucking jobs and pass a bill.
.

THIS!


PhoenixDark said:
I can't imagine the WH remaining silent until the SOTU. They have to do something. The best scenario is that they convince the house to pass the senate bill in exchange for immediate reconciliation. The progressives should demand a medicare buy in.


THIS too! Damn PoliGaf is coming up with some great ideas.
 

JoeBoy101

Member
Jason's Ultimatum said:
WOW if true, but moveon.org?

That's the poll Puffington Host is talking about. Move On might have commissioned it, but Research 2000 did the poll. I'm telling you the crosstabs show a very liberal constituency that feels that Obama has not done enough and that the focus should be on the Economy and Jobs. But at the same time, is very much for democrats.

Not to rub salt on the wound, but Coakley should have won this election. Based on this poll, it should have been a cakewalk. For example:

Generally speaking, do you think Democrats in Washington, DC are fighting hard enough to challenge the Republican policies of the Bush years, aren’t fighting hard enough to change those policies, or are fighting about right?

Obama/Brown Voters
NOT ENOUGH / TOO HARD / ABOUT RIGHT / NOT SURE
37% / 15% / 21% / 27%

That's Obama voters who voted for Brown!
 

gcubed

Member
JoeBoy101 said:
That's the poll Puffington Host is talking about. Move On might have commissioned it, but Research 2000 did the poll. I'm telling you the crosstabs show a very liberal constituency that feels that Obama has not done enough and that the focus should be on the Economy and Jobs. But at the same time, is very much for democrats.

Not to rub salt on the wound, but Coakley should have won this election. Based on this poll, it should have been a cakewalk. For example:



That's Obama voters who voted for Brown!

So basically its coming out that Coakley was more of an embarrassment then previously thought?
 

JoeBoy101

Member
Tamanon said:
Of course Coakley should've won. She seemed to forget that you still have to campaign.

Yeah, but I thought the populist rage would have made it much more difficult for her to win, but still win. This poll, says that's not really the case, and stresses that though there was populist rage, it would not have taken much to convince the voters to vote Democrat. At least, for the ones who voted Obama.
 

Pimpwerx

Member
ToxicAdam said:
If you oppose health care, is it because:

A: It goes to far
B: It doesn't go far enough
C: Not sure


Answer: Well, I am in favor of health care reform and feel that every American should be covered. But, I feel as if the current plan is too costly to acheive this possibility and I fear how it will effect the health care plan I receive now. I feel the best possible answer is a single payer system that will share risk across the entire population, but that's not a possibility right now.


Survey taker: So, you feel as if HCR goes too far and doesn't go far enough?


Answer: Shit, just put me down for C.
Wow! I agree completely. My current healthplan is of the mythical type, but that's my preference to the bill on offer. Am I ...a conservative? PEACE.
 

gcubed

Member
JoeBoy101 said:
Yeah, but I thought the populist rage would have made it much more difficult for her to win, but still win. This poll, says that's not really the case, and stresss that though there was populist rage, it would not have taken much to convince the voters to vote Democrat. At least, for the ones who voted Obama.

not sure what ot make of the poll though, because its just stupidity on paper.

Dems arent doing enough to challenge republicans in congress, so lets... vote in a republican. It doesnt make sense to me.

Pimpwerx said:
Wow! I agree completely. My current healthplan is of the mythical type, but that's my preference to the bill on offer. Am I ...a conservative? PEACE.


no... the best possible answer would be "it doesnt go far enough" you and TA just can't answer questions apparently.
 
To those that think Obama has somehow lost or failed his presidency .....tsk tsk... this mass senate seat loss will help him govern and will probably help his state of address be more emotional ...
 

Pimpwerx

Member
JoeBoy101 said:
http://pol.moveon.org/brownpoll/

Look at the crosstabs. The mandate goes over like a lead balloon with the voters with 59% opposing who voted for Brown, 55% who didn't.
I'm so fucking vindicated. This was/is gonna be an albatross around the Dems' necks. We're not playing chicken with the system, we're just not that eager to pay greedy insurers. This thread was hijacked by a vocal minority when it came to that topic. This bill is a fucking disaster. Kill it as long as it keeps that mandate. Ditch the mandate and I can then opt-in if it proves viable. Single-payer is still best though. PEACE.
 

gcubed

Member
Pimpwerx said:
I'm so fucking vindicated. This was/is gonna be an albatross around the Dems' necks. We're not playing chicken with the system, we're just not that eager to pay greedy insurers. This thread was hijacked by a vocal minority when it came to that topic. This bill is a fucking disaster. Kill it as long as it keeps that mandate. Ditch the mandate and I can then opt-in if it proves viable. Single-payer is still best though. PEACE.

so the discussion we had yesterday is basically the same... you dont understand how this works at all... glad we cleared this up
 

Pimpwerx

Member
gcubed said:
no... the best possible answer would be "it doesnt go far enough" you and TA just can't answer questions apparently.
Nah, that woulda been my answer, B. But TA is pretty conservative, and I was surprised to see him in favor of a single-payer system. PEACE.
 

ToxicAdam

Member
gcubed said:
no... the best possible answer would be "it doesnt go far enough" you and TA just can't answer questions apparently.


But I clearly state that it is too costly and may have a negative effect on my current plan. That's going "too far" for the lame way this question was presented.
 

Pimpwerx

Member
gcubed said:
so the discussion we had yesterday is basically the same... you dont understand how this works at all... glad we cleared this up
What makes single-payer so great? Don't be obtuse. I understand full well, I just don't agree with you. PEACE.

EDIT: Or rather, I don't agree that supporting this bill is in any way a good idea. You guys would like to paint the opposition as incompetent, but that's just plain bullshit when you're talking to someone in favor of single-payer. The best feature of that is distributing the cost across the tax base, DUH!
 

Y2Kev

TLG Fan Caretaker Est. 2009
I don't agree, PD. They can't pass anything if Republicans say no on everything. The Republicans effectively have taken over because Reid is a spineless shitburger.
 

gcubed

Member
Pimpwerx said:
What makes single-payer so great? Don't be obtuse. I understand full well, I just don't agree with you. PEACE.

i would love single payer, i'm not being obtuse, you dont agree with common sense. You can't remove pre-existing condition exemptions and ban the dropping of people from plans if you dont ensure EVERYONE... hence, as TA pointed out you "share the risk"

ToxicAdam said:
But I clearly state that it is too costly and may have a negative effect on my current plan. That's going "too far" for the lame way this question was presented.


you feel the "best possible answer would be single payer"... no matter if you think it is feasible or not, if you feel the best possible answer is single payer, then you think that the current bill "does not go far enough"... its not a very difficult question
 

xbhaskarx

Member
Y2Kev said:
I don't agree, PD. They can't pass anything if Republicans say no on everything. The Republicans effectively have taken over because Reid is a spineless shitburger.

Well, Reid will be gone soon enough.
 

Pimpwerx

Member
gcubed said:
i would love single payer, i'm not being obtuse, you dont agree with common sense. You can't remove pre-existing condition exemptions and ban the dropping of people from plans if you dont ensure EVERYONE... hence, as TA pointed out you "share the risk"
I edited it shortly after that to be more clear. This bill is garbage. What part of that don't you comprehend? I'm not gonna pretend you don't understand, you just don't agree. You think it's worth saving. I'm not exactly sure why, though, when it's clear not many people like it. And it's not because everyone is ignorant of its merits. It's just not a good bill. FFS, can't anyone disagree anymore? PEACE.
 
quadriplegicjon said:

I'm with you man. I want to star in a Taritino film punishing people who can rationalize this:

Nearly half (49%) of Obama voters who voted for Brown support the Senate health care bill or think it does not go far enough. Only 11% think the legislation goes too far.

I mean WTF. How does that even make sense?
 

gcubed

Member
Pimpwerx said:
I edited it shortly after that to be more clear. This bill is garbage. What part of that don't you comprehend? I'm not gonna pretend you don't understand, you just don't agree. You think it's worth saving. I'm not exactly sure why, though, when it's clear not many people like it. And it's not because everyone is ignorant of its merits. It's just not a good bill. FFS, can't anyone disagree anymore? PEACE.

no i agree, i am just arguing with you point that you want all the other things but just not the mandate... thats not how things work, if you only use insurance when you are sick, you arent "sharing the risk", all the single payer is is a tax funded mandate paid to the gov't instead of a personal funded mandate paid to the insurance companies
 

mAcOdIn

Member
As much as I hate to say it I think a mandate is necessary if we're going to reform the system yet keep it in private hands, I just don't think it's financially feasible to expect insurance companies to not deny some payments or to insure people with expensive pre existing conditions without picking up the healthy youngins that don't currently have insurance. I mean it sounds nice to say that they need to build the perfect system then let us decide to join it but I don't think it'd work. If we're going to keep something similar to our current system a mandate is necessary unless we give up on insuring those who can't get coverage and shit like that. Most importantly though, regarding the mandate is I think the rights and direction of the board that'd oversee that shit needs to be more clearly defined, that was always my main gripe with that bill, that despite it having a mandate and a few good measures in place the future of the bill was up in the air outside of it not able to lose money, we had no real sense of direction, goals, what was considered fair, it was a gamble. The bill could have turned out pretty good in 10 years with the right people watching the exchange or it could have become worse just with sick people also having insurance. If there is going to be a mandate I think things need to be a little clearer than that.
 
Snowe? Really?

We're starting to pick up hints that the White House is making another serious bid to pick up the vote of Sen. Olympia Snowe. Really? If they do it and get a reasonable bill, great. But it's exceedingly difficult for me to see that as a realistic possibility.
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2010/01/snowe_really.php

"After yesterday's historic election and given the political climate in this country, I certainly cannot support democrats ramming this bill through the senate. I think we should come back to this issue after the November elections to let the people speak first."
 

Pimpwerx

Member
gcubed said:
no i agree, i am just arguing with you point that you want all the other things but just not the mandate... thats not how things work, if you only use insurance when you are sick, you arent "sharing the risk", all the single payer is is a tax funded mandate paid to the gov't instead of a personal funded mandate paid to the insurance companies
So a robust public option gets my support. This isn't rocket science. This bill doesn't suck because the public doesn't know what it wants. It sucks because of Olympia Snowe and the D-bags in Congress who fell on their swords before the fight even started. Why didn't we all blow our stacks when Obama mentioned the mandate last year on tv? Because he also mentioned a "robust" public option. Ha! Let's stop making excuses for shitty litigation. That's what it comes off as because there are so many good policy options they scrapped because of lobbyists or conservative pandering. PEACE.
 

gcubed

Member
Pimpwerx said:
So a robust public option gets my support. This isn't rocket science. This bill doesn't suck because the public doesn't know what it wants. It sucks because of Olympia Snowe and the D-bags in Congress who fell on their swords before the fight even started. Why didn't we all blow our stacks when Obama mentioned the mandate last year on tv? Because he also mentioned a "robust" public option. Ha! Let's stop making excuses for shitty litigation. That's what it comes off as because there are so many good policy options they scrapped because of lobbyists or conservative pandering. PEACE.

thats fine then, nothing to argue with anymore, thats much better then "get rid of the mandate and let the rest go through" which was the only point i was contending. I still have no idea how a public option lost support so fast despite it being one of the only parts of the health care plan that had a large majority of public support.
 
Republican party: Bunch of old men who only no
Democratic party: Bunch of idealist hippies who can't say no.


Dem majority: We want to pass this bill
Republicans: No
D: We will!
R: No.
D: Fine, we'll make some changes
R: No
D: More changes!
R: No.
D: Fine, we give up.

Democrat voters: Fuck you democrats, Im not voting for you again.




Republican majority: We want to pass this patriot act bill
D: We don't like it
R: We're passing it.
D: Let's make changes?
R: No
D: But we don't like it
R: We don't care
D: Just this one amendment...
R: No
D: Please?
R: No.
D: Fine, we'll agree to it.

Democrat voters: Fuck you democrats, Im not voting for you again
 

JoeBoy101

Member
Byakuya769 said:
I'm with you man. I want to star in a Taritino film punishing people who can rationalize this:



I mean WTF. How does that even make sense?

large_martha%20coakley.JPG


This is why. Elections are still popularity contests, and sometimes its regardless of the issues. And in an approx. one week time span, this woman suggest Catholics should not work in emergency rooms, called Curt Schilling a Red Sox fan, misspelled Mass. in one of her ads, and denigrated personal campaigning with the electorate.

At the same time, Brown was utilizing the Internet for large campaign infusions while the RNC and the NRSC were sending him money and resources below the radar. Polarizing republican figures like this one:

Sarah-Palin-smile.jpg


not only stayed away but refusing to bite at being baited into jumping into the race. And Brown could be mocked for his truck, but he used it and a campaign very open to the public to connect with voters personally.

The issues mattered little in this election. Ironically, this poll tells me that all these dems wetting their pants are premature because this election was not a message or referendum, but a simple popularity contest that Brown won.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom